THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Opinions: Blaser R8
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Every confirmed occurrence of a Blaser bolt kaboom issue that I've ever read about related to improper reloads.

Managing to close the bolt on a Blaser is no harder than doing so on a Benelli or avoiding limp wristing a 9mm Glock or Beretta. And not many would suggest that these platforms are questionable. Issues with all of these relate to operator error not weapon malfunctions.
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Below sea level. | Registered: 21 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The recall on the trigger pin was because they had installed some nonstainless trigger pins in th rifles.

They were concerned about the nonstainless steel pin rusting.

Well most other rifles do not have stainless trigger mechanisms, but Blaser still wanted to do the recall.

The one instance I know of where the bolt blew out the back of the rifle was where a fella in Europe reloaded a 300 WBY Magnum.

I was told:
The rifle showed high pressure on the first shot. If I remember correctly they had great difficulty getting the action open, after each shot. He continued to fire the rifle after even some of the collet fingers broke off.

The bolt head let go on the 13 or 14 shot, again IIRC.

He had loaded pistol powder in the 300 WBY at the same charge level that was normal for a slow buring rifle powder.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Walters problems were shooter error.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Anjin
posted Hide Post
Saeed, I think you have told that story before, but it is not only a good one that is well worth seeing again, but also makes an important point.

I've muddled around with rifles for decades. When I finally got a chance to shoot a cape buffalo, I used my custom .375 H&H on a rebarrelled Remington 700 push-feed action, one of the few economical options in those days for left hand actions.

After the first shot, the action froze and I could not extract the empty case. Did I ever look stupid!

Thankfully, the buff took off in the other direction, but we ended up tracking him for 11 hours and never did chase him down. Blame me for a lot of errors, but since then I've been more careful. I bought a nice H&H double 500/450 and every other rifle since that time has been a controlled feed Winchester 70 or similar. Now I'm ready.

From what you and a few others have said, and my own conservative nature, I'll pass on the Blaser, no matter how well it shoots.

And I'll bet that the 14-year-old girl that handled one so well had plenty of backup. Smiler

quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Grumulkin:
quote:
Originally posted by butchloc:
walter likes them shocker


And, it's one of Saeed's favorites.


Walter had all of us rolling on the ground laughing our heads off when he was trying to show us how accurate and fast his Blaser was.

We were in Zimbabwe, as we drove along, we saw a nice warthog.

The episode went something like this:

Roy "Walter, come, get your rifle and shoot that warthog!"

Walter "Yes yes, I am coming, I am coming" as jumped off the truck with his Blaser.

Alan had the video camera, and I had my still camera to make sure we have this historic event for future generations to enjoy.

The warthog was standing among a lot of dead tree trunks on the ground, and was hard to see because he blended in very well.

Roy put the shooting sticks up, and Walter got onto them.

But no shot came!

Someone said "shoot the bloody thing! He is not going to stand there all day!"

Walter "Where is he? I cannot see him!"

Roy "THERE, standing by that log!"
Walter "Which log? I see many logs and none look like a warhog!"

Some of the new members here might think this is something I am making up. But, I can assure you that this is just a normal hunt with Walter.

The warthog moved, and Walter saw him.

Walter fired at the warthog, missing him.

The warthog moved a few feet and stood looking back, probably laughing as he looked at someone pointing some funny contraption at him.

Roy "You missed him! Shoot again, and don't take all day about it!"

Walter fires again, and hits the warthog.

It was only wounded.

And Walter was trying his best to show us how quickly he can load that Blaser.

He pulls the bolt back far enough to eject the empty, but not far enough to pick a new round from the magazine.

He closes the bolt on an empty chamber.

CLICK!

Walter works the bolt so fast now, trying to shoot again.

He works teh wbolt again.

CLICK!

Now he has worked himself into a real lather!

Works the bolt again.

CLICK.

He picks up the ejected roud and says "Saeed's ammo. It does not work!"

I pick up the round he angrily dropped on teh ground.

There is no indent on the primer.

His new fangled Blaser misfired - I think in his haste to load it he did not push the bolt far enough forward.

Eventually, he maneged to kill the warthog.

I was lying on the ground, because I was laughing so much I was not able to stand up.

Walter proved to us how good the Blaser is in a sticky situation.

From that day on, I decided the Blaser is definitely not for me.

I will stick with a normal bolt action rifle.


Norman Solberg
International lawyer back in the US after 25 years and, having met a few of the bad guys and governments here and around the world, now focusing on private trusts that protect wealth from them. NRA Life Member for 50 years, NRA Endowment Member from 2014, NRA Patron from 2016.
 
Posts: 554 | Location: Sandia Mountains, NM | Registered: 05 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Pieter Kriel
posted Hide Post
Have only hunted with one hunter using a Blaser. He loved his and got 4 shots off in the same time I managed 3.

His worked fine.


Mkulu African Hunting Safaris
www.huntinginafricasafaris.com
hunt@huntinginafricasafaris.com
 
Posts: 210 | Location: Pretoria | Registered: 08 April 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Blasers aren't for everyone. When operator error causes the problem blame the gun. Blasers require a minimum amount of intelligence to operate. So does a Model 70. Mine work just fine.
 
Posts: 1557 | Location: Texas | Registered: 26 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grumulkin
posted Hide Post
ANY gun can blow up with a malfunction or shooter error. Here is a link to a test in which rifles were shot with an occluded barrel. Notice how the R 93 did not blow up in the shooter's face.

Rifle Burst Test
 
Posts: 2911 | Location: Ohio, U.S.A. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Grumulkin, the R93 handles pressure very well. That's something that Blaser has always been very happy to point out.

Bolts didn't blow because of excess pressure. Bolts blow back in the shooter's face when gases from a ruptured case or whatever else make their way between the bolt body and the locking fingers, while at the same time exerting pressure on the tip of the fingers, pushing them down the slope of the locking cone.

The gases blow the fingers out like a balloon, and the tips (which happen to be locking the bolt in the barrel's conical locking recess...) retract along the cone of the bolt head, and the corresponding conical surface of the barrel recess. Freeing the whole thing, and... Ka-Booom.

End of the bolt-in-face mystery.

And reason for the complete redesign of the R8 bolt head: there is no cone any more, the fingers' tips are now forming a ring almost at 90deg from the bolt body, and they have been reinforced in their midsection.

Give a look. Check a longitudinal cross-section drawing. Think about the way it is designed, check pictures of blown bolts, figure the whole thing out... And here it is: a flawed design. And a manufacturer who tries to sweep the cat's poop under the carpet: "The R8 is soo much better than the R93, look, it's got a detachable magazine! And a thumbhole if you want! And plastic all over! Fantastic! What did you say? The bolt redesign? Never mind, that's just cosmetics, nothing to say about that, it's just an irrelevant minor component..."
 
Posts: 1252 | Location: East Africa | Registered: 14 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Philip A.:
Grumulkin, the R93 handles pressure very well. That's something that Blaser has always been very happy to point out.

Bolts didn't blow because of excess pressure. Bolts blow back in the shooter's face when gases from a ruptured case or whatever else make their way between the bolt body and the locking fingers, while at the same time exerting pressure on the tip of the fingers, pushing them down the slope of the locking cone.

The gases blow the fingers out like a balloon, and the tips (which happen to be locking the bolt in the barrel's conical locking recess...) retract along the cone of the bolt head, and the corresponding conical surface of the barrel recess. Freeing the whole thing, and... Ka-Booom.

End of the bolt-in-face mystery.

And reason for the complete redesign of the R8 bolt head: there is no cone any more, the fingers' tips are now forming a ring almost at 90deg from the bolt body, and they have been reinforced in their midsection.

Give a look. Check a longitudinal cross-section drawing. Think about the way it is designed, check pictures of blown bolts, figure the whole thing out... And here it is: a flawed design. And a manufacturer who tries to sweep the cat's poop under the carpet: "The R8 is soo much better than the R93, look, it's got a detachable magazine! And a thumbhole if you want! And plastic all over! Fantastic! What did you say? The bolt redesign? Never mind, that's just cosmetics, nothing to say about that, it's just an irrelevant minor component..."


What a great design, fugly as it is! Seems that just a little digging quickly causes the bloom to fall off the rose! I'm still firmly in the PASS camp!!
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Todd, (or was it Turd?), you're not welcome in the Blaser camp anyway :-)
 
Posts: 20175 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Biebs:
Todd, (or was it Turd?), you're not welcome in the Blaser camp anyway :-)


sofa
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Philip A.:
Give a look. Check a longitudinal cross-section drawing. Think about the way it is designed, check pictures of blown bolts, figure the whole thing out... And here it is: a flawed design.


Evolutionary improvements in firearms (or any other) designs generally mean only that prior fine and serviceable designs have been bettered in some respect or other. They do not in and of themselves mean that any prior design was fundamentally flawed.

That is true of the Mauser M98 and its many predecessor designs, the Winchester M70 and M54 and many others. And I would suggest that it is likewise true of the Blaser R8 and its predecessors, the R93 and R84.

As others have said, the R93 failures cited by critics are very few in number, and in all cases of which I am aware, resulted from gross negligence in handloading, a/k/a operator error at the Three Stooges end of the spectrum.

As to your particular point concerning case failures in the R93, I can report that I personally have had a case rupture in my R93, in a defective Remington factory load in caliber .375 H&H Mag. My R93 handled the case failure with ease, with no gas blowback, and despite your suggestion to the contrary, certainly no bolt blowback! And I can't be the only one of well over a hundred thousand R93 owners who has survived, and whose rifle has survived, such a calamity completely unscathed!

The R8 may be an improvement over the R93 in terms of lock up, but such improvement does not mean that the R93 is somehow flawed or unsafe. I have used and will continue to use mine on dangerous and other game without hesitation.

And for the record, no design of any kind is or can be foolproof. Fools are far too ingenious!


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13755 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Todd doesn't have the right to poo poo on someting he is not capable of understanding Jon. What he is capable of understanding is that every negative post is increasing the cost of his reloading supplies. You can't change some peoples minds. I gave up trying. He's a lost cause. I like the way the R8 feels well enough that I ordered a .375 barrel today (with an extra trigger group in case mine becomes lost or falls out) Pay him no mind.
 
Posts: 4214 | Location: Southern Colorado | Registered: 09 October 2011Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
Gentlemen,

We had a German gunsmith visiting us a couple of years back, and he said he know of at least a couple fo dozen occasions of the Blaser R93 blowing up.

I have no way of knowing how true that is.

But, I have my own theory about what might happen, from seeing people shooting their Blasers here.

I see some people who tend to just push the bolt forward slightly, and let it close by itself. We have had misfires sometimes when this is done, and, frankly, that got me scared.

So I always ask whoever is shooting a Blaser here to make sure that they push the bolt forward.

This, of course, is no fault of the rifle, but is an operator error.

Trouble is, it is very easy to do, and I am not really sure might happen when a sensetive primer hit when the bolt is not fully closed.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69269 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
Saeed

Here is a page with pictures, Names and address of actual incidences

So no rumours It was complied by somebody I actually know quite well and hunted with for many years

http://lutz-moeller-jagd.de/Wa.../R93/Blaser-R93.html

Well me an my friend skeetshot have been contributing on a blaser handbag forum for some time and he is also a moderator

But if we debate anything slightly off piste about BLASER will immediate get a reflex reaction from Ron Williams ( a red neck truck driver ) who kills paper targets the majority of the time and a few deers

We have both left the site some months ago when they start talking about German chocolates

Siruation got even worse when the owner has to start new threads under a FALSE name WILLIAM BONE RULE in order to keep the thread count high

When I caught him out he threatened me with the following private message "

Can you imagine Saeed doing that !

On 21.2.2013. 18:33, Corjack wrote:

I am not supposed to be on this forum

We have two choices here

1. You stop referring my name as Corjack when I post as William bone rule

2. I shut down the website

Your cooperation will be appreciated

Ron
There are no fleas on the 9.3s


If one takes time to go over moeller's page then you will see it is not a one sided story

There are statements and communications from prof houses and engineers as well

I personally like the system but I do not venture into the unknown

There are many merits to the system so can't say its all bad

But when its dangerous game I would not bet my life on it

Saeed is spot on missed fires are exactly that OPERATOR ERROR

Facts is practice makes perfect

And these individuals only practice on paper most of the time or non dangerous game

When the chips are down everything tightens except the bolt and their sphincter muscles

A miss fire and they piss themselves and Saeed pisses himself laughing !

Listen guys I shoot and hunt a r93 and k95 so I am not knocking it completely

I like it and I practice a loooooot

But for dangerous game I use my trusty double and I don't need pampers
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pagosawingnut:
Todd doesn't have the right to poo poo on someting he is not capable of understanding Jon. What he is capable of understanding is that every negative post is increasing the cost of his reloading supplies. You can't change some peoples minds. I gave up trying. He's a lost cause. I like the way the R8 feels well enough that I ordered a .375 barrel today (with an extra trigger group in case mine becomes lost or falls out) Pay him no mind.


Rick ... barf

Sorry buddy. Smiler
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What I noticed is that hunters with not so strong hands (mostly women) have difficulties to cock and decock the R93 and R8 mechanism. In a few cases I noted that against that background they simply leave the rifle cocked. Of course this is dangerous and totally against the concept. Blaser cannot be blamed for this but I would advise to try the mechanism first before buying it.
 
Posts: 701 | Location: Germany | Registered: 24 February 2006Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
In September 2012 my client was hunting buffalo with a Blaser R8 Safari in calibre 0.458Lott at Omay Zimbabwe. He got a buffalo with a one shot kill. The rifle worked perfectly and he was very satisfied.
 
Posts: 23 | Registered: 14 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grumulkin
posted Hide Post
I know the Blaser R 93 and R 8 are referred to as "bolt action" rifles but they're not that exactly. Sure, they have a bolt and a handle like the bolt action of yore but in my opinion, they're really more closely related to a pump action gun.

With that in mind, they don't have the mechanical advantage in chambering a cartridge that a real bolt action rifle does. Factory new or full length sized cases would be advised.

I have been in the situation with my R 93 where the bolt didn't close completely and I pulled the trigger. Guess what? Nothing happened.

As for some not having the strength to cock and decock the R 93, the same thing applies to some who can't work the slide on a handgun, etc. In those instances, they just need to use something else.
 
Posts: 2911 | Location: Ohio, U.S.A. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jorge
posted Hide Post
That "nothing happened" happened to quite a few folks on hunting shows this past season.


USN (ret)
DRSS Verney-Carron 450NE
Cogswell & Harrison 375 Fl NE
Sabatti Big Five 375 FL Magnum NE
DSC Life Member
NRA Life Member

 
Posts: 7149 | Location: Orange Park, Florida. USA | Registered: 22 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
All the malfunctions aside, you still can't get past this one fact. All the nice, pretty wood and engraving on a Blaser is simply lipstick. You can make it look like this all you want:



It's still just a glamor shot of what really lies beneath:



jumping Cool

Rick, I know, I know. I'll never be able to afford those dies and shell holders now!! lol
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
LOLOLOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't think a case of Viagra will make that go away!
 
Posts: 20175 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jorge
posted Hide Post
I wouldn't do her even with shootaway's Johnson!


USN (ret)
DRSS Verney-Carron 450NE
Cogswell & Harrison 375 Fl NE
Sabatti Big Five 375 FL Magnum NE
DSC Life Member
NRA Life Member

 
Posts: 7149 | Location: Orange Park, Florida. USA | Registered: 22 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jorge:
I wouldn't do her even with shootaway's Johnson!


Shootaway would miss the hole and blame it on a fouled bore..



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jorge:
That "nothing happened" happened to quite a few folks on hunting shows this past season.


Some of these Blaser guys are fanatics. And fanatics don't need no stinking facts...



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The fact that there are plenty of Blaser fanatics among the experienced riflemen on this forum is a telling fact in and of itself.

The fact that only one or two detractors purportedly has ever used one is also a pretty telling fact.
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Below sea level. | Registered: 21 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The rifle has a known, documented, potentially fatal design defect. Yet it is not allowed to be acknowledged or discussed by the die hard Blaser shooters? For what reason other than pride and ego?

Using your logic there are plenty of highly experienced riflemen on this site that won't touch one due to severe design flaw issues which Blaser does it's best to hide and sweep under the carpet instead of acknowledging and fixing. Also a telling fact.

I am not telling anybody here not to shoot one. I on the other hand choose not to. And I choose not to based on the information that is readily available about the safety issues this platform has had. That and the negative experience I had with mine.

If the R-8 fixes those issues I'd be willing to try it, however due to Balser's lack of acknowledgment and poor ethics and lack of responsibility on the R-93 safety issues it has become a company that I am not willing to trust or do business with.

All that means in the big picture is more Blasers for you. My thoughts on the subject don't affect anybody or anything other than this information needs to be made available to anybody who is considering purchasing one these rifles. That is the ethical answer, to give people all of the information pluses and the negatives and then let them decide once they have all the facts not just the sunshine.



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No one is telling you what to believe. You're entitled to believe the sky is green if you so desire.

Not touching a Blaser ever = no experience at all. You're right, I discount commentary from the truly uninformed. But they're still entitled to hold these "beliefs" based on Internet hearsay and what Uncle Eddie's first cousin's, grass cutter's nanny overheard at the Dollar General.

If a documented, potentially fatal design defect is simply succumbing to the incredible stupidity of people, then every knife on the market has a documented potentially fatal design design defect. Better make that every gun too.

I don't even have a Blaser anymore, but I am most amused at the idea that Blaser's are ticking time bombs or that it's such a chore to close the bolt adequately.
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Below sea level. | Registered: 21 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yet you totally dismiss the multiple documented cases of destructive bolt blow back causing serious injury?

No green sky, internet or uncle Eddie needed.

When I first started to read about the injuries caused by R-93 bolt failures I owned an R-93. I called Blaser USA and asked what was going on and if there was any truth to these reports. The rep told me that yes there have been some safety issues with the bolts, that yes there had been injuries, that they were being looked into and that he'd get back to me with a definitive answer as to why these bolts had failed.

I am still waiting for that phone call. that was 5 or 6 years ago.

So the question is not if they failed, they did. But as to why? And why Blaser has not gone public with the reason. Gee let me guess. Uncle eddie told them not to? The sky was to green that day? Maybe the report got snagged in the grass cutter? Or maybe Blaser has identified a serious design flaw that opens them up to major litigation and they are trying to keep it quiet. Or maybe there isn't a design problem at all, but until I have a definitive answer I'll simply pass on their product.



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post

Circa 1911 modern warfare, remember the year that the evolution of the firearm peaked with no need to advancement.
The world is not flat and things change even if we don't want it to.
We don't have to embrace change but to argue the merits of progressive thinking in seeing where we can take the advancement of the firearm over time has brought us some very interesting developments. John Browning for one I would have loved to have taken with to see how he thinks.
We do not all have minds that are open to change but it can be comical at times to see how people think or how they want everyone to think there way. It doesn't work that way. For some the Internet must be a frustrating place because they cant talk over the conversation to get there point accross. Some have to go along with the heard and some make it up as they go.
Guns are very dangerous if you obstruct the barrels or load the wrong powder. Firearms are not for the careless no matter the brand. There are so many agendas by people out there I get tired head trying to follow those that are probably intelligent when they lump themselves in with all the normal idiots. Eventually they all start to sound the same muddled mess.
If Blaser ever comes up online it's like trying to explain the world is actually round. I have found if you have "Blaser" in your online name you sort out the bullies in the crowed pretty quick. Times do change but small thinking will be around forever
 
Posts: 90 | Registered: 28 June 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hearsay 1:



Hearsay 2:



Factual technicalities:



Quick explanation:

If high pressure gases, for whatever reason, end up in the red space around the bolt head, they'll exert pressure on the fingertips in A.

If the same gases, for whatever reason, find their way between bolt and finger blades in B and the same space to the right of B, they'll exert pressure outwards.

If sufficient pressure is applied in A and B, the blades will buckle outwards within space C.

This will unlock the bolt.

Bonus tip: the extractor slot on the bolt is an ideal route for gases to get where they should not... Look at the pictures and draw your own conclusions.

End of explanation.

Now, you are free to do whatever you want with this information. But if you want to convince me that such a system is what I should use to blow high pressure cartridges 6" away from my face, you'll have a hard time...
 
Posts: 1252 | Location: East Africa | Registered: 14 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Nope - I dismiss stupidity resulting in a few cases of hearsay incidents. I don't personally know a single person who has ever had any such trouble with a Blaser. Do you? Didn't think so.

How many people on this board and throughout the US regularly use Blasers? How many of these folks are campaigning against Blaser, and it's so-called design defects. Mostly just the folks who've never even held one in their hands ....

Where are the lawsuits against Blaser? Where is the US class action? Jeez man, Block Buster was sued via class action for improperly calculating late fees on returned videos - you don't think if mass produced and widely available Blasers had so-called, obvious design defects and were injuring people left and right, we wouldn't be seeing news stories and lawsuits?

I'm all for you passing on the product if you don't like it. That's part of Capitalism. But if you'll read above, the vast majority of complaints come from people who don't have any first hand knowledge and haven't even handled a Blaser. While you may not fit that mold, most of your like minded compadres do.
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Below sea level. | Registered: 21 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Blaserguy:

Circa 1911 modern warfare, remember the year that the evolution of the firearm peaked with no need to advancement.
The world is not flat and things change even if we don't want it to.
We don't have to embrace change but to argue the merits of progressive thinking in seeing where we can take the advancement of the firearm over time has brought us some very interesting developments. John Browning for one I would have loved to have taken with to see how he thinks.
We do not all have minds that are open to change but it can be comical at times to see how people think or how they want everyone to think there way. It doesn't work that way. For some the Internet must be a frustrating place because they cant talk over the conversation to get there point accross. Some have to go along with the heard and some make it up as they go.
Guns are very dangerous if you obstruct the barrels or load the wrong powder. Firearms are not for the careless no matter the brand. There are so many agendas by people out there I get tired head trying to follow those that are probably intelligent when they lump themselves in with all the normal idiots. Eventually they all start to sound the same muddled mess.
If Blaser ever comes up online it's like trying to explain the world is actually round. I have found if you have "Blaser" in your online name you sort out the bullies in the crowed pretty quick. Times do change but small thinking will be around forever




New technology isn't always without design faults.

Simple question requiring a simple answer. Are you saying that the above photographs of failed R-93 bolts are 100% caused by reloader error?

And if so do you have definitive proof?



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tygersman:
No one is telling you what to believe. You're entitled to believe the sky is green if you so desire.

Not touching a Blaser ever = no experience at all. You're right, I discount commentary from the truly uninformed. But they're still entitled to hold these "beliefs" based on Internet hearsay and what Uncle Eddie's first cousin's, grass cutter's nanny overheard at the Dollar General.

If a documented, potentially fatal design defect is simply succumbing to the incredible stupidity of people, then every knife on the market has a documented potentially fatal design design defect. Better make that every gun too.

I don't even have a Blaser anymore, but I am most amused at the idea that Blaser's are ticking time bombs or that it's such a chore to close the bolt adequately.


I don't need to shoot one to hold the personal opinion that they are ugly. No amount of performance is going to change that for me. If you like them, have at it. You're not going to change my opinion of their looks and once a gun is determined to be accurate, functional, and reliable (obviously the most important aspect), appearance then enters the equation for me. Tell you what, if you want me to hunt and shoot with a gun that I think is ugly, you buy it for me with your money. I'll stick it in the safe for awhile, then put it in the classifieds! Deal?

Originally posted by Blaserguy:

quote:
... it can be comical at times to see how people think or how they want everyone to think there way.


Pot calling the kettle black if I ever saw it!! I'll make you the same deal as I did with Tygersman! Does that work for you?
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Everyone take their ball and go home. Geeeez
 
Posts: 20175 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by tygersman:
No one is telling you what to believe. You're entitled to believe the sky is green if you so desire.

Not touching a Blaser ever = no experience at all. You're right, I discount commentary from the truly uninformed. But they're still entitled to hold these "beliefs" based on Internet hearsay and what Uncle Eddie's first cousin's, grass cutter's nanny overheard at the Dollar General.

If a documented, potentially fatal design defect is simply succumbing to the incredible stupidity of people, then every knife on the market has a documented potentially fatal design design defect. Better make that every gun too.

I don't even have a Blaser anymore, but I am most amused at the idea that Blaser's are ticking time bombs or that it's such a chore to close the bolt adequately.


I don't need to shoot one to hold the personal opinion that they are ugly. No amount of performance is going to change that for me. If you like them, have at it. You're not going to change my opinion of their looks and once a gun is determined to be accurate, functional, and reliable (obviously the most important aspect), appearance then enters the equation for me. Tell you what, if you want me to hunt and shoot with a gun that I think is ugly, you buy it for me with your money. I'll stick it in the safe for awhile, then put it in the classifieds! Deal?


Todd: Since you readily admit that your objection is to the Blasers' appearance, my comments weren't intended for you, but instead for the closet conspiracy theorists.

And while I won't be buying you any guns, I might buy you a beer at DSC, maybe even with my money.
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Below sea level. | Registered: 21 March 2010Reply With Quote
new member
Picture of icebug
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:




If that is a picture of a woman that gives you wood, I don't blame you for finding Blaser rifles ugly Whistling


"People never lie so much as before an election, during a war, or after a hunt." - Otto von Bismarck
 
Posts: 1 | Location: Europe | Registered: 19 February 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Blaser seems to have been selling an unsound design, with an inbuilt disaster potential in the R93...

All complaints have always been vigorously denied by Blaser....they have presisely the same arrogant approach as the Bavaria boat manufacurer, denying all complaints while keels were falling off their boats during sailing..

I will not deal with any of these products, whatsoever..



 
Posts: 3974 | Location: Vell, I yust dont know.. | Registered: 27 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
Bavaria boats ?

Do you mean Swiss navy ?
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pondoro:
Blaser seems to have been selling an unsound design, with an inbuilt disaster potential in the R93...

All complaints have always been vigorously denied by Blaser....they have presisely the same arrogant approach as the Bavaria boat manufacurer, denying all complaints while keels were falling off their boats during sailing..

I will not deal with any of these products, whatsoever..


But the Bavaria boat keels only fell off after the captain's R93 Blaser misfired, sending the bolt through the vessel's hull, which set off a chain of events ultimately resulting the death of Abraham Lincoln or someone else wearing a top hat.
 
Posts: 662 | Location: Below sea level. | Registered: 21 March 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: