One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa321/fa3219dcf529369975400a06b5b9a0553d4a47b5" alt="Picture of BNagel Picture of BNagel"
| FC = Federal Cartridge Doubt if it is military. Looks like you are at max by SPEER data (no. 12) with 52 grainers + compressed. Other manuals seem to prefer 748.
_______________________
|
| Posts: 4917 | Location: Bryan, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
| 760, in my opinion, is too slow for the 223. As mentioned 748 is the better powder choice. |
| |
one of us
| One question would be if the primer pockets were crimped. If so, they are probably to mil spec. I have not found much difference, if any, in millitary and not anyway.
Larry
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
|
| Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1dc7/e1dc7ed1836d7992cac0188a1b2c5c3fe4592bdd" alt="Picture of dpcd Picture of dpcd"
| MIl ammo is not marked FC. |
| |
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b2f/c1b2f1fcd7b12ffd761390425d9415494fabfc4c" alt="Picture of Grenadier Picture of Grenadier"
| Nor .223 REM quote: Originally posted by dpcd: MIl ammo is not marked FC.
.
|
| Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
one of us
| Thanks Guys,
I was just using 760 because I wouldn't miss it. Since there seems to be no objection to compressed loads, I'll give them a shot. The compression stalled me.
Actually it was Sierra 1978 for 55 grain semi-point and spritzer. Think the max was 29 grains 760, but after the first 28 was a little high, I drop-tubed them. I don't know how they got 29 grains of 760 in and not mark as a compressed load unless 760 changed that much since 1978.
Thanks again, Minkman |
| Posts: 659 | Location: "The Muck", NJ | Registered: 10 April 2004 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
one of us
| Military 5.56 brass does Not have less case capacity than Civilian 223 brass. In fact most Military brass has More case capacity than 223 brass. |
| Posts: 1205 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 07 February 2004 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|