Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I know this is a general question as there are a vast variety of hunting scenarios. If you could design your own binoc. what would it be. For me: Durable, simple, light, bright, low maintenance/ TOUGH 1) Under 30 oz 2) 9X45 or 10X45 (4.5-5 exit pupil) 3) Individual eye diopters (each barrel) remove the center adjuster. Mark white letters on a black back ground so you can see your focus placement in the dark. Audible click adjustment. 4) Poro design for greater depth of field and a more robust alignment. 5)+18 mm eye relief 6) Flat field eye piece 7) Triplet objective lenses with one fluorite crystal lens like Kowa produces 8) Hydrophobic lens coatings 9) Scratch resistant lens coatings 10) Rubber eye cups; Ditch the twist outs: They get dirt and ice in them and cease to work efficiently. 11) Rubber armoring 12) Argon gas purging (anti fogging) 13) BAK 4 prisms with HD Schott glass 14) Blackened lense edges like Leopold produces to reduce glare 15) Darkened internal barrels like Leica produces to further reduce glare. 16) Index matched lens and the best lens coatings available. | ||
|
One of Us |
Swarovski 8x32, these are my personal favorites. | |||
|
one of us |
Your perfect hunting binoculars exhibit a number of features which are highly desirable, but the most desirable of all is the individual eye focus with detents to keep them where you put them. Center focusing is (1) complicated to use and most people do it backward, (2) is easily moved out of focus accidentally, (3) is more expensive to produce, and (4) is inherently weaker and more subject to damage, (5) creates another mechanism which has to be sealed and is subject to moisture intrusion. I'm not sure where you find binos with all of your preferences. I have a Minox model no longer made which is 9.5x45 that comes close; but my favorites are the old Japanese Leupold 10x40 porros which do many of the things you like. I also have the old Leupold 10x40 roof prism model that is theoretically a little less efficient in light transmission and provides a tad less depth perception due to the closer spacing of the objectives, but it is more compact. Unfortunately, almost no one makes an IF binocular these days: Binocular sales are driven by birders and birders really do need instant refocusing as they watch tiny objects flit from tree to tree from 10 to 40 yards -- an impossible task for binoculars without instant refocusing. But if your deer or elk goes from 40 yards to 10 yards in seconds, then you don't need binoculars -- you don't even need a scope as you'll be shooting from the hip. | |||
|
One of Us |
The list suggests eezrdr knows more about the subject than most of us, but I might dare to express an ignoramus's opinion. Once you get over 6x, constant focus adjustment by means of each barrel sounds like a PITA to me, even if it does give more water resistance. Reasonable resolution and light weight have become my main requirements, and I find my humble Nikon Prostaff 10x42 roof prisms the best I've come across in that price range. With thick straps dragging and the rubber lens covers in place, mine weigh 600 grams (21oz) on our kitchen scales. If your top-end 10x42s weigh less then that, God bless you. | |||
|
One of Us |
10x42 for open mountains. 10x56 or 10x50 for western hunting non-backpack trips. I think these would perfect for exotic hunts. 8x56 or 10x56 for sitting in a box blind, hochsitz, or treestand, unless you live in South TExas and need more magnification. 8x42 if you are bowhunting close cover. 8x56 if you are stalking in close cover. 15x56 or 20x60 or something like that for putting on a tripod and finding game. There you have it the perfect pair of binos. | |||
|
One of Us |
Most of the time, I use my 10X42's and they are all range finding binos-either Swarovskis or Leicas. I have a couple of pairs of Swarovski 15X56's for the tripod, in addition to 3 Swarovski spotting scopes. | |||
|
One of Us |
It is a great question and one that is impossible for me to answer. However, there are a few things that I do like. For my hunting in the West, I choose 10x42's with the 8x42 a close second. Range finding binoculars. After buying a pair over the summer and using them this fall, I will always choose this option. I do not like carrying a separate range finder. Quality and customer service. Choose a brand that will be backed by the manufacturer. I have had great luck with Swarovski customer service. As far as the "mechanics" of the binoculars, eezridr sound like he has a lot better information than I do. I would also say, buy as good of quality as you are able. The Euro glass is worth it in my opinion | |||
|
One of Us |
For me, swaro 10x32 el. Plenty of magnification and light weight. I use for bowhunting whitetails to rifle dall sheep and all in between NRA Patron member | |||
|
one of us |
I assume you say that because the higher powers will focus to infinity further away, leaving them unfocused at shorter ranges. While this is true, even at 10X the infinite focus range is close enough no adjustment is required in most uses. After all, when you are hunting "big" game (deer and up) you have little need of binoculars if the range is as short as the infinity focus distance of a 10X glass. There are instances when I've needed shorter focus -- usually when hunting in thick brush/timber where it is useful to have a low-powered binocular focused close to help pick out an animal among the branches and leaves. But most often the hunting use of binoculars is to scan at great distances or help identify and evaluate game at moderate distances, all well beyond the infinity focus distance of a 10X glass. Check out what the out-of-production Japanese Leupold IF's bring on eBay and you'll see that a lot of hunters appreciate the IF feature. | |||
|
one of us |
For all round big game hunting, I`m very pleased with my Swaro SLC 10x42, weight 900 grams. The main reason is the terrain and animals we hunt (moose, red-and roe deer in semi open terrain, clear cuts and agricultural landscape). Often in dusk and dawn, low light, moon lit fields with frost or snow (legal where I live). Friends who only hunt woods and timber in daylight make do with lesser binoculars, so it very much boils down to what we hunt, and under which circumstances. For day light use, I also have a light and handy Zeiss Conquest 10x30, weight 640 grams. Arild Iversen. | |||
|
One of Us |
Stonecreek: I had a pair of those and they were stolen. Much of my experience is based on them. Funny you caught that.
| |||
|
one of us |
8x32 Liecas are my all time favorite, because you can hold them off hand when scopeing a sidehill, beyond 7 or 8 you need a rest to judge a trophy head and its easier to see an animal under a bush bedded with the smaller binocs IMO..If more is needed a spotting scope the best option..Ive often wondered if I wouldn't be better off with a good pair of binocs and an iron sighted rifle, given such a choice over a scoped rifle and no binocs..???? Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120 rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com | |||
|
One of Us |
Zeiss 7x42 BGAT* Leight, very easy in the hand and superb optics. Mine are 20 years old and still superb. They stopped making them a few years ago - don't know why, but if you find a pair, jump on them fast. | |||
|
one of us |
Eezridr: When I come across one of the old Leupold IF models in good condition at a fair price I grab it. I happen to have one more of the 10x40 roof prism models than I currently need (I bid on two auctions at the same time and unexpectedly won both of them). Drop me a line if you need one and I'll try to make you a price you're comfortable with. | |||
|
One of Us |
I have used Zeiss 10 X 40 BGAT binoculars for many years. I think they would meet your requirements. | |||
|
one of us |
My fav is Leica 8x32. I have owned and tried many RF binos; they are good, but for LR shooting, nothing comes close to the SIG 2400 RF; I have been using it extensively and it is spot on. Only RF that takes into account spin drift and aerodynamic jump; unlike most RF binos, uses an embedded software app, not lookup tables with angle and enviro correction factors. | |||
|
One of Us |
I am loving my 10x42 EL Swarovski binoculars. So much that I will probably sell my 8x42 Razor HD Vortex binoculars...something I thought I would never do. "Let me start off with two words: Made in America" | |||
|
One of Us |
I have no regrets with my 10x50 Leupold's. Wifey liked them so well had to get her a pair. Keep yer powder dry and yer knife sharp. | |||
|
One of Us |
I'd never thought about the 6x focus quite that way, and must admit I've never had any binos that small. I used to use various small 8x models but found the exit pupils too small to give good field of view when wearing glasses. However, I use the 10x42s in thick bush and find the focusing helps to see through the close stuff. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia