THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Starting new loads in 7mmMag...powder choice
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I'm starting some new loads with my 7mmRemMag using 160gr Partitions and Rem brass.

Which powder would you choose (assuming they are available)?

Right now I know I can get Win 780, Retumbo, Ramshot Magnum, and 4831.

I know 4831 so are there any issues with the other three? Particularly temp sensitivity.


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then is not an act, but a habit"--Aristotle (384BC-322BC)
 
Posts: 749 | Location: Central Montana | Registered: 17 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Great topic for me. I just started loading for a new 7mmRemMag. I received 200 rounds of Hornady 120gr from a friend so I'm breaking in my barrel with those.

So far I used H4350 with less than stellar results. I just loaded 20 rds up using W760. I am hoping to give them a shot this weekend. WIll let you know.
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've never had luck with 4350 (of any type) in my 7mmMag.

I used Ramshot hunter once and had delay fires in sub zero temps so I'm pretty leery of a new things.


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then is not an act, but a habit"--Aristotle (384BC-322BC)
 
Posts: 749 | Location: Central Montana | Registered: 17 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My favorite powder for the 7 RM is IMR7828. I works great with most bullet weights (140 thru 175).
 
Posts: 142 | Location: Sacramento, CA | Registered: 15 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
I have a 7mag Weatherby Vangaurd and have tested H 4831SC, IMR 4350, RL-19, Rl-22, and Win780. Of the five H4831 may have not been the fastest but was far more accurate from my rifle so thats what I stuck with....I was shooting 160 grn Nos Accubonds.


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
rl22


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40103 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
quote:
rl22

thumb Or better yet MRP


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I use a load of 60.0 gr. of IMR4350 using the 160 gr. Partition. I also use Remington brass and Federal 215 primers. This load shots very well in 2 different 7mm Remington Mags. It has worked well on African game, Mule Deer, Blacktail Deer, and Bears.

Greg
 
Posts: 201 | Location: Sonoma, California | Registered: 06 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Rumor has it that Supreme 780 is very similar to MRP (unless I miss read it may be the same).

So here's the question. Is RL-22 temp sensitive?

I also here that lot to lot variations are fairly extreme for RL-22. I'm not against extruded powder since I'm using 4350 in my 300WSM.


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then is not an act, but a habit"--Aristotle (384BC-322BC)
 
Posts: 749 | Location: Central Montana | Registered: 17 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
IMR4350 worked best for me.
 
Posts: 1287 | Registered: 11 January 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Two powders work very well in my 7mm Mag, H-4831SC and RL-22. They are all I've ever used come to think about it.




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well after looking at some other info, I've decided that I don't want RL-22 due to the temp sensitivity and lot to lot variations. It looks like a fantastic powder but the extreme temp swings locally make me leery.

It looks like Retumbo might be my choice because it seems to be temp insensitive and fairly consistent between lots.

I've tried IMR4350 and XMR4350 in 139 and 154 bullets and had sub-par performance.


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then is not an act, but a habit"--Aristotle (384BC-322BC)
 
Posts: 749 | Location: Central Montana | Registered: 17 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
quote:
I've decided that I don't want RL-22 due to the temp sensitivity and lot to lot variations

I will admit to having seen a several grain varition between my first lott of rl22 and the next. However the last 2 lotts have been gr for gr. Unless you are going to shoot your 7mag a heck of a lot if the lott variations worry you buy 5# that over 2200rds in a 7mag.

As to temp. I've read all the press usually by one powder firm trying to hype their own. Hodgdon had a table on their web site a couple years back trying to show how great their extreme powders were as to temp. In that table RL22 had a 75fps variation over a 125deg temp spread. http://www.ask.com/bar?q=hodgd...3D&tsp=1256150099610 For some reason I can't get it to link to the table so you will need to click on "take the extreme tour"
Any powder loaded to a max load at a low temp and then taken to high temp can cause issues.

I have a wildcat 280PDK looks like an improved 7Gibbs I load it to 7mag velocity. A load worked up at around 70-80 deg has worked for me from sea level to 12,000' and from -10 to 114. RL 22 is my go to powder for my wildcat as well as 7mag and 7stw.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
H-4831 OR RL-22
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
IMR 7828 for bullets 160 grns. or heavier, IMR4831 for the lighter weights have worked best for me.
 
Posts: 135 | Location: Colorado Mtns. | Registered: 07 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Has anyone tried WC860 (surplus BMG) powder in this cartridge?
 
Posts: 871 | Registered: 13 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jpl:
Has anyone tried WC860 (surplus BMG) powder in this cartridge?

fishingTried 5010 and 5020 50 BMG surplus and could not achieve reasonable velocities before I ran out of powder room ,and got a whole bunch of unburned powder. While discussing this with a long time reloader he said"perhaps you're lucky it did not all burn. If it did you might find that you had too much." Later, experimenting with duplex loads I found out that he may have been correct. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
I tried 5010 in a 7stw with 160s and found while I had great accuracy it was very slow. Velocities under 7mag levels.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grumulkin
posted Hide Post
I've found RL-22 excellent for both 140 and 160 gr. bullets in the 7mm Remington Magnum. I use Federal 210M (large rifle as opposed to large rifle magnum) primers in mine.

Maybe RL-22 is temperature sensitive but I found that there was a 2 to 3 grain (maybe a bit more) range in powder increments where the accuracy was the same and the bullets hit in the same place. If you kept your load toward the middle of that range temperature sensitivity shouldn't be an issue (though I doubt it's really an issue anyway).
 
Posts: 2911 | Location: Ohio, U.S.A. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
RL-22, H4831 and IMR 7828 would be excellent starting powders.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Col K
posted Hide Post
Damn! Looks like I'm the only one burning H1000. My 7 mag loves it with Sierra 175gr.
 
Posts: 350 | Location: GA by way of PA, OH, KY, TX, VA, and NC | Registered: 10 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
RL 19, RL-22, H1000
 
Posts: 656 | Location: Nebraska | Registered: 06 January 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've used a few different powders and had best results across the board using Retumbo...recently bought five pounds of it!
 
Posts: 66 | Registered: 05 August 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Rob1SG
posted Hide Post
My 7mm RM loves Retumbo in 160 grs and above. 150 and below I like RL 22.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Edmond,OK | Registered: 14 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigChev4x4:
I use a load of 60.0 gr. of IMR4350 using the 160 gr. Partition. I also use Remington brass and Federal 215 primers. This load shots very well in 2 different 7mm Remington Mags. It has worked well on African game, Mule Deer, Blacktail Deer, and Bears.

Greg


Same load here except for Federal brass
 
Posts: 188 | Location: Late,Great Golden State | Registered: 28 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigChev4x4:
I use a load of 60.0 gr. of IMR4350 using the 160 gr. Partition. I also use Remington brass and Federal 215 primers. This load shots very well in 2 different 7mm Remington Mags. It has worked well on African game, Mule Deer, Blacktail Deer, and Bears.

Greg


I have shot this load in my 24" stainless 700 with a 160 Accubond. It chronyed just over 3000........while 69grs of Rel22 pushes a 140 TSX over 3300.
 
Posts: 588 | Location: Sherwood Park,Alberta,Canada | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gwindrider1:
IMR 7828 for bullets 160 grns. or heavier, IMR4831 for the lighter weights have worked best for me.

Me too. I like H4831sc as well, IMR4831 too, but I get just as good accuracy but upto 100fps more vel. w/ IMR7828.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've found the 7m/m Rem mag to be one of those "funky" cartridges that might do as well on 4350 as it will with 7828. It is also a potent hunting cartridge when the proper selections are made. That said, it and the 257 Roberts are my favorite sub 30 calibre hunting choices. My model 70 does well with N-160 and 160 grain partition bullets producing 3050 f/s. I can get another 100f/s with slower powders, but the accuracy necessary for long range wasn't there.
 
Posts: 3889 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the powder mfgr now lists the new RL-17 at a top performer for the 7mm Rem Mag in some bullet weights.
That seems very wierd when examined next to
the RL-19 and RL-22 loads but the benchrest guys
are ranting and raving about it being in a new
revolutionary technology for higher velocities
with the 6mm cartridge. The other new technology powder is the H100V Hybred ( or something like that) Modern science ought
to give us something better every now and then.
 
Posts: 31 | Registered: 28 December 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've had the best luck with RL-25 and IMR 7828 in the 7mm rem mag. I've tried 4350 and 4831, but in my opinion they're too fast burning for this cartridge. I used to use RL-22 but tried RL-25 and now prefer it.
 
Posts: 1173 | Registered: 14 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia