The Accurate Reloading Forums
Ballistic formula vs. chrono or when theory meets practice

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/38510366

24 July 2003, 22:50
Andre Mertens
Ballistic formula vs. chrono or when theory meets practice
I did some interesting comparisons between chronographed velocities and formulas I picked up in ballistic books over the years.

.338 Win Mag : 250 GK bullet, charge decreased from 70.5 (clocked at 2743 ft") to 68.2 gn.
chrono : 2704 ft" � calculated : 2671 ft" = variance 1 %

.308 Win (7,62 Nato) : from 150 MK / 44.0 gn (clocked at 2805 ft") to 168 MK / 41.5.
chrono : 2546 ft" � calculated : 2549 ft" = variance .1 %

In both cases, the difference melts away within shot to shot variation.

Not bad for old timers formulas !

[ 07-24-2003, 13:51: Message edited by: Andr� Mertens ]
24 July 2003, 23:50
KLN
Andre':

Whose formulas, and what are they?
25 July 2003, 13:15
Byron
Andre',

But will the formulas give you the velocity if it is unknow? If the velocity is know can they give you the charge change required to hit a desired velocity?

It would be nice to run some numbers that will allow you to adjust your loads to get them where you want to be a little faster than add/subtract powder and re-chrono, several times [Big Grin] .
26 July 2003, 09:33
Andre Mertens
You have to start with a known velocity. As a make do, you can use a manual but a starting chrono velocity taking your own variables into consideration (rifle, components, etc.)is the most accurate in my experience. I use 2 different calculations (to chek AND confirm the other) from different sources (one from Vihtavuori and I forgot where the other one came from). I've incorporated the formulae in a Excel form. If desired, I can e-mail it to parties interested so they can play with it and crosscheck my own findings (I will even push the courtesy and translate in English, ain't that courteous [Wink] ).