Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Guys, I am taking a reloading course soon and am considering using Wincheter 760. I have never reloaded before. How do Winchester powders compare to others?? | ||
|
one of us |
You don`t say what cartridge your going to load but W760 works well in quite afew. I have used it in my 708s with good results, although not the best, and in a 30-06 with 150 gr bullets. I`d keep a open mind on powders, some work very well in one rifle and not at all in the next of the same caliber. The only way you`ll know is by trying. I have found some powders from Win to work very well in my rifles (748 in .223) and other rifles or bullets prefer other brands. Sometimes a slight change in burn rate can make a big differance in accuracy / preformance. If you tell us what cartridge your loading for I`m sure you`ll get a response as to some excellent powders to try. Welcome to the hobby!! | |||
|
<Loren> |
H414 is very similar to W-760 ( I hear it's made for Hodgdon by Winchester). I've had good results from H414 in my .30-06. | ||
one of us |
I would not use Win. powders. Use Imr or Hodgdon or Alliant. Win. discontinued to many i was using.Win. may not even make there powder. Today, ball powder is a product of Primex Technologies, INC. ( from win. powder guide 1999.) | |||
|
one of us |
Johnny, I currently am a proponent of Winchester powders and have had excellent results (for pistol loads). Currently, I use 231 & 296. I use 231 for 9mm, .357, .38 & .45ACP. Conversly, 296 for .357. I like the 296 best for .357. The only lesson learned to share is that with the 231 powder, ensure your round is crimped down as far as it'll go. Otherwise you might experiance minute amounts of powder remaining unburned.
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. [This message has been edited by Alex Szabo (edited 03-16-2002).] | |||
|
<Dan in Wa> |
W296 in the .45ACP? Blue Dot is as slow as I go in this caliber. | ||
one of us |
quote: Dan, Thanks [very much] for pointing out my foible (which I have promptly corrected)! I was pounding out on the keyboard and did not proof my work. Actually, most of the time, I'll use Bullseye for 45 ACP vice the Blue Dot because I do not need as much powder to obtain identical performance. Conversely, 231 is very, very, very similar in performance to the Bullseye. I think it boils down to economics and the old Ford versus Chevy argument. ------------------ Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. | |||
|
one of us |
I've used 231, 748, 760, 785, and WMR. As posted earlier, they do tend to change powders too often. Of the bunch, I've found 231 and 760 the most useful. I've never found their slower powders do anything better than the much easier to find Hodgedon or IMR offerings. | |||
|
<Don Martin29> |
Start with IMR powders. As pointed out the Winchester powders change all of the time. With IMR powders you can use one of the many free interior ballistic formulas based on Homer Powleys calculations. IMR rifle powders are affordable and consistant. They are the standard. | ||
one of us |
Thanks for all the help guys. I appreciate it. | |||
|
<eldeguello> |
They seem to drop their magnum,extra slow powders. However, 748 and 760 have been on the market since the early 70's, so should be here for a while yet. | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia