THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
scope for DGR
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of JohnAir
posted
I have seen that many use the Leupold 2.5-8 x36. Why is this? Are they especialy durable?
 
Posts: 572 | Registered: 04 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JefferyDenmark
posted Hide Post
If it is for a DSGR make sure that it mounted with a detachable mount like EAW pivot or something in that department.
I have a leupold 1,5-5 variXIII but would like the svarowski 1,25-4
I only have a scope on my DGR so I can take other game with it on a longer range that I plan to hunt DG on.

Cheers,

Andre
 
Posts: 2293 | Location: The Kingdom of Denmark | Registered: 13 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
My .404 wears a Leup. 1.5x5. Anything much over 5x is probably more scope than you need & eye relief suffers. After all, it's a DG rifle, your shots aren't going to be much over 100yds.
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JohnAir
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys. Makes sense to me.
 
Posts: 572 | Registered: 04 January 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of retreever
posted Hide Post
Most important long eye relief so you do not get a permanent eye ring...DG is supposed to be shot at close range and nothing is dangerous at 100yds..IMO...I have a 1.5/5x VariXIII on my 458 Lott and it is more than adequate.. Mike
 
Posts: 6768 | Location: Wyoming, Pa. USA | Registered: 17 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
By DGR do you mean for lion and leopard? In that case, I think a 2.5-8 would be great. Same for hippo in the water.

But for buffalo and elephant, I would go with a 1.5-5 or 1.76-6 for calibers up to .416. For .458 and above, I would stick to a Leupold 2.5x compact because they have a really short eyepiece and won't hit you in the forehead.

This time I plan to try out irons only. To be honest, I felt the scope was a disadvantage.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of cummins cowboy
posted Hide Post
what about the Ruger RSM rifles, is there a way to make the scope quick release on these or are you stuck with the Ruger ring setup
 
Posts: 1755 | Location: slc Ut | Registered: 22 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
CC, Warne & I beleive some others make lever rings for the Ruger rifles.
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If it's .458 lott or greater I would reccomend the 2.5x compact leupold for it's ability to handle recoil.
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of retreever
posted Hide Post
CC,

I have Warne QR mounts of my Ruger 458 Lott..They are working super..

Mike
 
Posts: 6768 | Location: Wyoming, Pa. USA | Registered: 17 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It is a great scope but for most DGRs it is more scope than the caliber can handle from a trajectory standpoint..I also am a fan of the 1.5x5X Leupold on the real big bores above .375 caliber, and I could get by with that scope on any rifle and never look back...

My friend Saeed uses a 2.5x8 Leupold on his 375-404 Wildcat, but hey with a 250,270 gr. bullet that gun shoots as flat as a .270 Win or 25-06, so its a great scope for such calibers...

I have a 2.5x8X on my 300 H&H and a 2x7 on my .308..but I could get by just fine with a 4x on every gun I own and never look back...
 
Posts: 42226 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I have a set Warne detachable for the Ruger No 1. Honestly, I think they look pretty awkward on the rifle. They seem overly "chunky" where the don't need to be. Part of that may be do to the fact that they are mounted on a barrel rib on the Ruger No 1. The mount overhangs the rib considerably. I am getting rid of mine and going back to Ruger's.
 
Posts: 27 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

DG is supposed to be shot at close range and nothing is dangerous at 100yds..IMO...Mike



True! Until you wound it that is And then 100 yds seem like 10
 
Posts: 3035 | Location: Tanzania - The Land of Plenty | Registered: 19 September 2003Reply With Quote
<allen day>
posted
I've used Leupold 1.5-5X, Leupold 2.5-8X, and Leica 1.76-6X scopes on dangerous game.

Curently, my .375 H&H wears a Leupold 1.75-6X, my .416 Remington a Leupold 1.5-5X, and my .458 Winchester a Leupold 1.5-5X

I have nothing but positive things to say about all of these scopes. They're tough, durable, optically excellent, the adjustments have been superb, and--maybe best of all--the eye-relief is extremely generous.

If I had only one scope for dangerous game use, it would be a Leupold 1.5-5X VX III.........

AD
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: