The Accurate Reloading Forums
10.75x68 max fps ???

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/1751028481

26 January 2013, 23:17
AllenBosely
10.75x68 max fps ???
Just wondering why the 10.75x68 with a 400gn bullet is maxed out
at 2200 or so fps, but the .416 Taylor with basically the same
powder capacity can get 2300-2350 fairly comfortably & some push
it up to 2400 fps.

Especially if the 10.75x68 is seated out to 3.40 capacity is even
a little more than the .416 Taylor.

I was woundering what the limiting factor in the 10.75x68 was.

Is there a reason it can't be ran at higher pressures than CIP
specs, more in line with the Taylor?

Both built on a 98 Mauser using current barrels, brass ect?

From my limited ( to say the least!) knowledge, I would think
the 10.75x68 could do 2300-2350 like the .416 Taylor so set up.

I mean yes it will exceed CIP specs.

But there must be something I'm now understanding correctly.

say if the 10.75x68 cartridge didn't exist but the case does,
I 'wildcat' the case with a 3.40 COL & 400gn bullet.

Would I not run it up to 2350 fps based on case capacity,
at pressures within normal the range of contemperary cartridges?

Cheers, Allen


It's a Mauser thing, you wouldn't understand.
27 January 2013, 04:02
ramrod340
Allen,

All things equal same net capacity same barrel same bullet dia yes velocity should be the same.

Take a 416 Taylor run it in QL with a 400gr but limited to the 10.75x68 pressure of 47,800 and velocity limits drop to 4200fps.

Bullet dia can have some affect easier to get pressure in a 416 vs 423 with the same bullet weight. Different pressure curves can impact velocity potential.

I show the 68 to normally have a shorter OAL so seating out to 3.34 might require throat work. Would the brass or historical action take the pressure I have no clue. I'd not bet my life on it.

Short answer is in theory you could load the 68 to equal a Taylor with a larger string of buts. To me leave the old loaded the way they were intented. If you want 2400fps with a 400gr simply go to a newer option.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
27 January 2013, 07:07
jeffeosso
when i EVER get my 10,75x68 back.. which is throated and setup for crimping on the groove of a hornady DGX 400gr bullet, I will let you know ...

i wanted mine setup for a longish throat and OAL


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
27 January 2013, 09:23
AllenBosely
Lol Jeffesso! Ok please hurry up & get it done please! Smiler

Paul, I was thinking going to a longer COL same as if one
long throated a 7x57.

Using a M98 action to build either a 416 Taylor or 10.75x68.

Use a LW barrel in .423 and Hornaber brass.

I would 'think' it would be the same.

But what do I know?! lol

Intersting.

Cheers, Allen


It's a Mauser thing, you wouldn't understand.
27 January 2013, 09:52
ramrod340
Allen,

Just a little more info. The 68 has a 3gr higher gross capacity but due to its shape even at the same OAL the 68s net capacity will be about 3 grs less than the Taylor.

So a little less net, bigger dia bullet loaded to Taylor pressures QL calculates the 68 to be about 50-75fps slower.

All that said as long as the brass can handle the pressure then I think you should build what you want. tu2


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
27 January 2013, 20:00
AllenBosely
Paul thanks for the info.

I find this Intersting & fun. Looking forward to getting
more info from testing & checking it out.

Cheers, Allen


It's a Mauser thing, you wouldn't understand.
27 January 2013, 20:24
AllenBosely
Jeffesso, what is your COL with the DGX 400gn crimped
in the canalure?

Cheers,Allen


It's a Mauser thing, you wouldn't understand.