THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    Harry Selby's Thoughts on the .375 H&H Magnum
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Harry Selby's Thoughts on the .375 H&H Magnum
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Antlers
posted Hide Post
jfm, I didn't think Phil was insulting Selby at all - I think he had tongue firmly in cheek - thus the quotation marks around antiquated.


Antlers
Double Rifle Shooters Society
Heym 450/400 3"
 
Posts: 1990 | Location: AL | Registered: 13 February 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Matt Graham
I do not know what the ammo was as this was a borrowed rifle and we had just arrived in camp and got to the mtn. top where game scouts had seen this herd in quick time. The rifle had just killed one buff some 20 + mins. before I shot mine by another member of my hunting party.
Granted the one lung shot was not the best shot to have made. I was unaware the rifle had a varmint weight trigger and so was the buffalo
:-).
I feel if I had made that same shot with the 416 RM and the Barnes X 350 I shoot in it the first shot might have cause more damage. The second shot right in the brisket at VERY close range with a bullet that is larger in front and in weight I think would have had more of an attitude adjustment on the buff but then again...the 3rd shot (in the side) from a 505 Gibbs did not seem to change his mind too much. The brain shots were the real work horse of it all. It worked and I am still alive and that is all that matters to me. I just can't help but think in my own mind...bigger might have been better in this one case.
Having said that..I came home and bought a 375 H&H. It adds to my battery of toys from 300 H&H, .338 Win. Mag., 9.3x62 and the .416 Rem. Mag. I already have.
Had Delta and South African Air not screwed up so bad by shipping my gun and clothing two days later I would have taken on this bull with the 9.3 x 62 and the 286. grn. Triple Shocks I had intended to shoot everything with. Lots of buffs have been killed with that caliber too.
No matter..the score is Me: 2 buffalo and Buffalo: 0 Me
A fella can't own too many guns nor too much ammo.
Better tomorrows!


You can borrow money but you can not borrow time. Go hunting with your family.
 
Posts: 1529 | Location: Texas | Registered: 15 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
Good for you, Harry. As I said above, I do firmly agree that bigger is better when the flak is flying.

And jfm, you need to learn to savvy Alaskan. Roll Eyes


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13747 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hard to disagree with Mr. Selby. I've always carried a .375, but always as a backup and never fired one except at the range in Africa. My .416 has always met the task. Sometimes above and beyond the call. The .375 is no doubt more versatile.
 
Posts: 10470 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 26 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of eagle27
posted Hide Post
jfm quote:
"Harry Selby used a .416 Rigby as a backup rifle but here is part of an article he wrote just recently on the real all-purpose cartridge"

jfm - I think Harry's 416 was more than a backup rifle. He bought it around 1949 after his 470 double got run over and damaged beyond repair, and by all accounts used the Mauser 416 Rigby for much of the rest of his career saying in his opinion it was "the perfect professional hunters rifle". He gave up using soft nose bullets and used solids on everything "shooting many hundreds of rounds over many years".

jfm quote:
"like Selby, who is known as the greatest of the great white hunters, does a write-up like this, I listen as he has more experience than all on this forum combined"

jfm - Even Harry would not claim to be the greatest of the great white hunters although in the eyes of most of us he is certainly up there as one of the best PHs around during his career.

The greatest of the great white hunters we have ever seen and more importantly heard from through their writings have to come from the ranks of Selous, Bell, Hunter, Taylor etc.
The term "great white hunter" came about from the early PH safari guides with JA Hunter generally being credited as probably the first for whom this title was coined although he did a tremendous amount of culling work for game departments too.

The others I mentioned were white hunters who hunted and shot professionally for meat and ivory but were not PH guides as such.

Like many who have posted here, my perfect Xmas present now would be a book by Harry Selby on his life and times in Africa Frowner
 
Posts: 3926 | Location: Rolleston, Christchurch, New Zealand | Registered: 03 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by JohnDL:
Harry Selby is a dottering old geezer who can't be taken seriously!

Back when he was hunting, buffalo were not nearly as tough as they are today. Today, anything less than 50 caliber is just plain foolish.

Selby probably never tested bullets in media and therefore has no credibility. Geez, he probably doesn't even know what a noncom is.

Over 50 years, under a wide variety of conditions, with hundreds of clients means absolutely nothing![/QUOTE


I read Harry's article with interest and have a few comments to make regarding the 375.

I think a little to much is made of calibre rather than bullet placement. If you hit a charging Buffalo in the Brain or the Spine it will drop dead on the spot, if you miss either of these shots it will have little effect whether you are using a 375 or 416 or 500 for that matter. Geoff Broom used a 375 double for years and shot countless Elephant Buffalo etc some of them on the charge.

The major difference today is good quality bullets. Back when Harry was hunting softs were not great and so everyone used solids and for a first shot from a client on Buffalo this was less than ideal esp; if they were hit in the back of the lungs it would punch a neat hole and the animal would sometimes run for miles. Therefore it stands to reason back then that the bigger the calibre the larger the hole, and so some people shied away from the 375. Today with so many great bullets available the 375 has once again become a popular calibre, with justification.Nevertheless the 375 would have been a wonderful all round calibre for Harry owing to how versatile it was.

On a passing note how can John DL say that Harry is a tottering old geezer and 40 years old field experince means nothing? As a PH of that many years he would have seen thousands of Buffalo cut up and seen first hand what effect bullets were having on animals and would have taken note. Shooting at sand bags and wooden planks is no substitute for performance in the field.
 
Posts: 80 | Location: South Africa | Registered: 12 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ozhunter
posted Hide Post
Russ,
I would assume that comment was made "tongue in cheek".
You'd be best to chill a bit mate. Wink
 
Posts: 5886 | Location: Sydney,Australia  | Registered: 03 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ozhunter:
Russ,
I would assume that comment was made "tongue in cheek".
You'd be best to chill a bit mate. Wink


As was mine Wink
 
Posts: 80 | Location: South Africa | Registered: 12 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bluefish
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Opus1:
Karamojo Bell killed over 1000 eles with a 7X57 and crappy bullets.

The .375 is enough gun, but I still like my .416 Rigby.


This has been demonstrated to be inaccurate in the past. Bell killed many with the 7x57 but of those many were killed with the 318 WR.

As far as "crappy bullets" is concerned, Bell himself indicated they were steel jacketed solids which, given their strength and his keen knowledge of elephant anatomy, was why he chose them.

FWIW, I would think the much maligned 338-06 with today's better er, not-crappy bullets would be an even better killer than the WR round was then!
 
Posts: 5232 | Location: The way life should be | Registered: 24 May 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
by Harry Selby:
The success of the .375 H&H Mag. also resulted in a range of so-called “improved” versions of the cartridge, usually by fire-forming the original case in an enlarged chamber in order to accommodate more powder and, thereby, increase velocity. In my opinion, these “improved” versions do not demonstrate any real advantage over the original Holland & Holland design—which is an extremely well balanced cartridge—other than some extra striking energy and a somewhat flatter trajectory. They certainly produce more noise, more muzzle blast and more recoil.



My opinion exactly, which means absolutely nothing to anyone but me I guess!

Though the so-called improved .375s are good cartridges they will never come even close to displacing the .375H&H, and have plenty of drawbacks, in cost and availability of ammo! .375H&H ammo is available in any country where large animals are hunted! That can’t be said of any of the so-called improved .375s, or the 416s either! 100 years of continuous use has said it is a fine cartridge, and I agree enough with that assessment, that I now own three rifles so chambered, and have owned a hunted with several others over the years!
.......................................................................... old


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Muletrain:
The 375 H&H has unmatched versatility. No argument there. It will do everything one could desire in the hands of a capable rifleman.

But...........it would not be a good idea to approach an elephant, especially multiple elephants, to within "sporting range" with anything less than a 470, preferably a double.

Hunting elephants with a 375 is perfectly fine and probably safe if you do it with one outfitted with a scope and you don't get any closer than 75 yards.

absolute unadulterated bullshit... i shot mine last week from a herd of 50 with a .416 at under 40 yards. then we had to sort out multiple bluff charges from others in the herd that stopped as close as 5-6 yards. one has to wonder about your big game experience.


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13587 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scriptus
posted Hide Post
Just a thought, I have read that Ron Thomson used a .458 Win-Mag for culling, but also a 7.62 FN FAL/SLR for really serious stuff like a total matriarchal/breeding herd cull.

absolute unadulterated bullshit. Calling it like is, aye, straight up hey Jdollar. Big Grin
 
Posts: 3297 | Location: South of the Equator. | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
shocker shocker shocker horse horse horse horse

If you don't like the .375 H&H, Do Not Use It. If you do, then by all means enjoy yourself. I think Mr. Selby has put in more than enough field time to know what he is talking about when discussing the .375 H&H, your mileage may vary.

I will continue using my .375 and believing that Mr. Selby is correct with his assessment of the cartridge.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Russ B:

I read Harry's article with interest and have a few comments to make regarding the 375.

I think a little to much is made of calibre rather than bullet placement. If you hit a charging Buffalo in the Brain or the Spine it will drop dead on the spot, if you miss either of these shots it will have little effect whether you are using a 375 or 416 or 500 for that matter. Geoff Broom used a 375 double for years and shot countless Elephant Buffalo etc some of them on the charge.

The major difference today is good quality bullets. Back when Harry was hunting softs were not great and so everyone used solids and for a first shot from a client on Buffalo this was less than ideal esp; if they were hit in the back of the lungs it would punch a neat hole and the animal would sometimes run for miles. Therefore it stands to reason back then that the bigger the calibre the larger the hole, and so some people shied away from the 375. Today with so many great bullets available the 375 has once again become a popular calibre, with justification.Nevertheless the 375 would have been a wonderful all round calibre for Harry owing to how versatile it was.

On a passing note how can John DL say that Harry is a tottering old geezer and 40 years old field experince means nothing? As a PH of that many years he would have seen thousands of Buffalo cut up and seen first hand what effect bullets were having on animals and would have taken note. Shooting at sand bags and wooden planks is no substitute for performance in the field.


To Russ: A Touche' on the tongue-in-cheek fencing.
tu2
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bluefish:
quote:
Originally posted by Opus1:
Karamojo Bell killed over 1000 eles with a 7X57 and crappy bullets.

The .375 is enough gun, but I still like my .416 Rigby.


This has been demonstrated to be inaccurate in the past. Bell killed many with the 7x57 but of those many were killed with the 318 WR.

As far as "crappy bullets" is concerned, Bell himself indicated they were steel jacketed solids which, given their strength and his keen knowledge of elephant anatomy, was why he chose them.

FWIW, I would think the much maligned 338-06 with today's better er, not-crappy bullets would be an even better killer than the WR round was then!


I believe the following information to be correct:

quote:

He shot exactly 1,011 elephants with a series of 6 Rigby-made 7x57mm (.275 Rigby) rifles with 173 grain military ammo.

He shot 300 elephants with a Mannlicher-Schoenauer 6.5x54mm carbine using the long 159 grain FMJ bullets.

He shot 200 pachyderms with the .303 and the 215 grain army bullet.

He went to a .318 Westley Richards for a while, which is a cartridge firing a 250 grain bullet at about 2400 fps, but found the ammunition unreliable and returned to the 7mm.

He also recorded that one of the reasons why he favored the 7x57 was that the ammunition was more reliable and he could not recall ever having a fault with it. Whereas British sporting ammunition, apart from the .303 military ammo, gave him endless trouble with splitting cases.( He used the .303 in the hope of running into a Herd of Bulls so he could make use of the 10shots ! He was famed for using a Martini in .303 & holding the spare rounds between his fingers & could fire the rifle as fast as a bolt action !)

The balance of his elephants were shot with this .318 and his .450/400 Jeffrey double rifle.

He wrote about being able to drop an elephant with a light caliber rifle if he shot it in the same place that he would have shot it with a heavy rifle.

It was unmentioned, but understood, that 7x57 ammunition cost a tenth the price of large caliber .450/400 Jeffrey cartridges and money is always a factor in business.

Just out of interest, it is must to be mention that to judge ammunition expenditure and his own shooting, he calculated an average. He discovered that with the .275 (7x57mm) he fired an average of 1.5 shots per kill. This means that half the time he only needed one shot. That is a fair performance for such a large number of elephants killed and considering that it is common today to fire an insurance shot, anyway. Seemingly a business man of a Hunter with a profit & loss acumen.

It is also interesting to note that, although Bell is the most famous proponent of using small caliber "nitro" rifles for large game, he did not discover the technique, nor was he its earliest advocate. Well known hunter Arthur Neumann, for example, had been shooting elephants with a .303 Lee Met ford rifle for years before Walter Bell got into the business.

WDM Bell is forever associated with the John Rigby & Sons Mauser rifle and the .275 Rigby cartridge. ".275 Rigby" was the British designation for the German 7x57mm Mauser cartridge. This cartridge propelled a .284 caliber, 173 grain bullet at around 2300 fps and the bullets he used for elephant brain shots were full metal jacketed solids. He declared once that a soft point bullet had never sullied the bore of his rifle. It is interesting to compare these ballistics with what is commonly regarded as essential performance today.


If the above information is not correct, I would certainly like to know the facts.

In regards to my crappy bullets comment, I should have been more clear in stating that military ammo in his day was no where near the standards of today’s ammunition.


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Frostbit
posted Hide Post
I forwarded this thread to Mr. Selby and frankly I wish I had not.

His feelings on the topic are rather simple to understand. He considers to 375 H&H to be an excellent all-around cartridge in the hands of a capable rifleman. Lack of ability will transfer bad results regardless of caliber.

He considers the 416 to be a capable stopping round, as are the heavier calibers. But since he considers shot placement to be far more important than cartridge size it is understandable why he stated in the past that he would prefer a hunter come to Africa with a 375 versus say a double rifle he is not proficient with. Most shooters would have a greater potential to be accurate with a 375.

I shoot both, I do not fear the recoil of the 416, but my 375 will be my primary rifle on any trip to Africa.

It's all about shot placement.

Cheers
Jim


______________________
DRSS
______________________
Hunt Reports

2015 His & Her Leopards with Derek Littleton of Luwire Safaris - http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/2971090112
2015 Trophy Bull Elephant with CMS http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/1651069012
DIY Brooks Range Sheep Hunt 2013 - http://forums.accuratereloadin...901038191#9901038191
Zambia June/July 2012 with Andrew Baldry - Royal Kafue http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/7971064771
Zambia Sept 2010- Muchinga Safaris http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/4211096141
Namibia Sept 2010 - ARUB Safaris http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/6781076141
 
Posts: 7625 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 05 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scriptus:
Just a thought, I have read that Ron Thomson used a .458 Win-Mag for culling, but also a 7.62 FN FAL/SLR for really serious stuff like a total matriarchal/breeding herd cull.

absolute unadulterated bullshit. Calling it like is, aye, straight up hey Jdollar. Big Grin

i call it as i see it- if it isn't a good idea to approach an elephant, especially in a herd, with anything less than a .470( "preferably a double"), then most PH's hunting elephant and other DG best quit. in 6 DG safaris( including the last one for elephant) only 1 PH used a double. 416 Rem, .458 Lott, .450 Rigby seemed to be considered acceptable by the guys who make a living with them.


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13587 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
He considers the 416 to be a capable stopping round, as are the heavier calibers. But since he considers shot placement to be far more important than cartridge size it is understandable why he stated in the past that he would prefer a hunter come to Africa with a 375 versus say a double rifle he is not proficient with. Most shooters would have a greater potential to be accurate with a 375.

I shoot both, I do not fear the recoil of the 416, but my 375 will be my primary rifle on any trip to Africa.

It's all about shot placement.


For those on this thread, consider the comments on shot placement an invitation to shoot lots of heavy-duty rounds, 416 and up. That is truly a win-win. You get lots of shooting, lots of recoil, and come out ready for stopping anything on the planet.

How much shooting is necessary? Until you are ready to take a guinea fowl with a 416 at 6000 ftlbs.



or a little 35 lb. oribi at 201 yards, drilled.



The drying/smoked body of the oribi shows the entry hole of the 416 well.



The second picture shows the offside exit wound where only pulp was left over where the heart was supposed to be.

when the rifle can be used for little game, it is ready to be used for dangerous game.

The 375 is good, and Selby would seem to agree that an accurately handled 416 is better.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
416Tanzan,
I cry FOUL on the guinea fowl!
Should have been a head shot!
Lot of meat wasted on the center-of-mass shot!
And a .375 H&H is perfectly adequate for any varmint hunting!!! Wink
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
416Tanzan,
I cry FOUL on the guinea fowl!
Should have been a head shot!
Lot of meat wasted on the center-of-mass shot!
And a .375 H&H is perfectly adequate for any varmint hunting!!! Wink


Wink

But RIP, it wasn't center of mass. It was top of breast gullet where the fowl had stopped and was standing upright. I'm not sure the 375 would have handled it.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    Harry Selby's Thoughts on the .375 H&H Magnum

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: