THE ACCURATE RELOADING CLASSIC AND SPORTS CAR FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Other Topics  Hop To Forums  Classic And Sports Cars    Jay Leno's '66 7 litre Ford restoration video
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Jay Leno's '66 7 litre Ford restoration video
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
35 minute video

The first part of this vid about his 6 passenger whaleboat of a grocery-getter is hi-larious. Although the very end where he's bragging about how it now handles so well yet can't keep in his lane rounding a curve on a milti-lane highway is too!
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heavy Barrel
posted Hide Post
I'll put my grocery getter up against his anytime. Big Grin


 
Posts: 88 | Location: Central PA | Registered: 17 February 2008Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
And I would put money on your grocery getter! Big Grin



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Heavy Barrel:
I'll put my grocery getter up against his anytime.


You certainly got him beat by number of doors and tailgates.

 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of someoldguy
posted Hide Post
For sure, my money would be on 'Barrel's Mopar "Grocery Getter" also.
I'm familiar with the 7-liter Galaxie. We generally referred to it as the 428, as distinct from the 427. It was decent for applying rubber to the road, but its 345 horsepower was overrated. It did produce a lot of torque, but at low rpms. In a quarter mile, the stock version would only run around the low 16's at about 87-88 mph. In other words, a 1966 GTO or something similar was going to beat the Galaxie like a rug. With that heavy body, the more powerful 427 side-oiler would make the quarter in low 15s/high 14s. Not very impressive by today's standards, but it's okay for a car of that size.


_________________________

Glenn

 
Posts: 942 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 16 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
there's a Dr here in town that drives a white, white w/red bucket seat interior and 4-speed convertible. He bought it new. I ask him every time I see him in it, he just tells me to leave the check blank...

Rich
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by someoldguy:
For sure, my money would be on 'Barrel's Mopar "Grocery Getter" also.
I'm familiar with the 7-liter Galaxie. We generally referred to it as the 428, as distinct from the 427. It was decent for applying rubber to the road, but its 345 horsepower was overrated. It did produce a lot of torque, but at low rpms. In a quarter mile, the stock version would only run around the low 16's at about 87-88 mph. In other words, a 1966 GTO or something similar was going to beat the Galaxie like a rug. With that heavy body, the more powerful 427 side-oiler would make the quarter in low 15s/high 14s. Not very impressive by today's standards, but it's okay for a car of that size.


Not to mention the narrow rubber of the day. I would imagine they did well from a roll.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of someoldguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Not to mention the narrow rubber of the day. I would imagine they did well from a roll.


Yep, the narrow tires definitely hampered performance of most of the cars from back in the day!
One thing about the 428, or 7 litre, that I recall was the fuel economy. It was actually pretty doggone good! I think you could get about 20mpg at reasonable (not-too-fun) speeds, but I'm pretty sure that was with the stock axle ratio of 2.80:1.


_________________________

Glenn

 
Posts: 942 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 16 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
As I recall, the ratio on my 59 Olds is 2.73. But it has very long legs to run with.
 
Posts: 16301 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Leno's dad must have been very trusting, letting his son pick out the engine option on the dealer order form. My dad would have been more like Red Forman; getting his foot in my ass for even asking.

He always chose the 'small V8' in the Ford ranchwagons he ordered. Perhaps that's why I never wrapped one around a pole like Leno.
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by someoldguy:
For sure, my money would be on 'Barrel's Mopar "Grocery Getter" also.
I'm familiar with the 7-liter Galaxie. We generally referred to it as the 428, as distinct from the 427. It was decent for applying rubber to the road, but its 345 horsepower was overrated. It did produce a lot of torque, but at low rpms. In a quarter mile, the stock version would only run around the low 16's at about 87-88 mph. In other words, a 1966 GTO or something similar was going to beat the Galaxie like a rug. With that heavy body, the more powerful 427 side-oiler would make the quarter in low 15s/high 14s. Not very impressive by today's standards, but it's okay for a car of that size.


Who wouldn't want an FE in a Fairlane?

It isn't like Ford big blocks have stood still in time. If you have a 428, you have something to build on. Dove Engineering is one place to start.

Not like I'd kick a factory 428 with high rise heads and intake out of bed (yeah, I know, you couldn't get 'em from the factory like that; I'm just observing you could slap them on).

I don't know about you, but I sure could use an FE gracing my garage. One with Le Mans Valve covers and dual quads.

Something like this:

 
Posts: 8938 | Location: Dallas TX | Registered: 11 October 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by China Fleet Sailor:
I don't know about you, but I sure could use an FE gracing my garage. One with Le Mans Valve covers and dual quads.

Something like this:



Wouldn't break my heart..... Big Grin



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Other Topics  Hop To Forums  Classic And Sports Cars    Jay Leno's '66 7 litre Ford restoration video

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia