One of Us
| They are exactly the same except the match has one more visual inspection. Butch |
| | | Posts: 8964 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| Precision shooter did a huge artical once called prime on primer I believe. It showed the 210M performed totally different as far as power, and impact. They had some gadget that showed the distance it would push a bullet with the primer alone, and some high speed photography. |
| | | Posts: 459 | Location: Finksburg, MD | Registered: 20 December 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by ricciardelli:
The only difference I have noticed between a "match" primer and a "non-match" primer, is the same as you have noticed...the price.
Yup....agreed.....I have but won't again spend the extra dollars.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
|
| | | Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Big Country, you are right. Precision Shooting did an article on primers a few years back. It did not compare the match Federal against the regulars, just against other brands. I believe that it said Federals were pretty consistant, but not as hot as far as velocity as the other brands. This is fine for BR shooters. A lot of us are going to Winchester primers as they shoot as well and they haven't gouged us as we have been with the Federals. I am speaking about benchrest short range{100-200 yds.] shooting only. I do not know about primers in other venues. Butch |
| | | Posts: 8964 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004 |
IP
|
|
Was wondering if the Federal large rifle 210 Match primer was much different than the standard large rifle 210 primer. I have never tried them and the double price doesn't appeal either.
