THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
i know this is pretty much impossible but....
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
....is there one powder that is "pretty dang good" (not "the best") for

.30/06 (rem 700 and m1 garand)
.308 (sav 99)
.223 (mini-14)
.22/250 (ruger m77)

my dad refuses to buy more than one kind of powder and is currently using up the last of his IMR 4895. i am thinking that varget might give some better performance and be more versatile.

any suggestions?
 
Posts: 51246 | Location: Chinook, Montana | Registered: 01 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
When I read the list, my mind jumped right to 4895.

The other powder that works for me in the 308, 223 and 22-250 (I don't own an '06 so I don't know about that) is Hodgdon's BLC(2)


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12691 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
fjold -

i was also thinking BLC2 but it doesn't seem to be available up here. another one i considered along with varget is one of the RLs (15?).

maybe the crazy old man got it right the first time after all with 4895?
 
Posts: 51246 | Location: Chinook, Montana | Registered: 01 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
4895 or 4064


The only easy day is yesterday!
 
Posts: 2758 | Location: Northern Minnesota | Registered: 22 September 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
4895, 4064, varget, RL15.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hivelosity
posted Hide Post
if you can get it wc846 would be a prety good choice and cheap.
may have a little muzzle flash in the 308 and 30/06
 
Posts: 2134 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 26 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What ramrod340 said!!

+1!!


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pegleg:
4895 or 4064


+1
 
Posts: 8169 | Location: humboldt | Registered: 10 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tasunkawitko:
....is there one powder that is "pretty dang good" (not "the best") for

.30/06 (rem 700 and m1 garand)
.308 (sav 99)
.223 (mini-14)
.22/250 (ruger m77)

my dad refuses to buy more than one kind of powder and is currently using up the last of his IMR 4895. i am thinking that varget might give some better performance and be more versatile.

any suggestions?

I'd prefer a second powder but that seems to not be an option....In which case I'd get Varget as it's a bit easier to funnel and measure.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
H4895
 
Posts: 317 | Location: Texas Panhandle | Registered: 09 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I'd prefer a second powder but that seems to not be an option....In which case I'd get Varget as it's a bit easier to funnel and measure.


IMR4895 is as close to "universal" as one can get, but Varget would be my second choice.
 
Posts: 3889 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If I could only have one powder it would be Varget I've used it in everything from .223 to .375H&H.
 
Posts: 59 | Registered: 03 June 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i agree with ramrod340
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Red C.
posted Hide Post
We're picking just one powder for all those applications, right? Then I'd go with Varget.


Red C.
Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.
 
Posts: 909 | Location: SE Oklahoma | Registered: 18 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The problem with anything that'll do everything is that it isn't particularly good at anything.

It's something I call "Swiss Army Knife effect"
yeah it can do a whole bunch of things, but it
doesn't do any of them well.

Yeah 4895 (either "H" or IMR) is versatile, as is 4064,
I personally use them both, but there are a lot of things that can be done better with something else.

Have you considered trying to talk him into adding different propellants to his bench?

I look for what propellant is best for a particular cartridge.

For example the 30-06 will do better with IMR4350 (or RL19)
The 223Rem really shines with Benchmark
(If you want "low flash" loads for "Tactical" use
in a semi-auto RL7)

22-250? Varget!

308, hard to do better than ww748 but actually here IMR4895 is a good choice.

AD


If I provoke you into thinking then I've done my good deed for the day!
Those who manage to provoke themselves into other activities have only themselves to blame.

*We Band of 45-70er's*

35 year Life Member of the NRA

NRA Life Member since 1984
 
Posts: 4601 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 21 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Tas,
In no way do I mean to be critical of your dad, My dad is 86 and set in his ways. To try to change his mind on something is almost impossible. If he is happy operating within a narrow band of mediocrity, why try to make him change. Would he even use varget or Blc-2 as opposed to 4895?

Remember, you can lead a guitar to water but you can't tune a fish.
GWB
 
Posts: 23752 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Gary Surko
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tasunkawitko:
....is there one powder that is "pretty dang good" (not "the best") for

.30/06 (rem 700 and m1 garand)
.308 (sav 99)
.223 (mini-14)
.22/250 (ruger m77)

my dad refuses to buy more than one kind of powder and is currently using up the last of his IMR 4895. i am thinking that varget might give some better performance and be more versatile.

any suggestions?



Why is it that your father refuses to buy more than one powder? Why don't he buy what he wants and you try something you want?


Political correctness offends me.
 
Posts: 668 | Location: Hastings, Michigan | Registered: 23 April 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
to all - thanks for the replies so far. i agree about the swiss army knife approach, but he just wants the gun to go bang and the pill to hit within minute of deer. he's got at least 7 different kinds of brass, his lee loaders and his dippers and he's ready to do some loading.

i told him i would see if there was a "better" swiss army knife than IMR 4895 since he was just about out of it and was about to commit to an 8-lb. keg of the stuff. not sure why he wants only one brand of powder, but he was adamant about it, so i figure it comes down to keeping it uncomplicated. i tried to talk to him about separating the brass (or sticking to one brand), experimenting with powders to find the best for each cartridge/rifle etc., but this is the way he wants it, so i say live and let live.

i initially was thinking of varget since that is a powder that i have that does very well and also, if i remember correctly, has a very good tolerance for changes in temperature, which is a factor up here in northern montana. i'm not married to it and if his IMR 4895 will do "good 'nuff," then i'll just get him a keg of that.

FWIW, his loads all come off the charge table that comes with lee loaders, so they are all mild (barely starting loads) and should be safe even with the thick lake city brass and military brass, but i worry about the accuracy he is going to get - once he gets the bug i am sure that he will embark on the quest for ultimate accuracy that we all enjoy!
 
Posts: 51246 | Location: Chinook, Montana | Registered: 01 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I am currently using 4895 in all of those cartridges, as my first and best choice. A slightly slower powder will give more velocity in the .30-06, but when used in an automatic a slower powder will also likely yield excessive gas port pressures.

4895 is a fine-grained extruded powder which meters extremely well. Being a single-base extruded powder, it also exhibits fairly linear pressure-velocity increases, thus no sudden pressure surprises with half-grain incremental increases.

While BL-C2 is of similar burning rate to 4895, I find it very inconsistent in a .22-250 and, though I've never tried it in a .30-06, I think the '06 case is capacious enough to cause BL-c2 to do some potentially funny things.

Incidentally, in my experience, all of the 4895s are pretty close to one another in burning speed and characteristics, and the lot-to-lot variations are among the least of any powder.
 
Posts: 13243 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
H4895 is one of their Extreme powders...meant to stand up to extreme heat and cold. It would be my first choice as an all-around
powder and should fill the bill in your dad's situation.
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Have not yet, but I'm ready to start reloading for new my AR 15.

Even though it shoots 5.56, I'm gonna stay with .223

The only two powders I have on the shelf are are IMR 4227 and IMR 4064.

I'll be using those first, since I have recipes for them behind a 55 gr bullet.
 
Posts: 103 | Location: Columbus, Georgia | Registered: 08 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of seafire2
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
4895, 4064, varget, RL15.


Yeah if it was availability that pushed me to just one powder.. these would be my choices...

but I'd pirate some 4198, SR4759, and some Blue Dot away from prying eyes...


Life Member: The American Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Jan 20, 2009.. Prisoner in Dumocrat 'Occupied America', Partisan in the 'Save America' Underground


Beavis..... James Beavis..... Of Her Majesty's Secret Service..... Spell Check Division



"Posterity — you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
John Quincy Adams

A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him "Why do you carry a 45?" The Ranger responded, "Because they don't make a 46."

Duhboy....Nuttier than Squirrel Poop...



 
Posts: 9316 | Location: Between Confusion and Lunacy ( Portland OR & San Francisco CA) | Registered: 12 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have done all 4 with 4895.
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
h335 -- try a can of it, fellas, REALLY.. compare it with either 4895, and you'll leave the old 4895 for h335

works great in 223 and 550 express, with all stops between doing great, fast, accurate loads.


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 39574 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
h335 -- try a can of it, fellas, REALLY.. compare it with either 4895, and you'll leave the old 4895 for h335

works great in 223 and 550 express, with all stops between doing great, fast, accurate loads.


Your experience is a great deal different than mine.

H335 is spec W-844, a powder formulated for the 5.56/.223 Remington. I use it in that cartridge with great success.

However, it does really funny things in larger capacity cases: Whereas its burning rate appears to be almost exactly that of BL-C2/WW-748/WC-846 (all the same spec powder) in a case the size of a .223, a significant gap in apparent burning rate opens up in larger cases. I would NOT recommend H335 in any case larger than those on the .222 case head, or perhaps the 7.62x39 case.

Having tried H335 (which I dearly love in .222/.223/.222Mag) in .22-250, .243, and .308, I can tell you that it is just not a consistent powder in those larger cases.
 
Posts: 13243 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
H335 is a spherical powder so it does meter well. But for all around use in the extreme heat and cold of Montana, where his dad intends to use it, I'd still opt for H4895.
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Have used H335 in .458 AR which is a huge capacity case and in .376/.416 Steyr Improved which is a merely large case ... works great!

I would have recommended BL(c)-2. Have used it in all of the cartridges mentioned.


Mike

--------------
DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ...
Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com
 
Posts: 6199 | Location: Charleston, WV | Registered: 31 August 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia