Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
does anyone have any loading information on this cartridge? i've drawn blanks on my searches. thanks for any help. PLEASE EXCUSE CAPS, HANDICAPPED TYPIST. "THE" THREAD KILLER IT'S OK......I'VE STARTED UP MY MEDS AGAIN. THEY SHOULD TAKE EFFECT IN ABOUT A WEEK. (STACI-2006) HAPPY TRAILS HANDLOADS ARE LIKE UNDERWEAR....BE CAREFUL WHO YOU SWAP WITH. BILL | ||
|
one of us |
Sorry, never heard of it. The capacity shouldn't be too much bigger than the .264 Win Mag, so that would be a good start. Relative to the bore cross section, the case capacity is similar to the .257 Wea and a bit lower than the .30-378. For a given SD bullet, the powders among these cartidges will be similar. Hodgdon has data for those three just mentioned. | |||
|
one of us |
I do believe it is called the .264 Winchester Magnum... | |||
|
One of Us |
Fraid not ,Steve. roger Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone.. | |||
|
one of us |
| |||
|
One of Us |
The 264 WM, 7MM RM, and 338 WM, are all three 2.040" to the shoulder, and 2.500" in max case length. The 300 Win mag is slightly bigger. From the Hornady Handbook of cartridge Reloading Volume 1: "The cartridge[300 win mag] is based on the 338 winchester with the shoulder moved forward by .156" and the case lengthened by .120" | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia