One of Us

| FC = Federal Cartridge Doubt if it is military. Looks like you are at max by SPEER data (no. 12) with 52 grainers + compressed. Other manuals seem to prefer 748.
_______________________
|
| Posts: 4929 | Location: Bryan, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| 760, in my opinion, is too slow for the 223. As mentioned 748 is the better powder choice. |
| |
one of us
| One question would be if the primer pockets were crimped. If so, they are probably to mil spec. I have not found much difference, if any, in millitary and not anyway.
Larry
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
|
| Posts: 3943 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us

| MIl ammo is not marked FC. |
| |
One of Us

| Nor .223 REM quote: Originally posted by dpcd: MIl ammo is not marked FC.
.
|
| Posts: 10902 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| Thanks Guys,
I was just using 760 because I wouldn't miss it. Since there seems to be no objection to compressed loads, I'll give them a shot. The compression stalled me.
Actually it was Sierra 1978 for 55 grain semi-point and spritzer. Think the max was 29 grains 760, but after the first 28 was a little high, I drop-tubed them. I don't know how they got 29 grains of 760 in and not mark as a compressed load unless 760 changed that much since 1978.
Thanks again, Minkman |
| Posts: 659 | Location: "The Muck", NJ | Registered: 10 April 2004 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| Military 5.56 brass does Not have less case capacity than Civilian 223 brass. In fact most Military brass has More case capacity than 223 brass. |
| Posts: 1205 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 07 February 2004 | 
IP
|
|