Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
one of us |
So i am alittle bored & thought I would play w/ the dig. camera & post this. I test all of my hunting bullets in wet pack before I take them after game. The bullet on the left is from wet pack. The one on the right is from a kudu bull (the only NP I have ever recovered). Impact vel. for both would be about 2600fps. As you can see, they are almost identical. The only diff. I can see in wetpack testing is the penetration. The bullet goes about 19" in wetpack & the one from the Kudu was over 24" (L. front chest & recovered near the last rib on the R.) ![]() | ||
|
one of us |
There's a reason why the Nosler Partition has been the standard by which all other expanding hunting bullets are judged! | |||
|
one of us![]() |
I get the same performance out of the 210 NP whether firing from my .338-06 or my .338 WSM. Great elk bullets. Max | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia