THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
.338 210GRnp
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted
So i am alittle bored & thought I would play w/ the dig. camera & post this. I test all of my hunting bullets in wet pack before I take them after game. The bullet on the left is from wet pack. The one on the right is from a kudu bull (the only NP I have ever recovered). Impact vel. for both would be about 2600fps. As you can see, they are almost identical. The only diff. I can see in wetpack testing is the penetration. The bullet goes about 19" in wetpack & the one from the Kudu was over 24" (L. front chest & recovered near the last rib on the R.)
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
There's a reason why the Nosler Partition has been the standard by which all other expanding hunting bullets are judged!
 
Posts: 863 | Location: Mtns of the Desert Southwest, USA | Registered: 26 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
I get the same performance out of the 210 NP whether firing from my .338-06 or my .338 WSM. Great elk bullets.
Max
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia