Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
This ought to add a little fuel to the lever gun on safari debate. Dave Clay of DRC Custom Guns is building 86 Winchesters chambered in 450/110. This is basically a 50/110 case necked down to 458. Case length is 2.4 inches and COAL is 2.88 inches. Tim Sundles of Buffalo Bore Ammo is doing load development and reports 2425 with a 400 grain bullet from a 21 inch barrel. Should get 2000 fps with 500 grain bullets. 50/110 Brass is readily avaliable from Starline and case forming is easy according to Dave. When Dave showed me a loaded cartridge I just had to have one. I will report results when it is finished. Jeff Collins | ||
|
one of us |
I mentioned this on that thread, they skipped over it. Simply because it comes in a levergun, they won't acknowledge that it has more then enough potential. Its like the "ultra magnum" of leverguns, I suppose, and will hold it's own in any situation. I look forward to the day it becomes a factory cartridge, what with Mr Sundles doing the load developement. ~~~Suluuq | |||
|
One of Us |
I would reckon that cartridge would be super. I still wish Marlin would do a .50 Alaskan. | |||
|
one of us |
Suluuq, Many lever gun bashers also don't realize that John Brownings 86 Winchester is a true contol round feed design. There is a finger that pulls the rim of the cartridge out of the magazine tube and guides it into the lips of the carrier which are formed of spring steel. The carrier then flips up as the lever is fully opened and the bolt then pushes the cartridge out of the carrier. The cartridge does not disengage the carrier until it is in the mouth of the chamber. No chance of a short stroke causing a jam. A short stroke causes the bolt to close on an empty chamber. If that happens simply work the lever fully the next time and the gun will go bang like its supposed to. Jeff | |||
|
One of Us |
Sounds like an absolute crap caliber to me. 1. Cast bullets are not tough enough for elephant, buffalo, hippo and rhino. 2. 400 grain .458 bullets do not have adequate sectional density for deep penetration. If you were telling me about a lever gun that pushes 500 grains at 2200 fps, I would be impressed. But I am not impressed with what is just a tad more than a 45-70. | |||
|
Moderator |
Guys, When the round and gun become available, you should take it to Africa and hunt buffalo, hippo, rhino, and elephant with it. After a few hundred of each have been taken successfully, with no significant system failures, we can talk about it being a DGR combo. But marketing hype and unsubstantiated claims are not enough for this crowd. There may be great leaps and strides being taken in this area, but it still remains for a large body of evidence to be created. I'm sure that the blackpowder crowd scoffed at the new, "small-bore" smokeless nitro express guns and rounds when they first came out. In relatively short order however, the nitro-express rounds proved themselves in the game fields. I'm sure the double-gun crowd didn't accept the reliability and power of a properly-built bolt-action on DG either at first. However, no one could deny the effectiveness or applicability of the bolt-action today. If and when the lever-action has "gone and done" enough on DG, then it too may be added to the list of proper DGRs. But not before then. George | |||
|
One of Us |
For me, there would be a couple of problems with a lever action. However, my opinions are based on shooting roos from the vehichle chasing the roos. Some of this might apply to Africa, or perhaps none will apply. Firstly, they will jam and when they do it is a big deal as compared to the bolt action. All actions jam up. Mini 14s will break extractors, but the bolt actions with a problem are not to big a deal. Secondly, it is almost impossible to load the magazine while in the back of the vehichle chasing the roos. Thirdly, you can never tell what is left in the magazine. I first learned about M94s when I was about 20. Took away a M70 375, M17 in 308 Norma necked to 270 and Model 94 in 30/30. The Model 94 was put to one side very early. I don't think other lever actions would have overcome the Model 94s shortfalls. Levers look great and feel great but I will tell you now they are not worth shit when chasing roos and I have seen that several times. Overall, the bolt action is best. Mike [ 06-17-2002, 18:43: Message edited by: Mike375 ] | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Sorry, jnc91, but this is not a discription of a short stroke jam! A short stroke jam is caused by not going all the way home with a push feed action, which the 86 Win is! The round that is being pushed into the chamber is left in the action if the lever, or bolt is withdrawn before the the round is fully chambered, and when the lever/bolt is worked again you have two rounds in the action. This jam, if not too bad, can be cleared in a pushfeed bolt gun with the fingers. Most times this type jam is only cleared with the aid of tools in a lever gun! The lever rifle is not the problem as much as the 45-70, and 444 M cartridges, they are simply too low on powder capacity to handle 500 gr bullets, as Garrette suggests! These two cartridges are not adiquate for Cape Buffalo no matter what kind of rifle they are shot from! The WILDCAT 450/110 is an great improvement over the 45-70, and certainly out does the 444 Marlin. This cartridge is basicly a 458 RCBS, as far as powder capacity goes, but I happen to have a 458RCBS double rifle, and I don't think the cartridge is enough for reliable use on Cape Buffalo. The case on the 458RCBS is 2.75" in length,(almost the same length as the 375 H&H, with more powder capacity) it has a water capacity of 100.13 grs of water, while the 375 H&H has 96.37 grs, the 458 Win Mag has only 93.29, and the 45-70 has only 75.51 grs.The absolute best I can get out of the 458RCBS, with a 400 gr bullet is 2150 fps from a 24" barrel. Admittedly, I don't know the capacity of the wildcat 450/110, but I would guess it is someplace close to the 458 RCBS, considering the 458 RCBS has a longer case. The draw back with both these cartridges is the very weak brass they use to start with. All the brass for this type cartridges are made for black powder, and is thin, and soft. The necked up wildcats made on the 348 Win brass are far better, because the brass is high pressure brass. Thr 450-348 Alaskan is a decent cartridge, but still falls just short of the 458 Win Mag, which is considered questionable on Buffalo in thick bush, where shots tent to be a "end of the nose" close ! The above is an example that I tried to make in the other string. Both these wildcats, and the 50 Alaskan are all the result of the 45-70 comming up short on the very soft skinned game of Alaska. This fact alone should tell you the 45-70 is not suited for thick skinned game. These wildcats are a great improvement over the 45-70, and the 444, is only good for makeing large pistol wildcat cartridges. I have a Contender chambered for 411 JDJ, and it too is too light for Buffalo. Wolud be great for big bears, however! Given the choice I would certainly take the 450-348 Alaskan over the 45-70 on Cape Buffalo, and the 444 in any guise would not even be considered, unless that's all I had, and there were no trees to climb! I don't think I'll ever have to make that choice, however, since I will not be in a camp where a 450-348 or 45-70 is depended on for Cape Buffalo. [ 06-17-2002, 19:09: Message edited by: MacD37 ] | |||
|
one of us |
500grains, Please don't hold back; tell us what you really think. | |||
|
one of us |
MacD37, You obviously have not carefully studied the functioning of the 86 Win action. It is very different than the model 94 or Marlin 95 action and it is certainly a lot different than a push feed bolt gun like the Rem 700. Short stoke jams are a problem on marlin lever actions which feed the cartridge from the mag tube under spring pressure into the carrier where they sit loose and are lifted up and pushed by the bolt into the chamber. The following is a quote from a post on the Beartooth bullets site on that subject. "Last weekend, I got my first jams by gently easing the lever to drop fired cases into my hand rather than letting them eject normally. The following cartridge then wedges in front of the carrier with the case rim hung up at the mouth of the magazine tube. Real pain in the neck to clear. Nerve racking too because tapping the jammed cartridge free means tapping awfully close to the live primer. Whew! Moral... never, ever short cycle your levergun!" The 86 Winchester is and I repeat a TRUE CONTROLLED ROUND FEED. The cartridge is pulled our of the mag tube by a finger kinda like an extractor that is attached to the lever. The finger/guide pulls the cartridge into the carrier which has a pair of spring steel wings which hold the cartridge securely as it is lifted upward. If the lever is short stroked the finger which guides the cartridge out of the mag tube will push the cartridge back into the mag tube. Hence no chance for two cartridges to get stuck in the action. The 86 action will cycle at any angle even upside down. A short stroke does not cause two rounds to get stuck in the action but instead a short stroke results in the carrier not raising up and the worst thing you get is an empty chamber and a click when you pull the trigger. The problem is rectified by simply working the lever completely the next time and pulling the trigger. I believe the chances of a short stroke under field conditions when hunting is very small to non existant. When excited people tend to work the lever vigorously which eliminates a short stroke. Most short strokes occur at the bench where the shooter is deliberately cycling the action. As to brass the new 50/110 brass is made by Starline and is based on their 50 Alaskan case and specifcally designed for modern pressure smokeless power loads. Tim Sundles of Buffalo Bore Ammo is doing load development and has reported 2400 fps with 430 grain cast bullets and 2425 fps with 400 grain Kodiac softs in his personal gun which has I believe a 21 inch barrel. That is I believe the same velocities given for 400 grain loads in the 458 Win Mag. There is no reason to believe that the 450/110 wouldn't match the 458 with heavier bullets as well. If hit with a 500 grain bullet at 2100 FPS a buff won't care whether it came from a lever or a bolt gun he'll be just as dead either way. Jeff Collins [ 06-17-2002, 20:53: Message edited by: jnc91 ] | |||
|
one of us |
500 Grains, When you can come up with a factual response other than name calling, unsupported statements and misrepresentations of what I have posted I might bother responding to your crap. Jeff | |||
|
one of us |
jnc91. What about necking it down to a 400. Either .408, .411., or .416 diameter. Lets see.... 400grains at 2125 to 2150 fps. Sounds like one of the great 450/400's to me. I have never seen a Marlin "jam". I have seen a lot of magnum bolt guns fail to feed, eject etc., which is why I use only doubles for dangerous game. | |||
|
one of us |
N E 450 No2, I personally have never seen a marlin jam either. I do not own one and can only report what has been observed by others which is that it is possible to jam one by short stroking. I personally feel that the Marlin is very reliable. As to the 450/110 Wildcat the 86 Win is the only lever gun long enough to handle the cartridge. As to necking down to 40 cal I think that it certainly would be possible. I will say that the 450/110 is probably at its peak efficiency with 400 grain bullets due to the fact that when seated to the crimp groove the base of the bullet is about even with the neck of the case. Longer bullets such as 460 grains or 500 grains will extend down into the case and compress the powder slightly. I don't know how much if any this will affect velocity if any with the 500 grainers but this cartridge may turn out to be best with a 460 or 480 grain bullet for DG instead of 500 grainers kinda like the 450 Nitro which you are obviously fond of. Jeff | |||
|
one of us |
I have quite a bit of experence with two marlin 45/70 rifles. I sold mind to my nephew after I started using doubles, He needed a good pig gun. The lever gun is one of the easiest repeating sporting rifles to reload, and except for the Krag the only one I know of that can be recharged with the bolt closed on a live round...HUMMM what about a Krag in 404 jeffery???? A little cutting here a little welding there.... | |||
|
one of us |
OOOPS. Forgot about the big Weatherbys, 378, 416, and 460. You can turn the gun upside down, open the floor plate and drop in fresh rounds, the mag only holds two, close the floorplate, turn the gun right side up and you are ready to go. Try that with a Mauser. | |||
|
one of us |
When Saeed gets home lets see if he would consider setting up a lever action forum. Then the leveraction loonies would have a place to discuss how they know more than the folks who have been there and done it. These "Let's take a Lever gun to Africa" threads are a waste of space on the best African Hunting Forum on the net. | |||
|
one of us |
No JMac, What is a waste of time on this forum is name calling. I made a post of info for discussion. I have answered my critics with fact and reason. If all you can do is call me a looney than I guess you have nothing of substance to say and maybe you should keep your mouth shut. Jeff Collins | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Jeff I think the problem here is we are calling two different things "SHORT STROKEING" and "CONTROL FEED"! Try this with the 86! Try working the lever in the normal manner untill the lever is almost completely to battery! (closed completely on a round, BUT don't close it completely, now push the leverback down,this is what is meant by short strokeing. Does the above stroke eject the round that was headed into the chamber? NO it leaves the round half chambered,the cartridge will not come with it, and at the bottom of the lever stroke, a new round is pulled out of the magazine, into the loading elevator! NOW you have two rounds in the action, and a real jam that will not be cleared without two things, TOOLS , and TIME , neither of which you will have when a Brownie, or Buffalo is closeing on you fast! A true control feed has control of the round, with the rim of the cartridge behind the extractor as soon as the bolt touches it,the rim is guided behind the extractor,long before it is chambered, not when the extractor is snapped over the rim at battery. from the time the cartridge touches the bolt, till it is ejected, no matter if it is short stroked or not!Your 86 doesn't have the extractor clamped onto the rim of the cartridge till the lever is raised all the way up, and the extractor snapped over the rim of the cartridge. An action that does not have the exractor clamped onto the cartridge untill it is completely closed, is not a control feed action. No Winchester lever action is a control feed rifle. The 86, (Mod 71 is exactly the same action as the 86) and is the strongest of the lever actions, and along with the 1895 Winchester are the only ones long enough for the old 405 Win. But they are not control feed actions! What you are calling control feed is a guided elevator, not control feed. On a control feed action,will, at any point durring the working of the action, if the sequince is reversed, the round on the bolt will be ejected! Still I have nothing bad to say about most leveraction rifles, only the cartridges they are chambered for, to be used for Cape Buffalo, Ele, and Hippo. As far as push feed actions go the leveractions are the most reliable. Your new/old round may be great, and if it is, it only makes my point, it far surpasses the old 45-70 in new cloths. If the round can be made to duplicate the 450/400NE 3",with a 400 gr bullet, or the 450 NE 3.25" with a 480 gr bullet with soft ,and solid, then you have something. Still I would rather have it in a double rifle for dangerous game, that a lever gun, but that is a personal choice. You guys would laugh if you looked into my gun collection. There are a number of fine 45-70 rifles, and Almost every thing Winchester ever made, with a lever, is there, as well! There are number of rifles there, also, that have been rechambered to more powerful rounds from 45-70s! Folks, I don't have one thing against the old 45-70, as long as it is used for what it is, not what it could be if it were more powerful! | |||
|
one of us |
I wonder why my PH says my .375 H&H with 270 grain Swift A-Frames at 2700 fps would be a good choice for a Cape Buffalo hunt? | |||
|
one of us |
jnc91, I for one enjoy hearing about possible new cartridges designed for dangerous game (and non-dangerous game too.) It's an amazing thing about the negative responses. Why some folks insist on "pissing on other folks Wheaties" is beyond me. Nobody is forcing them to agree, accept, or even acknowledge the fact that these cartridges and rifles can in fact work in a dangerous game situation. As always, honest and fair criticism are to be expected, but when somebody comes out and calls a cartridge "crap", they must know that they are insulting the original poster. From what I've seen here in the past, Saeed is very open to all forms of discussion. Censoring, or limiting, of true hunting/shooting related topics is not his style. We all place certain limits on ourselves while hunting. Perhaps anyone not shooting absolutely the largest cartridge they can accurately handle could be accused of pulling a "stunt"? It would be a sorry day when we accuse a hunter using a 404 Jeffery on Cape Buffalo, to be a fool, simply because the 458 Lott is available. (The above is an example, don't get caught up in the cartridges mentioned.) I've been with this website for many years, back when the format was much different (pre-infopop days.) It would be very pretentious, to assume that only our interests, are the interests of the other 4500 members here at AccurateReloading. [ 06-18-2002, 00:31: Message edited by: BW ] | |||
|
one of us |
MacD37, You are correct if you define control round feed in that manner the 86 Win extracter does not catch the rim until the lever is completely closed. My 86 is at the gunsmith being converted so I cannot try what you suggest however I am not sure that I agree with your description of how the action works. Starting from a closed lever and an empty chamber the lever opens. The cartridge is physically pulled from the action by a claw attached to the lever into the wings of the carrier. When the lever hits the end of its foward throw the carrier swings up and as the bolt closes the round is pushed into the chamber. The carrier remains up until the bolt is completely and then and only then does it swing back down to its original position. The second round does not leave the mag tube until the lever physically pulls it from the tube and pulls it into the wings of the carrier as it is opened. If the lever is closed before the stroke is completed the cartridge is guided back into the mag tube. Like I said I don't have my rifle in front of me to play with as I write this but that is how I understand from memory the action to work. I just don't see how two rounds could get stuck in the action but I could be wrong. Jeff Collins | |||
|
one of us |
Sorry for double post. Jeff [ 06-17-2002, 23:52: Message edited by: jnc91 ] | |||
|
one of us |
Three separate kills. | |||
|
Moderator |
Jackfish, You omitted the fact that those were taken with a .45-70, not the .45-110. The hunter runs "The Firing Line" website, and took these buff in Tanzania. I read the posts; buff #1 took 1 shot; buff #2 took 4 shots; buff #3 took 7 shots. Buff hunting can get exciting. George | |||
|
one of us |
GeorgeS, I am not concerned with the 45-110 but am trying to make the point, which I tried to make in the other thread, that the 45-70 in a lever gun has been successfully used to take Cape Buffalo. Does that make a 45-70 lever gun a DGR? Maybe not. I don't think many of us will be worried about Elephant and Hippo, as a Cape Buffalo hunt is probably the hunt of a lifetime. Indeed, there are few of us who will actually hunt, or really care to hunt for that matter, Elephant and Hippo. The 45-70 lever gun is certainly capable of taking Cape Buffalo. Pooh Pooh all you want but there are the facts. | |||
|
one of us |
If I remember correctly there is a PH who uses a 45/70 Marlin Co Pilot as a lion backup rifle. As to lever action TR took a Winchester M95 lever to Africa, but then the past is another country. DVC Doyle | |||
|
Moderator |
Jackfish, Please take a few minutes to read my posts on both threads. I can wait. Now, a few questions for you: Did I say the .45-70/.450Marlin/.45-110 could not do the job on buff on occasion and under ideal conditions, or did I say it was not a DGR? Did I tell anyone NOT to use it, or did I encourage them to take it to Africa for buff? Did I say no one EVER used a .45-70 lever-action on DG, or did I say it wasn't the best choice, especially on thick-skinned game? Did a lever-action fan ask US for our opinion, or did we go to a lever-action site and "piss on their corn flakes"? BTW, Rich is not a member of the MT forums, so my statement is still true; nobody there has done any DG hunting with a lever-action despite all the big talk. If someone can convince him to sign up, then there will at least be one guy who can speak from experience. Rich wanted to try taking buff with his .45-70 and he did so, putting his money where his mouth was. I congratulate him for having the guts to do it. Now the rest of you need to get after it and stop fantasizing. After a few hundred such results, we can re-examine the issue. George | |||
|
One of Us |
jnc91, Judging by the number of your posts, it seems you are heavily vested in the outcome of this debate. Generally for deep penetration a sectional density of .300 or above with a muzzle velocity of 2150 or above is considered minimum. Your 400 grain .458 bullet fails in the sectional density department. Move up to 450 or 500 grains, and I think that your proposed new caliber will fail in the velocity department. Add to that the fact that most new cartridges are hyped in the velocity department at introduction, and we will probably see actual velocities 200 fps lower than what you have stated. In other words, it is not a dangerous game cartridge. I have not used a model 1886, but the other levers I own and use jam like a house afire when things go wrong. And things go wrong dangerous game hunting. Count on it. | |||
|
<Henry McCann> |
BW, I appreciated your remarks. | ||
one of us |
But what if it were loaded with Match Kings? Then would it be ok for Buff? | |||
|
one of us |
500Grains, I am not heavily vested in the out come of this post. I am very excited about the new rifle that I am having built and frankly I was a little miffed at the dismissive tone of some of the posts. They seem to regurgitate old platitudes with out having read and thought about the information I put out. I have made a number of posts today because I am off of work today and the computer is always on when I see a new post I answer it. As to the velocity figures. The velocity figures Tim Sundles reported are consistant with estimates from my load from a disc software. The first loads developed just a few weeks ago are equal to a 458 mag with 400 grain bullets and there is no reason to believe that won't hold true for 500 grain bullets as well. | |||
|
one of us |
Next year, I'd love to book a hunt with JJHack. Just to drive him crazy, perhaps I'll bring my Browning A-Bolt and my Marlin 444SS. The poor old 375H&H M70 Super Express will just have to stay home... | |||
|
One of Us |
I think ToddE is right. The 45-70 is a very "capable" round on most anything in North America or Africa. I have taken a North American Bison with one and I even used factory ammunition. Penetration was fine with the Remington Core-Lokt ammunition but shot options were certainly more restricted than if I had been using something more "modern" like a 400 grain Barnes solid doin' 2400 fps. However, I also took a second Bison with my .416 Rem Mag last year expecting exit wounds with my 400 grain X-bullets on broadside shots and didn't get 'em so I guess you never know what might happen right? I think it is also very important to remember that cape buffalo have a differing rib anatomy that might make penetration a bit tougher on these critters relative to NA Bison. Obviously, a 45-70 or 45-110 will work on both of these animals(as shown by the photos above) but it might not be the most responsible thing to do as a hunter. Just cuz' something can be done with a "capable" round or weapon doesn't make it the best option. I think if someone really wants to use primitive weaponry on these big boys, he/she should just use a bow eh! JMHO, JohnTheGreek | |||
|
one of us |
HI, Now here is a subject I know a little about. I am getting a win86 in 50-110 from Mr. Clay. In fact sent him my scope and a check a few weeks ago, I should see my gun next month some time. I like the 50-110 as it throws that big .510 525 grain bullet and will throw it 200 fps more than a 50 Alaskan. I know had a 50 AK, I will get around 2,200 fps with the 525 grain and talk to GSCuston bullet and they told me I should not have a problem with there 500 grain FN Jeffery bullet. I order some of them. I think I will get them between 2,200 -2,250 fps and they will penetrate like no tomorrow.I just order some 50-110 brass,250 rounds, from starline. They informed me they are out of stock right now, but will have some in two weeks.I will get them when they come in.By the way there is reloading done with the 50-110 with a 525 grain out of a 20 inch barrel that got around 2,145 fps without a problem and was informed could have got more easly, we will see. Kev | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Jeff, you are still not understanding what I'm trying to convey to you. That is my fault, I have great difficulty explaining these things in print! And please don't get angry, this is simply somthing that is so misunderstood by so many people. I've heard everything from a CRF action being one with a claw extractor, to God only Knows what else, it seems a lot of people do not understand what constitutes CRF. I think what I'm not getting accross is what is ment by short strokeing! It is easier to explain with a bolt rifle, but the same prencibles apply to the lever gun as well. I will segment your post into numbered parts, for ease of explanation. #1 We are together so far, except that the extractor is not engaged with the rim of the cartridge at this point, if the lever is not closed fully! If it isn't beore it is lowered again, this is the short stroke! #2 The carrier is up till the lever starts back down, at this point the short stroke has already happened, as the lever was not snapped all the way home on the round in the chamber, before the shooter starts back down with the lever, (short stroke) the round in the chamber is not withdrawn, and remains in the chamber. #3 At this point, at about the last third of the down stroke of the lever, the palls pull the next round into the carrier, or Elevator, but don't forget, you already have a round almost home in the chamber, that because there is no control feed, the extractor never took control of the round in the chamber. Now it tries to bring the next round up in the elevator, as the lever is closed again. Result,: Two rounds in the action, one almost seated in the chamber, and another one comming up in the carrier/elevator. #4 Here, you are thinking the short strokeing is on the wrong end of the stroke, the short stroke is not going all the way home with the first round! If the bolt doesn't pull the chambered round out, the palls do not know that, and at the bottom of the next stroke they pull the next round out of the Magazine, and into the elevator. result: "DAMN JAM"! | |||
|
<allen day> |
Two points: #1 I have no intention of taking a lever gun on safari. #2 We have no need for any new cartridges - of the dangerous game variety or otherwise. AD | ||
one of us |
MacD37, I don't have my 86 in front of me to play so I will have to concede to you that it may be possible to induce a jam with the 86 if one is trying to. I'll have to get out one of my Mausers and see if it is possible to get one of them to jam as well (I have two custom sporters which I am very fond of so I am not just some lever freak). I have not been the least annoyed with your posts. You have simply answered my posts with reason and logic (wish I could say the same for all the posters here). I find the interaction here to be very educational. While I agree that nothing equals the great 98 Mauser for dependibility I am convinced that my 86 is more than reliable enough to stake my life on. I also believe that the 45/70 is minimally adequate for buff and that it fits in the same catagory as 375 or 9.3 but the 45/70 is no where near as effective as the 458 or 416. Finally I believe that 45/110 is a major improvement over the 45/70 and that the cartridge legitimatiy has the potential to equal the balistics of the 450 Nitro/458 Mag in a lever gun. Each cartridge/rifle choice is combination of strengths, weaknesses and compromises. It is the responsibility hunter to understand what each of these are and to stay within those limits. ToddE, You are right recoil is a concern with a lever action cannon. I am having a full length mag tube installed that should bring the weight of my 7.5 pound extra lite up to about 8.0 pounds. Throw in six rounds of ammo and we have about 8.5 pounds. It will have a Decelerator recoil pad and a removable muzzle brake for the shooting bench. As we all know you don't notice the recoil in the field when the action is heating up. Finally sighting will be accomplished with Ashley Ghost Rings. Jeff Collins | |||
|
One of Us |
Jack fish were did you get your stock?? I would like one for my 45/70. Nice Buff & Very Very Very nice rifle | |||
|
one of us |
One thing for sure, is a few folks give some sort of "power level" a cartridge must surpass to be accepted, yet some PH's in the past, as well as recently (including at least one very respected hunter here that I remember) have shot DG with lesser rounds. They try to justify it by saying, "Its all we had at the time". "Do as I say, not as I do". Yes! They do indeed have a choice - wait for a more suitable cartridge to be used, as in "Go get one for crying out loud!" Why advocate a certain minumum, then break it because "Its all we had"? Using this mentality, why even advocate some "level power" that the cartridges must surpass, if they are just going to reject it when they please, then make some sorry excuse as a means to justify it, all the while blast others for bringing up other cartridges that far surpass them Deer rifles they were using? ~~~Suluuq | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia