Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I did some interesting comparisons between chronographed velocities and formulas I picked up in ballistic books over the years. .338 Win Mag : 250 GK bullet, charge decreased from 70.5 (clocked at 2743 ft") to 68.2 gn. chrono : 2704 ft" � calculated : 2671 ft" = variance 1 % .308 Win (7,62 Nato) : from 150 MK / 44.0 gn (clocked at 2805 ft") to 168 MK / 41.5. chrono : 2546 ft" � calculated : 2549 ft" = variance .1 % In both cases, the difference melts away within shot to shot variation. Not bad for old timers formulas ! [ 07-24-2003, 13:51: Message edited by: Andr� Mertens ] | ||
|
one of us |
Andre': Whose formulas, and what are they? | |||
|
one of us |
Andre', But will the formulas give you the velocity if it is unknow? If the velocity is know can they give you the charge change required to hit a desired velocity? It would be nice to run some numbers that will allow you to adjust your loads to get them where you want to be a little faster than add/subtract powder and re-chrono, several times . | |||
|
one of us |
You have to start with a known velocity. As a make do, you can use a manual but a starting chrono velocity taking your own variables into consideration (rifle, components, etc.)is the most accurate in my experience. I use 2 different calculations (to chek AND confirm the other) from different sources (one from Vihtavuori and I forgot where the other one came from). I've incorporated the formulae in a Excel form. If desired, I can e-mail it to parties interested so they can play with it and crosscheck my own findings (I will even push the courtesy and translate in English, ain't that courteous ). | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia