THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Cabelas Boycotting HARRISBURG SHOW
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
http://www.easternsportshow.com/


Reed Exhibitions has decided to postpone, for now, the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show given the controversy surrounding its decision to limit the sale or display of modern sporting rifles (also called ARs) at the event. The show was scheduled to take place February 2-10 in Harrisburg, PA.

“Our original decision not to include certain products in the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show this year was made in order to preserve the event’s historical focus on the hunting and fishing traditions enjoyed by American families,” said Chet Burchett, Reed Exhibitions President for the Americas. “In the current climate, we felt that the presence of MSRs would distract from the theme of hunting and fishing, disrupting the broader experience of our guests. This was intended simply as a product decision, of the type event organizers need to make every day.

“It has become very clear to us after speaking with our customers that the event could not be held because the atmosphere of this year’s show would not be conducive to an event that is designed to provide family enjoyment. It is unfortunate that in the current emotionally charged atmosphere this celebratory event has become overshadowed by a decision that directly affected a small percentage of more than 1,000 exhibits showcasing products and services for those interested in hunting and fishing.

“ESS has long been proud to participate in the preservation and promotion of hunting and fishing traditions, and we hope that as the national debate clarifies, we will have an opportunity to consider rescheduling the event when the time is right to focus on the themes it celebrates.”
 
Posts: 257 | Registered: 17 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It sounds to me like a political statement trying to turn the blame on those of us that voiced disgust for their attack on the second amendment. Instead of taking the blame themselves. I wonder if they will be refunding everyone their fees or if every vendor will have to sue to get them back.

quote:
“It has become very clear to us after speaking with our customers that the event could not be held because the atmosphere of this year’s show would not be conducive to an event that is designed to provide family enjoyment. It is unfortunate that in the current emotionally charged atmosphere this celebratory event has become overshadowed by a decision that directly affected a small percentage of more than 1,000 exhibits showcasing products and services for those interested in hunting and fishing.


It effects 80 million gun owners in this country and so far over a 1/4 of the vendors scheduled to attend the show have taken that stance in the last week alone!!!! I believe this is far from over!!
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Corvallis,montana | Registered: 10 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Typical liberal left - blame others for their F*CK up. A win for the good guys.
 
Posts: 5338 | Location: Bedford, Pa. USA | Registered: 23 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scriptus
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jim Manion:
Here is a list of vendors who have dropepd out:

http://mynortheastoutdoors.com...-boycott-supporters/

That list is updated daily.

To address Saeed's question as to "why" in a little more detail, there is a huge push in the US now for gun control. And, finally, there is a huge push back against it.

Gun control proponents were quick to take the murders at Sandy Hook as their opportunity to use public opinion in the US to disarm the American public. Not all at once, but in a death of a thousand cuts.

These same progressives (the new communism), would never even think of banning cars to prevent drunk driving here in the US. You can't blame the tool there. And they conveniently ignore the link between most if not all shooters in these mass shooting events and psychiatric/psychotropic drugs, which are rampantly prescribed here in the US for young adults. Despite the fact that the FDA testing on these drugs did not include the under 25 age group, and despite the fact that all of these drugs contain the FDA"s most serious "black box" warning.

After all, big pharmaceutical companies spend tens of millions of dollars each year lobbying Congress, and spend tens of millions of dollars every year in the form of campaign contributions. A little known fact herein the US is that when a member of Congress retires or is voted out of office, what is left in their campaign funds becomes their personal money.

So before the young bodies were cold at Sandy Hook, progressives launched into their attacks on our Second Amendment. Hell, we even have a Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Ginsberg, who claims our Second Amendment is an anacronism and that our Constitution needs to be "modernized" - and she uses South Africa's Constitution as the shining model for the new era.

THIS SHOULD CONVINCE YOU ALL

SEEN IN THE PARKING LOT AT MANGAUNG ANC CONFERENCE : 106 BMW X5's, 28 RANGE ROVER SPORTS, 211 BMW 5 or 7 series sedans, 11 MASERATI's, 103 MERCEDES BENZ sedans, 6 HUMMERS, 9 FERRARI's. Apart from the fact that the tax payer is paying to get all these cars to the conference, paying for the luxury accommodation, decadently luxurious and excessive food and drinks (all free!!), wives, spouses, lovers, friends and family - all catered for - all at tax payers’ expense. And we wonder why the govt says they dont have money for RDP housing, proper education system, proper healthcare facilities, proper police force and crime control - and all the other things they promised and haven't honoured !!!!

Those of us who support our Second Amendment abided by a self imposed mourning period after the trajedy, but the progressives did not. Less than 24 hours after the trajedy, drafts of bills pushing serious gun control measures were published.

The battle lines have been pretty mush drawn, and sides have started to solidify.

One tactic used in the past (as with the Assault Weapons bans in 1994) was to split hunters out of the Pro Second Amendment pack. You will hear statements like you don't need 30 shots to go deer hunting, even though the Second Amendment had nothing to do with hunting.

In the past, it worked well enough to split the hunting community up - some hunters openly villified "black rifles" and high capacity magazines.

So what the Show's organizer was trying to do was to capitalize on that past split. The organizer, Reed, by the way, is a British company. And are now bloody shocked to see the colonialists once again in a rather nasty stir.

Hunters know full well where further gun control will go. As Martin Niemöller stated long ago:

quote:
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.


This push for gun control is not really about guns; it is about control. The Second Amendment is the last significant roadblock to a total gutting of out Bill of Rights. And our liberal brethern do not seem to understand that as the Second amendment goes, so goes our Bill of Rights. Any limitation or restriction on any one right can be equally imposed and applied on all other rights.

The "progressive" movement wants to move to a communist model. (You know its bad when Pravda starts mocking the current administration as communism on steriods). But to achieve their socialist nirvana, they need to first disarm their citizens.
 
Posts: 3297 | Location: South of the Equator. | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pauly3511:
http://www.easternsportshow.com/


“Our original decision not to include certain products in the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show this year was made in order to preserve the event’s historical focus on the hunting and fishing traditions enjoyed by American families,” said Chet Burchett, Reed Exhibitions President for the Americas. “In the current climate, we felt that the presence of MSRs would distract from the theme of hunting and fishing, disrupting the broader experience of our guests. This was intended simply as a product decision, of the type event organizers need to make every day.

“It has become very clear to us after speaking with our customers that the event could not be held because the atmosphere of this year’s show would not be conducive to an event that is designed to provide family enjoyment. It is unfortunate that in the current emotionally charged atmosphere this celebratory event has become overshadowed by a decision that directly affected a small percentage of more than 1,000 exhibits showcasing products and services for those interested in hunting and fishing.

“ESS has long been proud to participate in the preservation and promotion of hunting and fishing traditions, and we hope that as the national debate clarifies, we will have an opportunity to consider rescheduling the event when the time is right to focus on the themes it celebrates.”


Weasel words.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13757 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
looks like the boycott worked! they cancelled the entire show?
 
Posts: 259 | Location: Marietta, Georgia | Registered: 04 July 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill C
posted Hide Post
Indeed Mike. Hopefully at least the venders will get their money back.
 
Posts: 3153 | Location: PA | Registered: 02 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
So at first we are told it only affects about 5 vendors. Now it is 1000? We still have been given no details about what the "one vendor" causing a problem was. Sounds more and more like total fabrication. These folks have not figured out when to quit digging! Now some weasel wording is trying to make all of us the bad guys? Did I really read that? They can cancel it from now on as far as I am concerned. Then again, maybe its what someone wants? Someone with a lout of clout has to be pushing them behind the scenes. The couldn't be this stupid about human nature could they? They had better refund every dime of money that is asked for with no grief for any of the vendors. It will be interesting to see how this plays out for next year as well as the SHOTSHOW. I think the best think Reed could do right now is just admit publicly the made a poor decision for this year and move on. I don't think that has much chance of happening though. These types never admit when they are wrong.


Happiness is a warm gun
 
Posts: 4106 | Location: USA | Registered: 06 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Use Enough Gun
posted Hide Post
Why would this affect the Shot Show next year?
 
Posts: 18581 | Registered: 04 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm glad to see that voices of sanity when combined can still have an impact on organizations. In reality I think this situation is really just the tip of the iceberg as it relates to the whole "gun control" proposals as have come from Obama and the liberal ilk....stay tuned, there will be more of these situations going forward IMO

BUT I think there is one thing that we all need to be aware of and if possible rally ourselves to try to have a "secondary positive impact" that is beneficial to the vendors of the show. A lot of the smaller vendors relied on this show as a major source of their business income. Despite how they may feel about the ban it WILL negatively impact them financially. That impact will come in the form of lost deposits, cancelled airline and hotel reservations, necessary changes to their business schedules and certainly the loss of product and services sales plus potentially legal fees if they try to reclaim any lost income. All of this will be detrimental in the long run to many of the smaller business who were to exhibit....

SO my thinking is that we collectively can have another impact by consciously making an effort to patronize the vendors from the show, first by thanking them for their decision and secondly and more importantly spending a little of our money with them on their Web sites, email, mail, word of mouth etc. Some of this effort won't be practical of course but I think would could help in some small way as a collective purchasing group.

Perhaps we start a separate thread (with permission from Saeed of course) to list the vendors or find creative ways to patronize them.
What do you all think?

Paul


"Diligentia - Vis - Celeritas"
NRA Benefactor Member
Member DRSS
 
Posts: 1026 | Location: Southeastern PA, USA | Registered: 14 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Use Enough Gun:
Why would this affect the Shot Show next year?


NSSF (National Shooting Sports Foundation) Statement on the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show
National Shooting Sports Foundation ^ | January 24, 2013
Posted on 1/24/2013 10:06:59 AM by Second Amendment First

We have just learned that Reed Exhibitions has decided to postpone the 2013 Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show.

In the days following Reed Exhibitions’ announcement that modern sporting rifles would be prohibited from the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show, the leadership of the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) has been in intense, frank discussions with Reed Exhibitions management in an effort to reverse this unacceptable decision. These discussions reached an impasse.

NSSF is in no way affiliated with, nor does it participate in or exhibit at this show in any way. Reed Exhibitions does, however, manage the NSSF-owned SHOT Show (though Reed manages the SHOT Show, all SHOT Show decisions, policies and actions are made at NSSF’s direction).

Because of Reed’s recent actions, NSSF is considering all options regarding the management of future SHOT Shows.


____________________________________________

"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchett.
 
Posts: 3530 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: 25 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Clem
posted Hide Post
To hell with them. Come to Michigan. We have a better show and "black guns" are welcome.


http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news...t_county/huntin-expo
 
Posts: 1292 | Location: I'm right here! | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
with the money people have spent on airplane tickets, hotel resv. etc. with no intent if remuneration seems to me that reed would be open to a pretty good lawsuit
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Highlander7
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Use Enough Gun:
Why would this affect the Shot Show next year?


Reed Exhibitions produces the SHOT SHOW. Why wasn't it a issue for ARs/MSR during that show

I'm not saying there is a double standard because of what is represented at the SHOT SHOW but, why wasn't it a issue there? If you feel they (AR/MSR) don't belong why not start at the very top where they are being produced? Not at a Sportsman show. Honestly it never even crossed my mind about AR/MSR being at the show this year. That wasn't the reason I was going to attend and I'm also guessing the main reason why the majority of the people. Trust me when I tell you there is nearly a gun show very weekend in the state of Pennsylvania. I live very near the "Oaks plaza" where they hold numerous gun shows throughout the year. There was a show right after Sandy Hook and the attendence was three times what it normally was. Anyway... It never honestly occured to me to go to the Eastern Outdoor Show and look for a "Black Rifle". I was going to visit with vendors I made friends with and to book a surprise hunt for my wife's 40th birthday. Once "Reed Ehibitions" made the statement there was no turning back. People feel strongly about the 2nd and I'm gald to see a lot of ventors come together and stand up to what they believe in.


MSG, USA (Ret.) Armor
NRA Life Memeber
 
Posts: 599 | Location: Chester County, PA. | Registered: 09 February 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I was pleased that my taxidermist, Wildlife Studios and their owner, Wes Good, declared that they were not participating. Makes me happy to do business with him and his company, aside from the fact that their work is outstanding.


Dutch
 
Posts: 2753 | Registered: 10 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I personally feel that Americans have too long held their tongue too silent over the total assault on our Constitution. Let them bite off a piece, it'll be ok is a terrible attitude to have. I for one am tired of Congress, period. Bunch of overpaid clowns that can't settle in and do their damn job. And the clown they have running the show......
The backlog of background checks being run in unprecedented numbers should definitely get their attention. We are not a nation of sheep and have to figure out how to unseat these most unworthy idiots before they totally destroy our country.
We've been quiet but now is not the time.
When Kalifornia Gov Schwarzendummer declared that .50 cals were no longer legal in his state, I supported Ronnie Barretts decision not to sell parts, fix guns, or sell them in that state to anyone or agency. Never wanted one until that and I bought not one but 2 just to help. Guns have been an American way of life since the beginning. If we didn't have guns, the idiots would use bow and arrows or clubs. Are they ever gonna learn that guns aren't the issue? Albeit, they do make them easier to kill, it is the loonies and criminals........ Mad
 
Posts: 4214 | Location: Southern Colorado | Registered: 09 October 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Greg Schubert:
looks like the boycott worked! they cancelled the entire show?


That is one way to look at it.

Or, it is another victory for the anti-gun forces. Obviously.
 
Posts: 1261 | Location: Clearwater, FL and Union Pier, MI | Registered: 24 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHowell:
quote:
Originally posted by Greg Schubert:
looks like the boycott worked! they cancelled the entire show?


That is one way to look at it.

Or, it is another victory for the anti-gun forces. Obviously.


Possibly could be viewed as victory for the anti-gun forces in a bit of a round about way LH, and IMO only by the spin machine of the looney left, but I think that view would be best described as a short term victory at best. The overriding theme here is that an attack on the U.S.'s right to bear arms was once again initiated, (and again by British influences) and people realized that the short term pain of avoiding the show, was less important than the long term implications of continued eroding of our rights. Taking a stand is always going to be painful but the time has arrived to show whatever backbone is required.
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by A.Dahlgren:
OFFICIAL SHOCKEY STATEMENT REGARDING ESOS:

Due to recent decisions made by Reed Exhibitions regarding the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show, Jim and Eva Shockey will not attend this year’s event. We have carefully considered the feelings of our fans, customers and business partners in making this decision. We will miss seeing all of our friends who visit us in Harrisburg each year.
Thank you for your support and understanding.

- Team Shockey


Here is a list of vendors and celebrities not going to the Harrisburg show because of the gun ban.
Please add to the list if you hear about more not attending.
Cabelas
M Waddell + entourage
Blaine Anthony
Boondock Outdoors
Trop Gun Shop
DuckWater Boats Dover Ohio
Lancaster Archery Supply
Nature Blinds, LLC
Whitetail Bosses
Domari Nolo Defense Consulting
Wired Outdoors
Atlantic Tactical
Direct Action Tactical Firearms
Cutting Edge Bullets
Dead Ringer
Kinsey's Outdoors
Open Season TV
X- Stand Treestands
HookHunt
Full Circle Outdoors
Hunters and Guides Connection
Alaska's Ravencroft Lodge
Cross Canyon Arms
Fred Eichler - Fulldraw Outfitters
Ralph & Vicki Cianciarulo - Archers Choice Media
Zook Cabins
Warmbag
Mountain Dog Chews
Dominator 365
Midwest Whitetail Adventures
Arrowhead outdoors
My Northeast Outdoors
CanCooker
Northern Hideaway Outfitters
2 Million Bullets
Firearms Industry Consulting Group
Keystone Country Store


Hope Jim will do the same in his own country about using some Semi-auto on the owning and hunting side ....
 
Posts: 1887 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Let's see if I have this right....A gun show is cancelled, and you call it a victory? It means nothing more than one less major gun show, and I'm not at all convinced that it should be construed as a victory for gun enthusiasts. It's more like a win fot the anti gun crowd.
 
Posts: 16249 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
Let's see if I have this right....A gun show is cancelled, and you call it a victory? It means nothing more than one less major gun show, and I'm not at all convinced that it should be construed as a victory for gun enthusiasts. It's more like a win fot the anti gun crowd.


It certainly is not a victory for us.

But, it certainly is the lesser evil if we had let them get away with it aftar their silly change of policy.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69285 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Absolutely!

Thanks for you guys who answered the question raised about my statement on the SHOTSHOW.

I still have to wonder if we all are not being manipulated. God, am I that paranoid about this? There are just too many things where it still does not add up.

I also received responses from the Ohio governor and my senate and house representatives today. The governor just went up a notch. Unfortunately my senator is not getting my vote next time! I of course am taking this to the point of ridiculousness to make my point. I sincerely wish that there would never be a next time. Somehow with the way tings are headed in this world though I doubt it. I suggested that they make the current NICS system available to normal civilians who register to use it. No new laws, no new legislation, and no real new costs. I of course also expressed my feelings on the entire subject. It took some doing though since y'all know how meek and un-opinionated I am.

Here is the letter I got back. So what happens
next time something bad happens? Lets say hypothetically that some idiot goes in somewhere with Molotov cocktails that can be made by anyone in 30 seconds. Are the politicians going to want to ban gasoline, glass bottles, and cotton fabric?


quote:
Thank you for expressing your concerns over gun control and access to mental health care.


When our children and families are no longer safe at our schools, in our malls, and in our movie theaters, we as a country must take action. The shocking numbers of public shootings throughout the country last year, culminating in Newtown, Connecticut, demand that we engage in a serious national discussion.



Many people have expressed concerns about holes in our mental health care system that contributes to violence. Though people with mental illness are not at an increased risk of behaving violently in general, there is a subset of individuals with mental illness who are at risk of violent behavior of the kinds we have seen in public gathering places.



Over the last few years, Congress has passed laws to improve the mental health system so individuals in need of psychiatric evaluation, treatment, and support do not fall through the cracks. Several components of these laws have yet to be fully implemented.



In a bipartisan effort to ensure that mental and behavioral health services are covered by insurance in a manner equivalent to medical and surgical services. Congress passed the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act in 2008 This law prohibits insurance companies from arbitrarily limiting the number of hospital days or outpatient treatment sessions a patient is granted, as well as prohibiting higher copayments or deductibles for subscribers who seek psychological services. Such practices by insurance companies were both wrong and counterproductive. This legislation will help the 54 million Americans with mental illness gain access to appropriate and affordable treatment. My Senate colleagues and I have been working with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to ensure this law is fully implemented. Additionally, I and several of my colleagues sent a letter to President Obama asking him and HHS to fully implement the law.



The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is also working to improve access to mental and behavioral health services. Individuals in Ohio who have been denied insurance coverage due to a pre-existing mental health condition can now access the new Ohio High-Risk Insurance pool. For more information on the high risk pool or to sign-up for coverage, please visit http://www.insurance.ohio.gov/...HighRiskPoolFAQs.pdf



The ACA immediately eliminated pre-existing coverage exclusions for children. Kids will no longer be denied coverage — or have services excluded from coverage — as a result of pre-existing conditions. Additionally, parents of young adults can now maintain coverage for their children until age 26. Serious mental illness is often first noticed in the late teens or early twenties, when the brain is changing rapidly and when pressures to perform are great. It is crucial that young adults with existing or emerging mental illnesses not experience lapses in coverage at this time of high risk.



Beginning in 2014, insurance companies can no longer deny coverage to individuals with mental illness and insurers cannot use mental illness as a reason to raise premiums. HHS also established an essential benefits package — a set of health care service categories that must be covered by most plans — that will take effect in 2014. Mental health and substance abuse disorder services will be part of this package.



The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the ACA represent tremendous strides forward for mental health coverage and access. However, we must also re-examine our mental health safety net, which has faced unrelenting budget cuts, reducing access for some our most vulnerable citizens.



Finally, we must work to reduce the stigma attached to mental health treatment, and find ways to support families who are concerned about the mental health status of their loved ones. It is essential that families know about the mental health resources available to them, and that they understand they have allies and other resources to which they can turn. Education about signs of mental illness, how to obtain a mental health screening, and how to access treatment services are simple but key ingredients to a successful national plan for managing mental health crises. Should any legislation concerning gun control and access to mental and behavioral health care come before the Senate, I will keep your thoughts in mind.



Thank you also for sharing your thoughts on background checks for firearms owners.



I continue to receive numerous constituent letters voicing opinions on this issue. Gun shows have become a way for criminals and gun traffickers to purchase weapons without a background check and without a record of purchase. Gun sellers at these shows are not always registered the same way as owners of gun shops. This enables people to sell guns to criminals or the mentally unstable without any record being created for law enforcement. The International Association of Chiefs of Police supports improving and expanding the background check process to ensure that registration and background check is conducted for every gun sale.



Gun control is a complex issue and we must work together to uphold our Constitution while at the same time ensuring that our communities are safe. We can and must act to ensure tragedies like this never happen again.



Should any legislation come before the Senate for a vote, I will keep your views in mind. Thank you again for getting in touch with me.



Sincerely,



Sherrod Brown

United States Senator


Yes we must all work together to try to prevent something like this from ever happening again. More gun control laws however is not the answer. First criminals don't give a damn about the law. Second the federal, state, and local authorities don't pursue and prosecute with prejudice those who ignore the laws now.


In the end it isn't about guns it is about control. The first step being to disarm us.

Scriptus, you have pretty much hit the nail on the head. Spot on my friend!


Happiness is a warm gun
 
Posts: 4106 | Location: USA | Registered: 06 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: