either of the 4831 powders are a bit fast...
look here IMR only lists one powder!!!

I had the same thought, but thought I would seek the opinions of others.

I would think that the H1000 would be close in performance to IMR 7828 but to look at Hogdon's data it looks like a dog comparatively. Aren't the two pretty close in burn rate and applicability?

I would like to try the H1000 if I could get decent velocity as I have 6 pounds of it compared to two pounds of 7828.

RL25 and H1000 are close to IMR7828 on the burn rate chart

RL25 is also a fine performance powder for the .257 Weatherby.

I'm not sure but there might be a difference in density and they just can't get enough of the less dense powder in the case.

Burn rate don't always tell the whole story.....

You should try it and work up cautiously and don't be afraid of compressing.....

RL22 has been hard to beat in the .257 Weatherby. I load 72 grains with the 100 TSX, velocity is over 3600 fps, 3 shots in .6 at 100 yards. As always I would ease my way up to that max. or stop when the chrono says 3600. On occasion and with a clean barrel, this load will one hole for three shots, but seems to require a bit of cleaning every 15-20 shots. IMR probably only has one powder for the .257 no. 7828. RL 25 should work, I have some but the RL22 load gives me no reason to test it.

Mmmmmm
H4831SC
IMR4350
N205 IF you can find any, is my favorite

LLS

4064

I'd stay with IMR-7828
From 64.0 grains to 73.0 grains
Federal 215 Primer

My rifle likes RL-22 for the 115 and 120 grain Nosler Partition and 100 and 115 grain Barnes TSX. It also likes H-1000 for 110 grain Berger. Good shooting.