THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Reloading    280 Ackley Improved (AI): Norma vs. Nosler Custom brass (POLL)

Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
280 Ackley Improved (AI): Norma vs. Nosler Custom brass (POLL)
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Kenati
posted
Kreiger is in the midst of working on a blueprinted M700 I am having a 26" barrel fitted and chambered for a 280 AI. More details on that in another post as the project moves along...

I am anxious to begin collecting reloading components so I will be ready to go when the rifle arrives.

There have been several discussions in the past about doughnuts and such using the Nosler brass. In light of that, I am trying to decide if I which brass I want to go with.

I don't mind fireforming brass because most of it is done during barrel break-in anyway.

Norma 280 Rem. vs. Nosler 280 AI

Either can be had for the same price of about $110 per 100 pieces (ouch... but the stuff lasts forever in the AI), so the price difference is not an issue either.

Thanks in advance!

Question:
Given your real-world experience, which would you choose?

(please comment below)

Choices:
Norma - 280 Rem
Nosler - 280 AI
I have never tried either personally and therefore shouldn't really vote but I can't hlep myself from clicking on polls

 
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Dirty Coast | Registered: 23 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kenati
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Dirty Coast | Registered: 23 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
I use 280 Norma for the majority of my wildcats.It will give you about 3grs more capacity than the Nosler.

I bought some Nosler 280 (non AI) didn't like it and sold it.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of woods
posted Hide Post
Hey Kenati

Thanks for the links to some of those old posts. Very entertaining! tu2

I voted for the Norma since I do have experience with Nosler. Not that the Nosler is bad brass and I don't think it is the brass's fault that the 280AI develops do-nuts. But, by contrast, the 280 Rem brass I started using is working out well, it is Nosler also.

In the past I have used Norma and considered it pretty good stuff. Lighter than most, like WW brass, but better stuff.

Fireforming can be quite accurate as long as you don't try forming a false shoulder


____________________________________
There are those who would misteach us that to stick in a rut is consistency - and a virtue, and that to climb out of the rut is inconsistency - and a vice.
- Mark Twain |

Chinese Proverb: When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others.

___________________________________
 
Posts: 2750 | Location: Houston, Tx | Registered: 17 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
On the issue of which brass to use, I know which camp I stand in. If .280 AI brass is available, I would much prefer to use that, rather then fireform other brass. (Caveat: naturally, the .280 AI brass has to be of comparable quality to the brass considered for fireforming).

I have a couple of reasons for this: I personally question whether the additional work of fireforming brass is really worth the effort to go from a .280 Rem to a .280 AI. But if .280 AI brass is readily available (make sure you lay in a good supply), the .280 AI cartridge is a great choice.

In my case, I found that not only did I have to fireform .280 Rem brass (no .280 AI brass was available when I first had an AI chamber cut), I also realized that my cases workhardened in the fireforming process. So, fireforming for me had to be followed by annealing. Let's see how many steps were involved in getting brass I could use for hunting: neck up, neck down (to create false shoulder, to ensure good brass life), load, fire, anneal. Man, that seems a lot of work for 80-100 fps extra...

In addition, unless you have a fireforming barrel, you'll reduce the lifetime of your main (custom) barrel in the fireforming process. Yes, maybe you can use fireforming loads for something "sensible", but I found that if I wanted to go hunting, I wanted finished brass and loads of full potential.

All in all, if fireforming .280 Rem brass was the only option, I would no longer have bothered with the AI. Now that .280 AI brass is available, I would consider the cartridge an excellent choice.

- mike


*********************
The rifle is a noble weapon... It entices its bearer into primeval forests, into mountains and deserts untenanted by man. - Horace Kephart
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
All I have used thus far is nosler as I've not seen norma available for quite sometime.I thought I read once that norma made the brass for nosler?? I have, however had no issues with the nosler brass and find it well made. With my rifle I will usually see some groups between 1/2"-3/4" with TTSX/RL22. I think it's a great caliber.
 
Posts: 549 | Location: n.e.Mn | Registered: 14 October 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of jackfish
posted Hide Post
When I got my 280 Rem AI in 1998 green box 280 Remington 140 grain CoreLokt ammo could be had for about $9 a box. Today its $20-30, about the same price as Nosler 280 AI and Norma 280 brass. It was a good way for me to get and fireform brass for the 280 AI. However, someone starting today might as well get the properly headstamped brass available and start from there. I've gotten great accuracy and case life with Remington brass, I would expect the same from Nosler. Over the years I've read much about the virtues of Norma 280 Remington brass but have not used it myself.


You learn something new everyday whether you want to or not.
 
Posts: 1080 | Location: Western Wisconsin | Registered: 21 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Kenati, I have only used Nosler 280 AI Brass for my rifle. I have not experienced the development of any doughnuts at all, and have reloaded the initial 50 pieces 4 times.

For many of the same reasons MHO posts, I would choose to go with brass already made in the 280AI if I could get it, so for both of these reasons, I voted for the Nosler brass. I am using 7828 and 140 gr TTSX and Accubonds, as well as 160gr AB's. I am really liking the performance I have seen with AB's so far....The TTSX's are very accurate also BTW. One interesting point, I use the Hornady dies on this rifle, and had to grind a few thousandths off of the bottom of the die in order to be able to push the shoulder back such that it would chamber properly....

I like Norma brass, but I actually prefer the Nosler in cases where I have used both. In my 280AI, I have discovered what many folks have advised happens in AI cartridges, ONE grain of powder made a BIG difference in 'typical' pressure signs, i.e. stickly bolt. I could NOT discern differences in CHE or PRE that were disconcerting, but when I got a sticky bolt, I backed of 2.5 grains from that charge, and called it my personal max for that powder and cartridge--that LOT of powder just to be specific.

I haven't shot enough of this cartridge to comment on case life, but steep shouldered cartridges have had good case life for me typically, i.e. Dakota and WSM cartridges--don't know if that's a good comparison or not, JME....

Oh Yeah, on those old posts, it was entertaining, especially me getting slapped around by Woods and HC. After a measuring consultation, I ended up being right, and pushing the shoulder back about 3.5 to 4 thousandths to get the fit I liked, and this rifle is shooting very well, as it always has actually......
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kenati
posted Hide Post
Ramrod, woods, mho, jackfish, and Fish30114-

I thank all of you very much for responding. We sometimes take AR for granted, but can you imagine how many "riflemen" you'd have to ask this specific esoteric question before you'd actually get an opinion worth a damn?

Thanks again!
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Dirty Coast | Registered: 23 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Kenati, I'm alittle late on posting but here my experience with the 280AI.

I had my 280AI chamber before Nolser came out with their 280AI so I fireformed Rem brass. The new Rem 280 brass if I filled it to the top of the neck with H-4350 was appr 66gr of powder after fireforming and resized capacity was appr 70gr of powder. Later I got some Nolser 280AI cases and they fit my chamber again using same powder top of neck was appr 70grs of powder.

I've got about 4/5 firing on the Rem brass haven't had problems with it I use Wilson neck die and seater for sizing use Redding body die.

I got 150 Nosler 280AI cases been shooting some of that been good cases. I've got another 280AI in the works same gunsmith/reamer.

I fireformed all my cases using the COW method and since I can load at the range after I got afew fireformed cases I broke barrel in and got some load developemnt done on that first range
trip.

I haven't had any problem with inside donut my inside neck reamer measure .284 I do keep check on the Rem brass.

I haven't notice a big difference between the Rem/Nosler brass in groups to say which is best rifle do under 1/2" for 3 shots that good enough and it was put together right.

I don't mind fireforming and being retired have time to do it plus it's something I enjoy.
I've never based accuracy on the type of brass I use it's always been a combination of things and tuning the load for the rifle so I've been luicky with the brass I've used to the 280AI.


VFW
 
Posts: 1098 | Location: usa | Registered: 16 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If I'm not mistaken Norma makes Noslers brass.

Nosler chamfers, deburs the flashole and weight sorts their brass.

I would go with Nosler brass.
 
Posts: 3785 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kenati
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tom holland:
here my experience with the 280AI.


That is all really helpful info, Tom. I appreciate your input.
---------------------

.366 torque,

I've heard the same about the Norma/Nosler relationship, but didn't know if it was true or not. Sounds pretty believable to me!


Guess I'll be placing an order for my Nosler brass today.
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Dirty Coast | Registered: 23 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kenati
posted Hide Post
Midway has the Nosler brass on sale. I picked up 100 pieces for $111.58. Of course, that meant I had to order a bunch of other stuff that I "needed" too... haha! I'm sure all you know how that goes.
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Dirty Coast | Registered: 23 November 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Reloading    280 Ackley Improved (AI): Norma vs. Nosler Custom brass (POLL)

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia