Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
The only person that needs to be impressed with Grenadiers H&H Hagn, is Grenadier. Im sure he is most content with it. However, If having that amount of money in the bank makes someone else happier than owning a rifle like Grenadiers, then by all means enjoy looking at your bank statement while Grenadier enjoys owning & hunting with his choice of rifle. | |||
|
One of Us |
If that were true, then people "would be falling all over each other trying to acquire" a Champlin action to build a custom rifle on instead of the ubiquitous Mauser action. Fine rifles can be built on the Ruger No.1 but the simple fact is that there are better actions. ~ . | |||
|
One of Us |
Status has nothing to do with it. All one needs do is look closely at a rifle to see the differences between well made and slapped together. And frustration and a waste of money is putting it into a rifle that is poorly made. . | |||
|
One of Us |
It all depends upon exactly what we mean when we say 'better'. Is it smoother-working? more reliable? more accurate? better-looking? safer for the shooter? less costly? more ergonomic? stronger ballistically? stronger through the wrist? easier to stock? more charismatic? easier to find parts? more suitable for the new definition of 'Primitive Weapon'?(grin) more suitable for accuracy competitions? faster to operate and reload? more convenient to carry in the field? These are only a few of the desiderata for a fine custom single shot, and many of the categories rely upon the owner's subjective and very personal preferences. It's fairly obvious that no one action is 'better' than the others in more than a few categories. And it's also fairly obvious that the Ruger is the clear winner in several of the above areas, along with 4-5 more nice single shot actions including some made in the 19th century and IMO NOT including more than a very few made today. It would be interesting to see some of us post our own opinions and FACTS about the winner(s) of each of the above categories, and then let the rest of us snipe at the bold and audacious culprits! Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
One of Us |
I sold those guns for a 50% profit. Will you ever be able to say that about yours? Quick, Cheap, or Good: Pick Two | |||
|
One of Us |
If I owned Grenadier's 300 H&H I sure as hell wouldn't be selling it bub.. | |||
|
One of Us |
Wealthy people often loose money when they go to sell luxury items be it aircraft,boats,...or firearms...even real-estate. You could say they profit from the use,pleasure and appreciation of having such things, not always through the sale of such things when it comes time to change. I dont see the issue with being able to afford a rifle in the class of an H&H Hagn, with which one may hunt with for a very good part of their life. Some people are prepared to suffer a financial loss, rather than save or make money by having and using a different rifle, that gives them little or no satisfaction or pleasure. If anyone cannot afford or does not see value in such higher priced-higher grade items, thats fine,..as your free to form and live by your own value system. | |||
|
One of Us |
Here is a very nice Ruger in 300H&H that was built by Ed Lapour with help as listed below. This is NOT MY RIFLE. Krieger barrel Custom quarter-rib cut for Talley rings NECG banded adjustable height front sight system – soldered on Banded swivel mount – soldered on Custom made shotgun-style safety Custom made steel trigger Custom made action cross screw Custom made trap grip cap to house Talley peep sight Color case by Ballard Rifle Co. Stock work by Al Lind, ACGG: English walnut with ebony tip and ebony diamond inlay at forearm screw hole, 24 LPI checkering Yes, the Number 1 action is good. But I still maintain that it requires some work to bring it up to snuff. . | |||
|
One of Us |
Here is "A custom Hagn actioned .30-06 from the workshop of Steven Dodd Hughes, Gunmaker. Action by Martin Hagn, barrel work by Ralf Martini and engraving by Larry Peters. Test fire groups measure .875” and .600” with custom loaded ammo." This wonderful rifle is from the website of Steven Dodd Hughes. He added a handy peep sight to the front of the action. Very clever. Note: This rifle uses the rolling safety. I prefer the optional British style safety. . | |||
|
One of Us |
Joe, "owner's subjective and very personal preferences" will always win out. Regarding your list, I will mention that the smoothest working single shot falling block rifle I ever had was a Colt Sharps. It used roller bearings in the action. It was a mechanical marvel. As to the remainder of the list, I will allow a portion of an article written by Steven Dodd Hughes to elaborate. The entire article is posted on the Martini website. Here is a portion that describes the Hagn action and compares features of it to a those of some other rifles. I have taken the liberty of adding bold text to highlight a few things.
. | |||
|
One of Us |
Here are a few Hagn action rifles from the Martini website. Remember these actions are available in four different sizes!: Here is a view of my rifle to show a British style safety and a modified, extended tang. Again, this isn't about my rifle. I am only showing this here because it is a good example of the safety option: . | |||
|
One of Us |
Thank you, all. Grenadier, I especially want to thank you for that information, and photos. I hate to say it, but you guys lost me for awhile when some of you started watering fire hydrants. | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks, Grenadier, for the info, especially the description by SDH. BTW the trap grip cap shown on the LaPour Ruger is a standard Talley item, and works perfectly with his splendid little QD peep. There's no doubt in my mind that the Hagn action is much better than the Ruger in several ways, AAMOF it has long been my wish to own a Hagn but my pocketbook is simply too shallow. I do own several custom original-action walls and have come to greatly prefer this action over almost all others. It has most of the desirable features that Steve praises in the Hagn and also has a mechanical FP retractor as well as (a) set trigger(s) if wanted. I own no Rugers and no Dakotas. My single-shot customs are walls, Martini Cadets and Borchardts with an occasional foray into rollers and trapdoors. Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
one of us |
Al Story makes a well regarded 1878 Sharps (Borchardt) that could easily handle cartridges of the class you're thinking about. As mentioned above, Steve Earle makes some nice Wessons; I kind of like the funky looking Mid-Range model. I'm not sure about running them as hot as you want--probably no more than .30-40. Well, I think the Long Range could take a rimmed .257 Roberts. If the .30-40 is enough for you, both Shiloh and C. Sharps make Sharps replicas that can take that class of cartridge. The same goes for the D.Z. Hepburn. I don't know if the breech opening is large enough, but some of these might be able to take a .400 Jeff. I know the CPA Stevens can't, but it will take the .30-40. Ballard Arms was planning to make a Farq, but I don't think they've gotten either their 1885's or their Ballards back in production since the move from Wyoming. Ballards are truly spiffy, but they won't take even a .30-40. Oh, there's many more. It just depends on what you want to spend and what style you like. I'm partial to the circa 1880 designs, as pointed to above. | |||
|
One of Us |
There are good discussions here about the technical merits of the various actions. A good point was made about the barreling, stocking and other embellishments being about the same in all cases, so I was wondering about the cost of the actions themselves, refined either at the factory or aftermarket. I know that a Ruger can be had any day of the week for less than $1000 as a whole gun. Then there is the refinement necessary to get it to a satisfactory level. I know of only one experience of that process, and it ran about $200 ten years ago. I have a friend who bought a Dakota Model 10 action alone some years ago and built a 9.3X74R on it, so I know that Dakota at least used to sell bare actions. Can someone who knows fill us in on the current costs to acquire the actions discussed here, including the Hagn, Dakota and other? Quick, Cheap, or Good: Pick Two | |||
|
One of Us |
end of this month i am getting custm made single shot from germany FIRMA ADAMY GEBRUDER,its 7x65R,I have few photos already but not sure how to post | |||
|
One of Us |
I also would be interested in this info. It's VERY difficult for me to envision that the cost to bring a Ruger up to par would come ANYWHERE CLOSE to the cost of a Dakota or Hagn action alone, MUCH LESS when you add the cost of bringing the Hagn or Dakota up to par! And please don't be so silly as to imply that the Hagns and Dakotas don't need refinement! Actually we probably DO need to discuss refining these high-end actions, in order to clarify some issues..... Hagn: non-adjustable trigger with built-in creep (per SDH's article), rolling safety, may need change in grip/wrist relationships and changes to receiver ring shape. Dakota: ugly cheap-looking lever, unreliable firing pin, shallow upper tang line and possibly others, I've not disassembled one yet so...maybe safety or trigger issues as well. Ruger: wavy sides, needs trigger/safety work, needs better-feeling lever retention, receiver ring logo, forearm hanger is awkward, noisy operation. Steve Earle Wesson: maybe trigger work maybe not. Hard for some smiths to stock. Ballard High Wall: MAY be available now but has history of broken firing pins, hard to stock and bad tang angle, ugly finger-punishing lever. Browning or Winchester 1885 High Wall: SERIOUS dis/reassembly issues, needs trigger work, ugly finger-punishing lever. Please understand that these are not attacks or flames on any of these actions, merely my own opinion of some of the changes that I personally would make to each. Actually there are 2 here that I personally would not choose to use at all but that's immaterial to our discussion. How about some discussion and/or feedback? Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
one of us |
I thought the Ballard Arms 1885's were near copies of the originals. Do all 1885s suffer these flaws? I've never owned one. Perhaps all the old guns suffer from "bad tang angle" since they were set more for open and tang sights, but that's all I shoot so maybe I'm blissfully ignorant. The "broken firing pins" surprises me. The drawings suggest it's pretty much straight line. Do they break on firing or when camming out? Karl | |||
|
One of Us |
Karl, the Ballard High Walls are very faithful copies of the originals and so of course IMO all the originals share those faults. The modern clone High Walls' rep for broken FPs is IMO largely a function of the new FPs being heat-treated too hard, along with improper timing. There are several solutions for this if it's a problem with any particular individual rifle. The straight-line design is indeed A Very Good Thing and my second=design wall FP repair is now more than 40 years old and still going strong. On the first one I followed Frank de Haas' procedure and then had to go back for the second try but that's another story. IMO there is no such thing as a perfect rifle action of any type, I guess that's why I've been building customs since I was 14, I just wasn't satisfied knowing it could be just a little bit better. My favorites include the Winchester Walls, the Martini Cadets and the 1878 Sharps Borchardts. Aside from the Cadet's obvious size limitations, all 3 are plenty strong and fully as reliable as any modern action (and MORE reliable than some!). In addition, the Cadets and Borchardts are fully as accurate as any modern action up to but maybe not including the Miller/deHaas and possibly the new Farrow. I haven't addressed the new Soroka since I've never even held one, much less disassembled one. Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
one of us |
Joe, with the Borchardt, how difficult is it to get the cocking pin to rest exactly at the top of the cocking ramp on the cocking plates? I've wondered if even with the cocking pin resting exactly on the ramp, if the firing pin retracts smartly enough to avoid putting some bending load on the pin as the breech falls. In other words: does a properly fitted Borchardt never break a firing pin? I've also wondered if with the wonders of modern CNC and EDM one could make a Borchardt with no cocking plates, relying on modern machinery to mill the cocking ramps directly into the inside of the breech mortise. Borchardt's patent drawings imagined it would be possible to do so. It would clean up the outside of the action to remove all those screws for the cocking plates. Also, you mentioned "possibly the new Farrow." Who's making that one? I haven't heard of it. Karl | |||
|
One of Us |
Karl, I've owned 10 original Borchardts over the years and smithed more than half of them. Actually the smithing consisted largely of correcting previous smiths' mistakes and outright FUBARs (grin). The Borchardt has had more misinformation published about it than any other action of which I'm aware and apparently many of the old-time smiths believed some of the BS, go figure! Yes, I was able to achieve instant retraction movement of the striker by first achieving full contact of the retractor pin against the side-plates' cam bottoms. Very slow and careful lathe work on the front of the striker with frequent stops to try the fit was the key here. I also converted the striker nose to the same-type 'top-hat' configuration that I use in Win wall actions, as an added precaution against breakage. Must work OK since I did the first one almost 20 years ago... I set pin nose protrusion at 0.030"-0.040" with a diameter of 1/16"-5/64" on the various Borchardts I smithed and have had no problems at all. The new Farrow is supposedly a creation of Dakota and I'm unsure of the production status. Supposedly it's a stainless-steel modern version of the original Farrow with various accuracy improvements such as drawbolt, coil springs, etc but I've never seen one in person. The original Farrow was an extreme gamesman's lightweight-action target rifle made specifically for offhand target shooting, and apparently the new Farrow is also somewhat of a gamesman's action, intended for the BPCRS and Long Range BP competitions. I've owned only one of the originals, a 38-55 with Swiss butt and folding palm rest, and it was a joy to handle. Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
one of us |
Joe, I'll let my ignorance show. Could you further describe the "top-hat" firing pin you mentioned? Karl | |||
|
One of Us |
Here's an example of a 'top hat' on a Winchester wall firing pin repair. The top hat is the intermediate piece. The 'brim' of the top hat isn't very apparent in the photo but it's a small ledge that projects beyond the bored-out firing pin body when the top hat is inserted, ready to receive the new firing pin shaft shown. The parts are held together with Loctite, Black Max, epoxy or other adhesive. I sometimes have furnished spare pre-fitted top hats and firing pin inserts for folks who shoot in competition, so that in an emergency they could heat the problem parts with a cigarette lighter to release the adhesive so that they could do a field repair with the spare parts. None has ever been needed yet though, at least none of mine. Apparently the slight cushioning action of the adhesive serves to dampen any destructive vibrations, or something. Back in 1970 when I did my first wall FP repair, I used the de Haas method of drilling a hole in the old firing pin body and inserting a new FP nose shaft. All went well for the first few shots and then the too-hard shaft broke. Had to drill the FP body out from the rear in order to poke the broken shaft out the front, and then I had a honkin' big HOLE staring me in the face from the rear of the FP body! I could have D&Ted the FP body to install a plug screw but decided to fab an intermediate piece instead, to obviate any remote possibility that a future pierced primer could blow the new FP shaft and plug screw out into my eye. The first one looked kinda like a top hat so..... Having an intermediate top hat piece allows a broken FP nose to be easily withdrawn when removing the top hat, and a replacement top hat with replacement FP nose can be tucked into the shooter's ditty bag for mental reassurance. I'm using a trap-door grip cap to contain a spare entire FP on my latest project low wall but am fairly sure that it'll never be needed, just a little extra custom touch for a special rifle. Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
One of Us |
DRSS NRA life AK Master Guide 124 | |||
|
one of us |
Interesting fix, Joe; thanks for taking the time to describe it. Karl | |||
|
One of Us |
Grenadier's rifle is a true gem however I have doubts if the lever of the Hagn can be handled properly. To me the lever is not as grippy as Ruger or Farqarthson especially if you hurry to reload. CZ | |||
|
One of Us |
take a look at www.steveeraleproducts.com before you committ to an action. He is now building a Fraser, to go along with the Frank Wesson #1 Long Range action(that so closely resembles a Farqy). Something different in a chambering? 280 DuBiel. | |||
|
One of Us |
Well it is http://www.steveearleproducts.com/ and why not to chamber it for 333 Flanged? CZ | |||
|
One of Us |
The Weeson is more like an Alex Henry than a Farq. That Fraser would be the way to go IMO although that would account for a large portion of the budget. Not just the cost of the action, but then final finishing and the stocking. At least with a No.1, you could get an excellent stock from Luxus for much less than the stocking of the Fraser. For that matter, the Luxus Model 11 may be a good option for you to look into. | |||
|
One of Us |
As to caliber: what better all around hunting cartridge, even legal for African Big Five; than the 9,3x74R. I shoot a 38-90 in one of my SS rifles, the germans necked it down .016" to create the 9,3x74. Single Shot rifles are an illogical response to wanting a hunting rifle. Bolts are better, faster, and chambered for some very high intensity rounds. The SS is simply an object of beauty in a plain version, and begs for WoW! Walnut and engraved and inlaid decoration on the action. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia