Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I understand some people here have pushed cartridges well beyond the books to failure. I would like to know what fails first? What signs did you see before the failure? Are their any �standard items that can allow you to push the limits further or push them safer? BTW, I plan on continuing to push the pressure and velocity limits, but not the safety limits. | ||
|
one of us |
Well not sure what your after but here is a suggestion.. If I was goin to see what gives first I would start at max load and go up from there by about .5grain increments.. More then likely your bolt will stick first or blow a primer but you really cant tell.. I know I wouldn't be pulling the trigger on it though.. I would strap it to something tie a string to it and get wayyy back and give it a pull.. I dont see why you want to unless you got a few guns around that you dont want anymore.. You never know what will happen.. Your treading on dangerous grounds so tread lightly 6.5 Bandit | |||
|
One of Us |
My understanding is that the first thing to give is going to be the brass case. The steel parts of the gun are much stronger than the brass. Once the hot gases find a way out of the brass case however, they will wreck the gun. I have asked about the feasibility of using steel cases and going way above maximum loads. I have not had any intelligent person tell me that's a good idea. For one thing, the steel cases that are available tend to be for military rounds, and you'll get more velocity out of a sanely loaded 300 WM than you ever will out of an overloaded steel-cased 7.62 x 39. Maybe there's a supplier of steel 30-378 cases. Let me know if you find him. H. C. | |||
|
one of us |
HenryC470, I can tell you that steel cases are not the way to go. They expand to fill the camber, but do not contract like brass cases. So the case gets stuck, even when not close to max load. | |||
|
one of us |
For the layman without access to expensive equipment... I load up until I get a flat primer or ejector mark, whichever comes first, then back off two grains... If you have a chronograph there is a point wherein an additional grain of powder will only give you 10 to 15 FPS increase, so that is not enough to go forward, then I back off a grain and call it good. I keep it simple and don't get quagmired in therory, and its worked for me, I have not blown a rifle as yet... If you wait until the bolt sticks then you have already gone way to far, and but for the grace of God, and good rifles, it didn't blow.. | |||
|
one of us |
6.5 bandit, I am looking more for pistols. In rifles, I have always been able to gun up. When I needed more power, I buy a bigger gun. I have never really �needed� anything more than 223, 308, 45-70. In pistols, it is a slightly different story. I like the concept of 45super. What I don�t like is the lack of reliable data. I assume I am pushing the limits, but unless you have already been there how do you know? Now let me take this one step further. I think it is possible to push the 9mm, but I am not willing to until I understand the signs better. So I will continue to have moderate 9mm ammo. You can say I have lost my nerve to push any further, until I understand the limits. | |||
|
one of us |
45 Super, now that warms my heart best thing that ever happened to a 1911 i've used this data and have had no problem with any of the loads http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/default.asp?Caliber=45%20Super&Weight=230&type=Handgun&Order=Powder&Source= | |||
|
one of us |
ddunn, I have seen a S&W 44mag lock up when it got way to hot.. Couldnt even budge the cylinder.. Now that same load was fired in a Ruger Super BlackHawk and it fired it just fine.. But I have to agree with the rest of the guys.. Best way is to fire it over a chrony that way you can tell whats really goin on.. You will come to a point of no return as I like to call it.. Meaning you will only gain a few fps if any at all when you add more powder.. Adding more powder after that is rather pointless.. 6.5 Bandit | |||
|
one of us |
I have loaded under those numbers and question the pressure. I am using a Glock21 with a guide rod and 24lb spring and a Colt 1911 GC with a 24lb spring and guide rod. My issues are with the Glock21. I started off using the standard barrel with the unsupported 6 O�clock position. I didn�t see any difference in the primers, but I did see the case bulge. I stopped load development with that barrel and purchased an after market barrel. With the new barrel I worked up to the same load. I don�t have any case bulges, but am I at max pressure? I am below listed values, but every gun is different and most loads are tested in 1911 guns. Shooting over the chronograph is probably the best idea at this point; I would just like a second way of knowing what max pressure for this gun is. | |||
|
one of us |
6.5 bandit with the S&W 44mag, what failed? | |||
|
one of us |
I have been overloading most days for years. Today was typical. I filled the .223 cases to the brim with IMR4895 [27 gr.], seated very long the 60 gr bullet so the bullet will be seated more by the lands, put it in my Ruger #1, and shot it. 3485 fps .001" extractor groove expansion I did it 10 times: I got a 2.1" 5 shot group at 100m the first time. I got a 1.25" 5 shot group at 100m the second time. So much for overloading, I reduced to 25 gr [3325 fps] and spent the rest of the day pursuing an accuracy load with various seating depths. Some guns are stronger than the brass. Some guns will hold together for destroying brass some of the time. Some guns are weak, like the CZ52 pistol, despite what the load books say. | |||
|
one of us |
OK Clark, What is going to break or show signs of over pressure first with my Glock21 doing the 45 super thing? How far can I push the limits on 9mm? I will be shooting it is a Glock26, Berretta92fs, and soon a Glock17. | |||
|
one of us |
ddunn, To be honest I couldnt tell ya what gave on the s&w.. I seen it happen at the range and didnt get a chance to scope it out.. You should check out some of the threads over on glocktalk.com there is always threads on there about glocks blowing up.. http://www.glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=a060a109e94f98018b19a83a1b08be31&threadid=228952&perpage=25&pagenumber=1 there is a rather recent one... here is another one on a 21 blowing up http://www.glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=230134 6.5 Bandit | |||
|
one of us |
I am on Glocktalk. The recent Glock21 Kaboom tells me they didn�t have a minor over powered round. It sounds like a MASSIVE over powered round. I hate to throw out accusations, but something is not right. A police department has a Kaboom. They change ammo. They have another Kaboom. They replace the NEW Glock 21 45ACP with a different Glock gun. Something is wrong here. I see a couple options. 1. Bad batch of Glocks 2. Bad batch of Ammo (slim chance) 3. Technique used in training that causes set back (Hmm, possibilities) 4. Sabotage, range officer substitutes heavy round for normal round. If I had to guess I would say #3. | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: Hey ddunn, I'd suspect the reason you are not getting many responses is because folks are reluctant to tell you the "ONLY WAY" to determine if you are at a SAFE MAX is to: 1. Measure the Groove Expansion (as Clark posted above). 2. Measure the Case Head Expansion. 3. Measure the Pressure Ring Expansion(PRE). Take some Factory Ammo, fire it in your Pistol, measure the PRE(as has been discussed in numerous threads), average those values and write it on the box of Cases. Then develop your Loads in those cases and when you see the same PRE - STOP. The reason that running them over a chronograph can be misleading is because you don't know what Powder the Factory is using. If you end up using a Powder that has a Faster Burning Rate than what the factory used and you try to reach the same Velocity, you will get Pressure that is WAY TOO HIGH. I'd suggest using PRE and if you have a Chronograph use it too - after the Load Development is finished. You won't see anyone recommending Strain Gauges because they are impractical on a Pistol. And pretty much worthless anyhow. | |||
|
one of us |
ddunn, I dont want to start a argument but let me ask you this.. I have seen on that site that Glock says do not shoot reloads for there guns.. If this is true why do you think that is?? IMO Glock's are weak and cant take the pressure like a 1911 could.. I would like to see a glock and a 1911 side by side in a pressure test and see which one gives first.. My bet would be the glock blew before the 1911. Like I said im not trying to start a argument I am just stating my opinion's. I wouldnt try and hotrod glocks I would hate to see something bad happen to you and your toys.. 6.5 Bandit | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: I`m not 6.5 but I can tell you what went on my M29. I bent the crane on a new M29 with a couple of rounds that I had loaded and used often in my Ruger B/H. I don`t remember exactly what the load was- it has been ~30 yrs- but I`m sure the bullet was a 225 Speer HP over "I think" 22.5 or 23 gr of 2400. It was a top book load at the time. The cylinder locked tighter than a drum and went to the smith with 4 rds still in it. | |||
|
<eldeguello> |
Quote: Sniper, it's "OLD and BOLD". The same saying applies to pilots!! | ||
one of us |
6.7 bandit, You have ask a very good question. I think Glock puts that in the manual mainly to protect themselves from lawyers. When I bought my Colt 1911 the manual states not to use reloads. I have seen a manual for a S&W that said not to use any reloads and anything except unjacketed lead. You are defiantly right about the Glock vs. the Colt with factory barrels. The Glock barrel is very loose and unsupported in the 6 o�clock position. The brass will bulge with a hot load. In addition the standard Glock barrel does not work with lead. Glocks are not rifled like other barrels. Most of the Glock Kabooms are either 40S&W or lead related, or both. Lets talk about when things go wrong. From what I have been told when a Glock fails, no body usually gets hurt. The magazine catch breaks and usually that is it. If someone really works at screwing up, the trigger blows out, the front frame guide rods separate from the frame and no body get seriously hurt. I think I am as safe, if not safer working up to 45super with the Glock. Am I right? | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: I have overloaded a Glock 19 [9mm], a Glock 20 [10mm], and a Glock 22 [40 S&W] experimentally for 5 years. I have one other 40 that I have experimented on and a number of 9mm pistols. Typically what happens when I do an incremental work up with a pistol, bullet, and powder is the first sign of pressure will either be a pierced primer or a feed ramp case bulge. If it is a pierced primer, I can go to a thicker magnum or rifle primer, reduce the load a couple grains and work up again. If it is a case bulge, I can get brass with thicker walls and or thicker web, get a better barrel with more chamber support, or weld up the feed ramp and re cut the feed ramp and chamber. The 9mms with .190" feed ramp intrusion into the chamber and 9mm brass has a .160" web, so that .030" of thin unsupported case wall allows me to overload to ~50% extra powder before I see a case bulge. The stock 10mm and 40 sw could not get as much power as the stock 9mms in overload. That is because of the feed ramp intrusion. The 10mm would get a case bulge from 1% on up overload depending on the powder. The 40 sw would get a case bulge at 25% extra powder. The web on 10mm and 40sw brass is .180", but the feed ramp intrusions are from .235" to .250" With a Barsto 10mm barrel I can get up to 82% extra powder with 200 gr. bullets and 800X With a welded feed ramp and re cut feed ramp and chamber, the 40 sw can shoot 142% extra powder with 200 gr. and 800X [all that will fit][This is the IMR max 44 mag 800X powder charge for 200 gr bullets, but the 40 kicks much harder because of the smaller case volume]. The 40 has no unsupported case wall. picture of 9mm brass with case bulge, case hole, and case head failure in incremental work up picture of welded G22 barrel picture of G22 barrel after I re cut the feed ramp and chamber | |||
|
one of us |
Can you show me a pierced primer? Should I expect a loose primers or primer pockets before pierced primers? Should I expect any damage to the gun with a pierced primer? When the Brass failed on the Glock, what damage happened to the gun? | |||
|
one of us |
I don't have a picture of a pierced primer, but it looks like a hole in the primer that is about the size of the firing pin hole in the breech face. Glocks have a rectangular hole, and I can't remember a pierced primer in a Glock. I have only done case bulges in Glocks. The above picture of three cases was in a Kel-Tec P11, and there was a long list of dammage with the case head failure incident. I have had the primer fall out from plenty of rifles, but to get a primer to fall out, good case support is needed. I have done it only in Tokarev pistols. The way I play the game is to look for the case bulge, and go the other way when I see it. | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks all I think I am in the safe, but will begin to inspect and measure my spent cases. In additions I will work over a Chrono as weather permits. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia