One of Us
| I would recommend a Leupold M8-6X if you can find one, and the 42mm exit reticle is better than the 36. A 4X will work, but the six is much better, and it will do all you need to do out to 200 yards, including working up loads. |
| |
One of Us
| Thank you for taking the time to reply...I do appreciate the advice! Arthur Olds |
| Posts: 201 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 21 December 2003 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36b27/36b2724b93ce1390fc302d3ef4c98e803a143a28" alt="Picture of ted thorn Picture of ted thorn"
| I ran a 4X Nikon Monarch on my Knight for six years but this past year swapped it for a VariX II 3x9x40 I am pleased with being able to change the power for sighting and longer shots that 4X might have been just fine but
________________________________________________ Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper Proudly made in the USA Acepting all forms of payment
|
| Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
one of us
| I never felt the muzzle loader shot flat enough for more than a 2.5X..but then I like a 2.5 or 3X on about any modern weapon, at least for deer and elk. Never have I felt the need for more scope in big game hunting.
Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120
rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
|
| Posts: 42442 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1dc7/e1dc7ed1836d7992cac0188a1b2c5c3fe4592bdd" alt="Picture of dpcd Picture of dpcd"
| I find that most hunters enter the field way over-scoped. That is how a friend centered a 3 inch sapling ten yards in front of him whilst using a 12X scope on a wild boar at 50 yards. Trees don't show up that close. |
| |
one of us
| I use a 3x9 on mine 90 percent of the time it is on 3X. |
| |
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22e3a/22e3ace9a43ad84fad684b16a1c2d06ac248794e" alt="Picture of drhall762 Picture of drhall762"
| quote: Originally posted by Atkinson: I never felt the muzzle loader shot flat enough for more than a 2.5X..but then I like a 2.5 or 3X on about any modern weapon, at least for deer and elk. Never have I felt the need for more scope in big game hunting.
Have to say +1 to Ray. I scope most all of my hunting rifles with something in the 2.5 to 4 power range. My favorites are the 2.5 power scopes intended for turkey, or so they advertise. Has a small circle in the center of the reticle. Very fast to acquire the target and fire.
Dave
In 100 years who of us will care? An armed society is a polite society! Just because they say you are paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get you.
|
| Posts: 899 | Location: Ammon, NC | Registered: 31 December 2013 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
new member
| Make sure you cover the scope up well with electrical tape or similar before shooting. DAMHIK. |
| |
one of us
| I use a Weaver V3 and it works great for me.
Larry
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
|
| Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfa92/dfa921401241b6cb042689216bfaf10fee64df4d" alt="Picture of Johnp034 Picture of Johnp034"
| With the range of the newer in-lines, powders and projectiles, I would use a good variable power scope, similar to what I would use on a high power rifle. Most newer in-lines are capable of over 200 yd. shots, no problem.
JohnP
|
| Posts: 939 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 09 January 2011 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I've got a couple savage smokeless Muzzle loaders. I run a fixed 6 FX111 on the one and a VX3 3.5-10 on the other. I haven't found the 6 to be any sort of handicap, but granted most of our muzzleloading is done in relatively open country. The variable is usually just left on 6X anyway. |
| Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|