one of us
| TRY R26 3100 with a 150 gn proj |
| Posts: 1488 | Location: AUSTRALIA | Registered: 07 August 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| 4831 |
| Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by butchloc: 4831
Would that be Hodgdon or IMR? |
| Posts: 787 | Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa | Registered: 24 December 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Between the Hodgdon and IMR versions of 4831 I'd pick the one that shoots the best in your gun. If limited to one or the other I'd go with the Hodgdon short cut version of H 4831. It's marketed as H4831sc.
Tom Z
NRA Life Member
|
| Posts: 2347 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 07 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| H4831 or 4831SC.
Doug Wilhelmi NRA Life Member
|
| Posts: 7503 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 15 October 2013 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| You might try IMR-4831. After many years of using Hodgdens, I've found I like IMR even better. |
| Posts: 668 | Location: NW Colorado | Registered: 10 December 2007 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Karoo, I haven't heard of the S powders you've mentioned, and don't see them listed in any burn rate tables. Are they strictly local powders in S. Africa? With the Alliant powders, in addition to RL26 mentioned by M 98, RL22 has produced good results in a lot of 270s. And Vihtavuori N165 and double-base N560 are in about the right place in the burn rate table, a little slower than the 4831s, but great powders, particularly with heavier bullets.
______________________________
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell
|
| Posts: 166 | Location: Vancouver, BC Canada | Registered: 17 April 2015 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Hybrid 100 V.. for the 140gr bullets work extremely well out of my model70, groups were better than with H4831sc that I have used for years. Velocity was a 100f/s faster I have only used it for two years mostly in cold weather. |
| |
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by Sagebrush Burns: You might try IMR-4831. After many years of using Hodgdens, I've found I like IMR even better.
WARNING: IMR 4831 is significantly faster than H4831. Adjust loads accordingly. I can't believe that no one has recommended IMR 7828 SSC. I've found it to give somewhat more consistent velocities and accuracy than the currently manufactured H4831 from Australia. My loads with 7828 run about 3% heavier than H4831 for similar velocities. |
| Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| you can never go wrong with H4350 in 270 win. 130's to 150's |
| Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| If I were loading out of need rather than pleasure, I'd use IMR or Hodgdon in either 4350 or 4831 and just spend a few hours to find your load that works without excessive pressure in hotter weather and then stick with it. All 4 of those are excellent powders for almost any bullet weight in the 270 Win.
Zeke |
| |
One of Us
| H4831 is as good as it gets for the 140 grain 270Win load, but sometimes I have had to try different primers.
Dennis Life member NRA
|
| Posts: 1191 | Location: Ft. Morgan, CO | Registered: 15 April 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by vines: you can never go wrong with H4350 in 270 win. 130's to 150's
Exactly. |
| Posts: 395 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06 March 2010 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by South Pender: Karoo, I haven't heard of the S powders you've mentioned, and don't see them listed in any burn rate tables. Are they strictly local powders in S. Africa? With the Alliant powders, in addition to RL26 mentioned by M 98, RL22 has produced good results in a lot of 270s. And Vihtavuori N165 and double-base N560 are in about the right place in the burn rate table, a little slower than the 4831s, but great powders, particularly with heavier bullets.
South, I found this burn rate comparison chart from Peregrine Bullets made in South Africa. It will give you an idea of where Somchem fits in. http://peregrinebullets.co.za/...ness-Chart-Rev03.pdf |
| Posts: 787 | Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa | Registered: 24 December 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Then as per the chart of "Relative" burn speeds H4350 would seem to be the best choice to start with, as it shows a slightly slower burn then the IMR which should give you a slight latitude on pressure. |
| Posts: 210 | Location: Misplaced Yorkshireman | Registered: 21 March 2011 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| go to or workable? basically i use h335 for "Everything" - and have used from 223 and 7.62x25 all the way through the 550 magnum - why? during the Obama Admin, i had to simplify my reloading options, and found that h335 worked "good enough" for everything, and with a little tuning, stayed accurate and delivered more than acceptable results so, to keep it simple smith, i now only use h335 - one powder to learn to read the primers, and easy peasy to buy a jug, rather than 8x1# cans of differing powder .. therefore cheaper, too.. |
| |
One of Us
| I use RL23 as my go to powder for the 270 Win and 140gr Accubonds or Trophy Bonded Tipped I us same load for both. Second Choice is Spuerformance. For 150gr Nolser Partitions I use Norma MRP. RL26 will be fastest in both bullet weights but little less accuract. Plus RL23 is one of the most temperature insensitive powders on the market. Works good in my 7mm Mag as does MRP . |
| |
one of us
| Karoo,
H4831SC very closely followed by N165.
You will get higher speeds with others like Re23 or N560 but the accuracy and stability H4831SC and N165 has given me in my two .270s is absolutely unbeatable.
And I am no longer concerned about maximum speed. |
| Posts: 874 | Location: Madrid-Spain | Registered: 03 July 2000 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| H4831 is very hard to beat for a number of reasons. Ballistic performance and availability come to mind. Especially if loading out of necessity. R26 works well too. Cheers. |
| Posts: 146 | Location: Saskatchewan | Registered: 16 October 2010 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| H4831 is the historically number 1 .270 powder, and the early WW2 4831 is even better, but hard to come by..I have about 40 pounds of that stuff that's clean as can be, more velocity and less pressure..4350 to a lesser degree perhaps? The down side is that stuff measures horribly, cuts grs. and you need to weigh your loads I suppose, some do and some do not.. Today I prefer RL-22, and RL-19 it gives me plenty of velocity and measures thru my powder measure so well that no need to weigh charges if you have a good powder measure and know how to use one..and its accurate as can be..
Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120
rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
|
| Posts: 42228 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| RL23 with 140gr Bullets, RL26 or MRP with 150gr bullets. |
| |
new member
| I have used IMR 4350 for many years for all my .270 loads, but it is rather temperature-sensitive and may not be a good choice for African temps. In the last couple of years, I started using IMR 4451 in my 140 grain loads and am very happy with it. |
| |
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by vines: you can never go wrong with H4350 in 270 win. 130's to 150's
My thoughts and experience as well! |
| Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006 |
IP
|
|