THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Berger Bullets
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dogcat:
quote:
Originally posted by KMG Hunting Safaris:
quote:
Originally posted by Jason P:
quote:
Originally posted by KevinNY:
How does a monolithic bullet explode? My son killed an eland with a 300 and TTSX at 100 yards that broke the femur and came to rest, no petals, under the skin of the opposite shoulder. That s a lot of eland to go through.


No idea! After I emailed Barnes, they did not know either.

PM me your email and I will send you pic and you can be the judge.


Jason, if you don't mind, please post it here. Would love to see. If you are not sure about how to post photos, you are welcome to email it to me. I can put it up for you.


No petals does not translate to "explode", it translates to "the petals broke off in the eland" which is not bad performance.

You will not get 100% retention on TSX or on Partitions. You frequently do on A-Frames and TBBC.


You've misinterpreted my post, my point was that my sons experience was perfect and deadly with the TTSX, and truly questioning how a monolithic bullet could "Explode". I'm still curious about Jasons experience, did the bullet kill the eland?
 
Posts: 1636 | Location: NC | Registered: 10 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Kevin:

Yes, it killed the eland.

I emailed the pic to Marius and I believe he’ll post it.

I don’t want to hijack the post as it is about Berger bullets. However, some might find the pic interesting. Maybe not….
 
Posts: 2698 | Location: Utah | Registered: 23 February 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of KMG Hunting Safaris
posted Hide Post
Here is the picture from Jason. Very interesting. So, if I understand you correctly Jason, this is the entry wound?



Marius Goosen
KMG Hunting Safaris
Cell, Whats App, Signal +27 828205387
E-mail: info@huntsafaris.co.za
Website: www.huntsafaris.co.za
Check us out on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kmghuntingsafaris
Instagram: @kmg_hunting_safaris

 
Posts: 1637 | Location: Eastern Cape | Registered: 27 October 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of RAR60
posted Hide Post
If that is in fact the entry wound that can only be the bullet failed somehow. As mentioned, used TTSX (tipped) and TSX many times and can have high blood shot area on exit never on entry. The rounds that I've recovered were all petaled out and very high weight retention.
Barnes also told me that proper expansion should happen regardless of range. Namely 30 yds out.
Is there a possibility that some rounds got mixed up?


Zim 2006
Zim 2007
Namibia 2013
Brown Bear Togiak Nat'l Refuge Sep 2010
Argentina 2019
RSA 2023
Tanzania 2024
Zimbabwe 2025
SCI Life Member
USMC
 
Posts: 338 | Registered: 26 February 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yes, it was the entry
 
Posts: 2698 | Location: Utah | Registered: 23 February 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Is there a possibility that some rounds got mixed up?


Either that or the bullet was tumbling when it made impact and why it did not "petal".
 
Posts: 2413 | Registered: 06 September 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If that is the shot that killed the eland then some part of the bullet would have penetrated the vitals. If a bullet bullet "blew up" on an eland shoulder (in what we would define as fully fragmented) you would be in for a long tracking job. Could you give us the full story? Not doubting you, just feeling like we have not heard the whole story which would put this interesting story to rest.
 
Posts: 1636 | Location: NC | Registered: 10 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by fulvio:
quote:
Is there a possibility that some rounds got mixed up?


Either that or the bullet was tumbling when it made impact and why it did not "petal".


I’m sure that there were no rounds that were mixed up. I’m no expert on bullet performance but it would be interesting to know the root cause of the failure….
 
Posts: 2698 | Location: Utah | Registered: 23 February 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jason P:
quote:
Originally posted by fulvio:
quote:
Is there a possibility that some rounds got mixed up?


Either that or the bullet was tumbling when it made impact and why it did not "petal".


I’m sure that there were no rounds that were mixed up. I’m no expert on bullet performance but it would be interesting to know the root cause of the failure….


It appears to me that bullet must have struck something before the eland. I've probably shot a hundred or so animals with the TSX or TTSX and never had one do that on the entry, UNLESS it struck some brush first.
 
Posts: 8612 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MikeE
posted Hide Post
I have had one TSX not perform fully as expected, and it definitely did hit either some grass or a small twig - the gemsbok did drop at the shot, we thought it was spine shot, my SIL was the shooter, 7MM Mag. No exit wound, we were less than 100 yards, probably about 70 yards away at the shot.

I paid ( reward) to the skinners to recover the bullet, it was intact, unexpanded. It was also bent, about 30 degrees. The entry looked MUCH like the above picture, shoulder was ruined, and again, no exit hole, which we had been seeing on almost every gemsbok we shot on that trip. I shot probably 50, yes 50 gemsbok, culling them for meat on a friends place in Namibia. Pretty much all had an exit hole.

We had stalked her gemsbok , pretty close, to give her a better shot opportunity. Sitting down, from sticks, she made what we though was a good shot, the animal dropped immediately, our first thought was "spine shot", that it was stunned and might get up and run. We were unable to get a follow up shot into it, but as it turned out, none were needed. There was some small brush and grass between her and the gemsbok, we figured that it was close enough not to appreciably affect the point of impact, but enough to tumble the bullet before impact.

We have seen very very few instances of TSX losing petals, more of a concern with TSX is taking LONG shots ( 4-500 yards ) where the impact velocity doesn't expand the bullet as much as closer shots do. Still, well delivered bullets, the animal does not run far, if at all.


Master of Boats,
Slayer of Beasts,
Charmer of the fair sex, ......
and sometimes changer of the diaper.....
 
Posts: 359 | Location: HackHousBerg, TX & LA | Registered: 12 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had a TTSX in a light for caliber bullet pretty much disintegrate on a wildebeest. Biggest fragment was like 20 grains.

This was a .338 185 grain out of a .330 Dakota. Velocity around 3200 FPS.

Point blank shot- maybe 20 yards away, hit the shoulder and went through. Animal ran maybe 50 yards and piled up.

Pretty big wound channel with bone fragments and what all. No exit wound.

It killed the animal quickly and cleanly, but that bullet did fail in my mind.

Probably over 100 animals that I’ve killed with Barnes bullets over the years and that’s the biggest failure.

I’ve had a couple with odd tracking in tissue and a couple that have lost a petal or two as well.

If that had been the first time I’d used them, I probably would have said I’ve got other options and moved on. That wasn’t the first animal I shot with that gun and load on that hunt, and the rest were all typical TSX performance, so why it happened I have no clue.
 
Posts: 12185 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
My TSX bullets have always killed game.

Petals have sheared off on some of them, but that has never mattered.

The bullets have just plowed on through and penetrated right on out the other side.

To me, no bullet is a failure if it kills like that.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 14374 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lavaca:
Recently got back from Tanzania and my light rifle was a Gunwerks 300 Win. Mag. They sell it as a system with a ballistic turret scope and their ammunition. I realize their focus is on long range shooting, but that's not mine. What I want my light rifle to do is to take care of things like leopard and croc at 100 yards or under and handle medium to small antelope out to 300 yards, maybe a tad more in a bind. So I'm cranking the ranges on the scope between 100 and 300 yards, not 500 or 600.

I think the Berger bullets are designed to open up at lower velocities at longer ranges, not to hold together at closer ranges and higher velocities.

I never got a pass through with a 190 grain Berger bullet on anything bigger than a leopard. Now it did wonders on the leopard and I'd say it was nearly the perfect leopard bullet, but no pass throughs on topi, hartebeest, even warthog. The reason became obvious with the small animals. It absolutely tore apart smaller stuff like oribi, and the impala I shot for bait. Clearly, this bullet is designed for longer ranges than are normally encountered in Africa and they open open up dramatically at close range and don't penetrate on large animals.

The problem I have now is I have no confidence in these bullets for my specialized use and there aren't many 190 grain alternatives, maybe the Barnes Vor-TX LRX 190 gr. Anyone have any real world experience with that bullet? Otherwise, we're going back to the drawing board, working up a new load and cutting a new ballistic turret. I won't hunt with Bergers again. Welcome any thoughts or suggestions. Other possibilities are Trophy Bonded Bearclaws, but I don't think Federal loads those in 300 Win Mag, or Swift A Frame, but that's either 180 grain or 200 grain. Other suggestions welcome.


For your needs at close range on tough game, the Barnes 190gr LRX is an excellent choice. It's designed for deep penetration and controlled expansion even at high velocities. The Swift A-Frame is another very reliable option if you can find a suitable weight.
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: 27 June 2025Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lavaca:
Recently got back from Tanzania and my light rifle was a Gunwerks 300 Win. Mag. They sell it as a system with a ballistic turret scope and their ammunition. I realize their focus is on long range shooting, but that's not mine. What I want my light rifle to do is to take care of things like leopard and croc at 100 yards or under and handle medium to small antelope out to 300 yards, maybe a tad more in a bind. So I'm cranking the ranges on the scope between 100 and 300 yards, not 500 or 600.

I think the Berger bullets are designed to open up at lower velocities at longer ranges, not to hold together at closer ranges and higher velocities.

I never got a pass through with a 190 grain Berger bullet on anything bigger than a leopard. Now it did wonders on the leopard and I'd say it was nearly the perfect leopard bullet, but no pass throughs on topi, hartebeest, even warthog. The reason became obvious with the small animals. It absolutely tore apart smaller stuff like oribi, and the impala I shot for bait. Clearly, this bullet is designed for longer ranges than are normally encountered in Africa and they open open up dramatically at close range and don't penetrate on large animals.

The problem I have now is I have no confidence in these bullets for my specialized use and there aren't many 190 grain alternatives, maybe the Barnes Vor-TX LRX 190 gr. Anyone have any real world experience with that bullet? Otherwise, we're going back to the drawing board, working up a new load and cutting a new ballistic turret. I won't hunt with Bergers again. Welcome any thoughts or suggestions. Other possibilities are Trophy Bonded Bearclaws, but I don't think Federal loads those in 300 Win Mag, or Swift A Frame, but that's either 180 grain or 200 grain. Other suggestions welcome.

Your analysis is correct. Bergers are designed for expansion at long range velocities. For close-range shots on tough game, the 100gr Barnes TSX is an excellent choice. It will provide deep penetration and controlled expansion. The Swift A-Frame 120gr would be another very reliable option if you can handle the slightly heavier bullet.
 
Posts: 36 | Registered: 27 June 2025Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2025 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia