19 June 2013, 20:50
MinkmanHead stamp question
A friend gave me some brass and dies for .223 Rem to load for him. The head stamp is "F C .223 REM", is this the heavier, smaller capacity military case? I loaded five with 28 grains of Win 760 and V-Max 55grain flat base before I remembered. The powder filled to the top of the shoulder and the bullets seemed long, so I assume its compressed. Should I pull them or continue? Oh! they're for a semi-auto.
Thanks
19 June 2013, 21:04
BNagelFC = Federal Cartridge
Doubt if it is military. Looks like you are at max by SPEER data (no. 12) with 52 grainers + compressed. Other manuals seem to prefer 748.
19 June 2013, 21:25
SmokinJ760, in my opinion, is too slow for the 223. As mentioned 748 is the better powder choice.
19 June 2013, 21:34
larrysOne question would be if the primer pockets were crimped. If so, they are probably to mil spec. I have not found much difference, if any, in millitary and not anyway.
MIl ammo is not marked FC.
20 June 2013, 01:52
GrenadierNor .223 REM
quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
MIl ammo is not marked FC.
20 June 2013, 21:39
MinkmanThanks Guys,
I was just using 760 because I wouldn't miss it. Since there seems to be no objection to compressed loads, I'll give them a shot. The compression stalled me.
Actually it was Sierra 1978 for 55 grain semi-point and spritzer. Think the max was 29 grains 760, but after the first 28 was a little high, I drop-tubed them. I don't know how they got 29 grains of 760 in and not mark as a compressed load unless 760 changed that much since 1978.
Thanks again, Minkman
21 June 2013, 06:59
steve4102Military 5.56 brass does Not have less case capacity than Civilian 223 brass. In fact most Military brass has More case capacity than 223 brass.