Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
One of Us![]() |
deleted | ||
|
Moderator |
Patriot76,
Care to explain why the Swaro is supposedly more difficult to use as I can't say I have ever noticed this as a particular problem... I've used a 3-12x50mm Swaro PH since they first came out and its been faultless even in the worst of British weather! A few weeks ago, on the strength of this, I went to buy a 2.5-10x42mm PH and was dismayed to find it had been discontinued..I looked at the Z6, but wasn't keen on the reticule... Eventually, I bought a Zeiss Victory 2.5-10x42mm with a heavy No 4 reticule and the new extra hard rainguard type lens coating. Cosmetically, I think the Swaro's look a touch nicer, but optically the Zeiss is superb...The Zeiss also has a touch more eye relief than the Swaro PH although not as much as the Z6.. Regards, Pete | |||
|
One of Us![]() |
edited | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia