THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Head stamp question
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
A friend gave me some brass and dies for .223 Rem to load for him. The head stamp is "F C .223 REM", is this the heavier, smaller capacity military case? I loaded five with 28 grains of Win 760 and V-Max 55grain flat base before I remembered. The powder filled to the top of the shoulder and the bullets seemed long, so I assume its compressed. Should I pull them or continue? Oh! they're for a semi-auto.

Thanks
 
Posts: 659 | Location: "The Muck", NJ | Registered: 10 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BNagel
posted Hide Post
FC = Federal Cartridge
Doubt if it is military. Looks like you are at max by SPEER data (no. 12) with 52 grainers + compressed. Other manuals seem to prefer 748.


_______________________


 
Posts: 4893 | Location: Bryan, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
760, in my opinion, is too slow for the 223. As mentioned 748 is the better powder choice.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
One question would be if the primer pockets were crimped. If so, they are probably to mil spec. I have not found much difference, if any, in millitary and not anyway.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
MIl ammo is not marked FC.
 
Posts: 17371 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
Nor .223 REM
quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
MIl ammo is not marked FC.




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Guys,

I was just using 760 because I wouldn't miss it. Since there seems to be no objection to compressed loads, I'll give them a shot. The compression stalled me.

Actually it was Sierra 1978 for 55 grain semi-point and spritzer. Think the max was 29 grains 760, but after the first 28 was a little high, I drop-tubed them. I don't know how they got 29 grains of 760 in and not mark as a compressed load unless 760 changed that much since 1978.

Thanks again, Minkman
 
Posts: 659 | Location: "The Muck", NJ | Registered: 10 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Military 5.56 brass does Not have less case capacity than Civilian 223 brass. In fact most Military brass has More case capacity than 223 brass.
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 07 February 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia