Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
one of us |
I am searching for current data for the 500 3". There is plenty for 3031 and 4831. I'm looking for newer data with modern powders. Thanks. Good luck and good shooting. In Memory of Officer Nik Green, #198, Oklahoma Highway Patrol Troop G...Murdered in the line of duty 12-26-03...A Good Man, A Good Officer, and A Good Friend gone too soon | ||
|
One of Us![]() |
Reloader 15 is the only way to go. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J. Lane Easter, DVM A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991. | |||
|
one of us |
I was told one of the VV powders produces less recoil for similar vehicles as others. Anyone know if this is true? Good luck and good shooting. In Memory of Officer Nik Green, #198, Oklahoma Highway Patrol Troop G...Murdered in the line of duty 12-26-03...A Good Man, A Good Officer, and A Good Friend gone too soon | |||
|
One of Us![]() |
R 15 produces the least amount of recoil of any propellant I have tried in the .500 NE and I have spent a fair amount of time behind one. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J. Lane Easter, DVM A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991. | |||
|
One of Us![]() |
The only way I can see that recoil can really be reduced at similar velocities is to use a faster-burning powder where less is required, thus reducing the weight of total ejecta. Would you feel the difference from five or 10 grains in 600-plus? I doubt it but people swear they can. | |||
|
One of Us![]() |
Load some 570s to 2150 fps with IMR 4350 and some with R-15 shoot them and tell me your verdict. “Perceived” recoil is noticeably less with R-15. Pretty much universally recognized by .500 NE shooters. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J. Lane Easter, DVM A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991. | |||
|
One of Us![]() |
That would take me a little while - finding the rifle (plus money for another safari ![]() So, tell us, what's the difference in weight of the powder and any fillers? | |||
|
One of Us![]() |
Sambarman your first sentence is true but missing in the equation is the powder ejecta velocity which is taken into account in the recoil calculation. This velocity is standardised at 4700 fps and while a few grains of powder more or less in the recoil calculation to give the recoil velocity of the gun may only make a few points difference in fps recoil, when the recoil energy of the gun is calculated it adds up to a few more or less ftlbs of energy. Recoil energy of the gun is more likely what is felt thumping back into your shoulder hence a few grains less of the faster burning RL15 powder compared with IMR4350 (RL17) will likely translate through to some noticeable felt recoil reduction. Similarly with IMR4831 powder, one of the best for the 404 Jeffery cartridge, but producing noticeably more recoil than RL15 and other faster burners. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia