THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SINGLE SHOT RIFLES FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ruger #3 Action
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of 7mmMagnum
posted
Hi guys,
Just after a bit of advice about a #3 Ruger. I know nothing about Ruger Single shots but always been fascinated with them.

I've got the chance to buy a #3 .222 & was wondering if this would be suitable for something like a 7mm Weatherby or 7mm Ultra Mag or something along those lines?

Obviously there's a fair difference between a .222 & either of the 7mm's so what modifications if any would have to be done on the action for the new cartridge?

Thanks.
 
Posts: 152 | Registered: 29 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the action only needs to be rebarreled and a new extractor/ejector for the weatherby. the top of the loading block may have to be lowered for the ultramag to load into the chamber.
 
Posts: 982 | Location: Shenandoah Valley VA | Registered: 05 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 7mmMagnum
posted Hide Post
Thanks Max,

Was talking to my gunsmith today & he said the same thing. Very simple for the Weatherby, not so simple for the RUM.
 
Posts: 152 | Registered: 29 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
You'll need to modify that #3 stock. That steel buttplate will emphasize recoil as will that flat with rounded edges on the comb of the stock. Plan on new wood, but only for those reasons. I had one in .45-70 and it kicked the living daylights out of me.


.395 Family Member
DRSS, po' boy member
Political correctness is nothing but liberal enforced censorship
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
There is nothing wrong with the No. 3 action for what you propose. Although I consider the No. 1 a little more "elegant" due to its' trigger guard and finger lever configuration. However, the factory wood on that carbine is rather difficult to recongfigure into anything nice, especially if the caliber you choose has significant recoil.

TREEBONE Carving makes beautiful replacement wood for the Ruger single shots.


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
Not to hijhack the thread but while on the subject of #3's, what do you reckon a #3 in .375 Winchester is worth?
 
Posts: 4865 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would reitterate that you will find that you want new wood. The #3 stock design, especially with anything with high recoil, makes for a miserable experience. As prof242 said, "kicked the living daylights out of me". He is not overstating.
I have been sitting with a #3 in 45/70 for a number of years. It has a nicely checkered stock and open sights. Shooting it is unpleasant with 300 gn bullets and gets worse as bullet weight goes up.
Recently, I got hold of a #1 stock and am trying to decide what caliber to rebarrel the #3 to. I've got #1's in 6.5x55 and 9.3x74 and have been considering one of the high velocity 7's or .30 calibers.
Definitely factor in a new stock or a caliber with less recoil.
 
Posts: 313 | Location: Alaska to Kalispell MT | Registered: 06 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ditto on the #3 45-70 recoil. Frowner
 
Posts: 116 | Location: Eastport Maine | Registered: 24 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of D99
posted Hide Post
My understanding (I might be wrong) is that the Number 3 didn't function well with non-rimmed cartridges bigger than 222.

I had thought this was a great project action for a 7x65R, 9.3x74R, 348 WCF, 405 WCF, 33 WCF, 10.3x60R, 450/400.

Not so much for what you are thinking.
 
Posts: 4729 | Location: Australia | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I picked up a #3 years ago with a bad 22 Hornet barrel. Stock is functional, if not outroght plain looking, with no marks, cracks, scars.
I finally got around to having it worked on. New barrel installed in 250-3000 AI. All metal finished with Parkerizing. Very subtle. Leopold scope.
First blood last season with a very nice doe at the Air Force Academy.

Ed
 
Posts: 12 | Location: Centennial, CO | Registered: 08 November 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 7mmMagnum:
Hi guys,
Just after a bit of advice about a #3 Ruger. I know nothing about Ruger Single shots but always been fascinated with them.

I've got the chance to buy a #3 .222 & was wondering if this would be suitable for something like a 7mm Weatherby or 7mm Ultra Mag or something along those lines?

Obviously there's a fair difference between a .222 & either of the 7mm's so what modifications if any would have to be done on the action for the new cartridge?

Thanks.
 
Posts: 4 | Location: cypress, texas | Registered: 08 February 2008Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Would suggest keeping rifle stock, fairly rare chambering and fun to shoot
 
Posts: 4 | Location: cypress, texas | Registered: 08 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Is your # 3 a factory 222, if so it's a rare one and it would be smart not to mess with it.
SS

quote:
Originally posted by 7mmMagnum:
Hi guys,
Just after a bit of advice about a #3 Ruger. I know nothing about Ruger Single shots but always been fascinated with them.

I've got the chance to buy a #3 .222 & was wondering if this would be suitable for something like a 7mm Weatherby or 7mm Ultra Mag or something along those lines?

Obviously there's a fair difference between a .222 & either of the 7mm's so what modifications if any would have to be done on the action for the new cartridge?

Thanks.
 
Posts: 30 | Location: Eastern PA | Registered: 30 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
the Number 3 didn't function well with non-rimmed cartridges bigger than 222.


No difference in extraction between #3 and #1. Many people think the #3 won't handle rimless cartridges due to it being chambered mostly in rimmed cartridges. It will work with anything the #1 can use. The extractor has to be the right size for the case head, that's all.

Bruce
 
Posts: 217 | Location: SW WA | Registered: 14 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal30 1906
posted Hide Post
quote:
I had one in .45-70 and it kicked the living daylights out of me.




I have 1 in a .30-40krag and it hurts to shoot sometimes because it hits me in the cheek bone.
I cant imagine a really big or fast caliber
with that stock design.


Cal30




If it cant be Grown it has to be Mined! Devoted member of Newmont mining company Underground Mine rescue team. Carlin East,Deep Star ,Leeville,Deep Post ,Chukar and now Exodus Where next? Pete Bajo to train newbies on long hole stoping and proper blasting techniques.
Back to Exodus mine again learning teaching and operating autonomous loaders in the underground. Bringing everyday life to most individuals 8' at a time!
 
Posts: 3082 | Location: Northern Nevada & Northern Idaho | Registered: 09 April 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia