THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
One powder to another
 Login/Join
 
<lynxtrapper>
posted
Im the guy who needed IMR Data for a .300 RUM. Still cant find any. Is there a powder out there that performs the same as IMR 4350?
Looking for direct comparison to Alliant and or Hogdon. (150 gn scirocco and 200 gn Nos.Par.)
 
Reply With Quote
<auto>
posted
Nothing will be exactly the same as IMR 4350, however AA4350 is similar, even if slightly faster. H4350 is slightly slower.Reloader-19 is a bit slower but probably will shoot okay. If you haven't found any load data yet, call Sierra bullets at their toll free #. They have a ballistician there to help you. Of course they like it when you use their bullets, too. Same for Hornady, and Nosler. Hope this helps. Most loading books have a burn-rate chart printed in them somewhere.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
As the previous poster said, H 4350 is slightly slower than IMR 4350. Thus, you would use slightly less of the IMR 4350 to get similar velocities and pressures -- my estimation is that the difference would be about 1 grain in 40, so if you are using 40 gr of H 4350, then the corresponding load would be about 39 grains of IMR 4350, or 78 gr of IMR 4350 to 80 gr of H 4350 (but note that this is a rough approximation, and you should start lower and work up).

But, if you are loading for a 300 RUM, why are you trying to use any of the 4350 powders or RL-19? Those powders are a bit too fast for that caliber, so you will almost certainly get better results with slower burning powders such as H 4831, IMR 7828, and RL 22 or RL 25.

 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ricciardelli
posted Hide Post
IMR-4350 is not really a choice powder for the 300 RUM...actually, the only IMR powder that is suitable is IMR-7828.

Take a look at http://stevespages.com/page8c.htm

------------------
http://stevespages.com/page8.htm

 
Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Zero Drift
posted Hide Post
lynxtrapper - Contact IMR - http://www.imrpowder.com
 
Posts: 10780 | Location: Test Tube | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
<lynxtrapper>
posted
I was only using 4350 as a place to start. I thought that 7828 or Rel 22 was the better choice but as yet had no data on these powders. I have recently found them and will be using REL 22 or hogdon 1000. IMR Has no data at all for 300RUM.
quote:
Originally posted by LE270:
As the previous poster said, H 4350 is slightly slower than IMR 4350. Thus, you would use slightly less of the IMR 4350 to get similar velocities and pressures -- my estimation is that the difference would be about 1 grain in 40, so if you are using 40 gr of H 4350, then the corresponding load would be about 39 grains of IMR 4350, or 78 gr of IMR 4350 to 80 gr of H 4350 (but note that this is a rough approximation, and you should start lower and work up).

But, if you are loading for a 300 RUM, why are you trying to use any of the 4350 powders or RL-19? Those powders are a bit too fast for that caliber, so you will almost certainly get better results with slower burning powders such as H 4831, IMR 7828, and RL 22 or RL 25.


 
Reply With Quote
<lynxtrapper>
posted
I like 7828 but havnt found 300 RUM Data from IMR. Do you know of any??
quote:
Originally posted by ricciardelli:
IMR-4350 is not really a choice powder for the 300 RUM...actually, the only IMR powder that is suitable is IMR-7828.

Take a look at http://stevespages.com/page8c.htm


 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia