THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SINGLE SHOT RIFLES FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Single Shot Rifles    Seeking advice on building a great single shot
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Seeking advice on building a great single shot
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Vol717:
It must be frustrating that no one is sufficiently impressed at how much you wasted on that status symbol.


The only person that needs to be impressed with Grenadiers H&H Hagn, is Grenadier. Im sure he is most content with it.
However, If having that amount of money in the bank makes someone else happier than owning a rifle like Grenadiers,
then by all means enjoy looking at your bank statement while Grenadier enjoys owning & hunting with his choice of rifle.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jerry Liles:
The Ruger is a handsome rifle. While it has its problems good looks and reliability aren't. If only 2 or 3,000 had been made we would be falling all over each other trying to acquire one and bragging about what a wonderful rifle it is.
If that were true, then people "would be falling all over each other trying to acquire" a Champlin action to build a custom rifle on instead of the ubiquitous Mauser action.

Fine rifles can be built on the Ruger No.1 but the simple fact is that there are better actions.

~




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Vol717:
It must be frustrating that no one is sufficiently impressed at how much you wasted on that status symbol.
Status has nothing to do with it. All one needs do is look closely at a rifle to see the differences between well made and slapped together. And frustration and a waste of money is putting it into a rifle that is poorly made.




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It all depends upon exactly what we mean when we say 'better'. Is it

smoother-working?
more reliable?
more accurate?
better-looking?
safer for the shooter?
less costly?
more ergonomic?
stronger ballistically?
stronger through the wrist?
easier to stock?
more charismatic?
easier to find parts?
more suitable for the new definition of 'Primitive Weapon'?(grin)
more suitable for accuracy competitions?
faster to operate and reload?
more convenient to carry in the field?

These are only a few of the desiderata for a fine custom single shot, and many of the categories rely upon the owner's subjective and very personal preferences. It's fairly obvious that no one action is 'better' than the others in more than a few categories.

And it's also fairly obvious that the Ruger is the clear winner in several of the above areas, along with 4-5 more nice single shot actions including some made in the 19th century and IMO NOT including more than a very few made today.

It would be interesting to see some of us post our own opinions and FACTS about the winner(s) of each of the above categories, and then let the rest of us snipe at the bold and audacious culprits!
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I sold those guns for a 50% profit. Will you ever be able to say that about yours?


Quick, Cheap, or Good: Pick Two
 
Posts: 2176 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 18 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Vol717:
I sold those guns for a 50% profit. Will you ever be able to say that about yours?

If I owned Grenadier's 300 H&H I sure as hell wouldn't be selling it bub..





 
Posts: 592 | Registered: 28 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Wealthy people often loose money when they go to sell luxury items be it aircraft,boats,...or firearms...even real-estate.
You could say they profit from the use,pleasure and appreciation of having such things, not always through the sale of such things when it comes time to change.

I dont see the issue with being able to afford a rifle in the class of an H&H Hagn, with which one may hunt with for a very good part of their life.
Some people are prepared to suffer a financial loss, rather than save or make money by having and using a different rifle, that gives them little or no satisfaction or pleasure.

If anyone cannot afford or does not see value in such higher priced-higher grade items, thats fine,..as your free to form and live by your own value system.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
Here is a very nice Ruger in 300H&H that was built by Ed Lapour with help as listed below. This is NOT MY RIFLE.

Krieger barrel
Custom quarter-rib cut for Talley rings
NECG banded adjustable height front sight system – soldered on
Banded swivel mount – soldered on
Custom made shotgun-style safety
Custom made steel trigger
Custom made action cross screw

Custom made trap grip cap to house Talley peep sight
Color case by Ballard Rifle Co.
Stock work by Al Lind, ACGG: English walnut with ebony tip and ebony diamond inlay at forearm screw hole, 24 LPI checkering

Yes, the Number 1 action is good. But I still maintain that it requires some work to bring it up to snuff.








.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
Here is "A custom Hagn actioned .30-06 from the workshop of Steven Dodd Hughes, Gunmaker. Action by Martin Hagn, barrel work by Ralf Martini and engraving by Larry Peters. Test fire groups measure .875” and .600” with custom loaded ammo."

This wonderful rifle is from the website of Steven Dodd Hughes. He added a handy peep sight to the front of the action. Very clever.

Note: This rifle uses the rolling safety. I prefer the optional British style safety.







.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by J.D.Steele:
It all depends upon exactly what we mean when we say 'better'. Is it

smoother-working?
more reliable?
more accurate?
better-looking?
safer for the shooter?
less costly?
more ergonomic?
stronger ballistically?
stronger through the wrist?
easier to stock?
more charismatic?
easier to find parts?
more suitable for the new definition of 'Primitive Weapon'?(grin)
more suitable for accuracy competitions?
faster to operate and reload?
more convenient to carry in the field?

These are only a few of the desiderata for a fine custom single shot, and many of the categories rely upon the owner's subjective and very personal preferences. It's fairly obvious that no one action is 'better' than the others in more than a few categories.

And it's also fairly obvious that the Ruger is the clear winner in several of the above areas, along with 4-5 more nice single shot actions including some made in the 19th century and IMO NOT including more than a very few made today.

It would be interesting to see some of us post our own opinions and FACTS about the winner(s) of each of the above categories, and then let the rest of us snipe at the bold and audacious culprits!
Regards, Joe

Joe, "owner's subjective and very personal preferences" will always win out.

Regarding your list, I will mention that the smoothest working single shot falling block rifle I ever had was a Colt Sharps. It used roller bearings in the action. It was a mechanical marvel.

As to the remainder of the list, I will allow a portion of an article written by Steven Dodd Hughes to elaborate. The entire article is posted on the Martini website. Here is a portion that describes the Hagn action and compares features of it to a those of some other rifles. I have taken the liberty of adding bold text to highlight a few things.

quote:
From - http://www.martiniandhagngunma...om/technicalinfo.htm

... In fact, all of the internal parts are closely hand fitted and the externals receive a generous amount of hand polishing. And if you've a mind to do some external shaping beyond the norm, the actions can be had in a rougher exterior form to test your own hand filing.

All of the internal parts are held together with precision dowel pins in perfectly reamed holes either concealed and captured by the stock, or by other action parts. Nothing can work or shoot loose. For the most part, these pins can be easily pushed out by hand with a punch.

The action is comprised of 34 total parts. It is powered by five coil springs: mainspring, trigger spring, extractor spring, safety spring and firing pin spring. The mainspring and its assembly are the most singular features of the mechanism.

Riding on the internal shaft of the sear, the mainspring is enclosed in the mainspring housing, and when assembled is under some tension at all times. The sear has three separate functions: the rear is wedge shaped to locate in a V notch in the rear of the tangs, the sear shaft holds and guides the mainspring, and the front of the sear is cutaway to engage the trigger and provide the true sear surface. The mainspring housing slips over the mainspring and sear shaft, has a cylindrical front end fitting in a concave surface in the back of the hammer, and is slotted through the center for the trigger.

The mainspring assembly works very much like a three position toggle switch. As the lever is lowered, the mainspring drops and is partially compressed while the wedge end of the sear pivots downward in the V notch. As the lever is raised, the mainspring is caught by the sear engaging the trigger, and as the lever is fully closed the mainspring is fully compressed. One can feel the resistance as the lever is shut, cocking the action. Because the hammer is pinned to the lever and is joined to the breech block by the link, mainspring tension also holds the lever fully open or closed. There is no need of a catch to lock the lever shut.

The lever throw is a mere 40°, shorter in angle and travel than any other single shot I am familiar with. The Dakota #10 has a full extended operating lever angle of 50°, the Ruger 55° and the original Winchester High Wall a whopping 105°. I have hunted with, or extensively shot both of these others and can say that regardless of the angle, the Hagn simply feels like it has a shorter throw. I'm quite sure this is because of the mainspring tension on the lever. Closing the Dakota, one has to squeeze the lever fully closed. The Ruger has a latch on the #1 and a detent on the #3 that must be physically secured. While the High Wall's lever is held shut by mainspring tension, in all of its long travel, it is only in the last 1/8" that one feels the spring assist.

In contrast, after initial resistance at full cock, the Hagn seems to shut itself; the last bit of travel is noticeably assisted by the mainspring. As one who has hunted almost exclusively with single shots for many years, I can assure you this positive movement into battery position is reassuring when reloading after one has made a shot on a game animal.

The extractor, if not unique, is uncomplicated, positive in function and delivers the great mechanical advantage of the leverage principal of the operating lever. I say if not unique, because the Dakota and Browning 1885 have used this design.

The extractor is centrally mounted in the front extension of the lever and rotates in a semicircular motion in a 5/8" deep slot in the rear of the barrel chamber. As the lever moves forward and down, the extractor moves upward and to the rear, snagging the cartridge rim pushing it out of the chamber. Because of my anachronistic tendencies, I'm a big believer in rimmed cartridges for single shot actions for positive extraction. Fact is, the Hagn actually might work better with rimless cartridges, for both loading and unloading. A rimmed cartridge has the possibility of hanging up on the breech block or barrel breech while a rimless will slide right in or out.

In contrast, with the nine o'clock location and right angle extension of the extractor in the breech of the High Wall or Ruger, much of the levering advantage is lost. These extractors also have more friction of parts moving against other parts. The Hagn extractor doesn't contact anything but the lever and cartridge case.

Looking down at the Hagn action with the block lowered, the extractor is in a fully rearward position. Also shown are the barrel/breech witness mark, the stock mortices in the back of the action, the rotary safety wheel and the author's thumb print.

Again, from the orientation of a single shot rifle hunter, extraction is paramount. A few years back I wounded an antelope with the first shot and the cartridge case stuck in the breech of my beloved Ruger sidelever conversion. Believe me, I was frantically pushing on the lever, getting ready to hammer the lever with my knife and remembering the bore rod back at the truck, while the pronghorn rolled around on the ground with his back broken. Fortunately the case came out and I administered the coupe de grace. I 've always known the sidelever adds charm and uniqueness, but know from experience it detracts from positive extraction.

This advantageous leverage also work when loading. Some single shots, sidelevers and rolling blocks particularly, don't have the leverage to fully seat a minutely oversize case in a tight chamber. I can't imagine this being the same sort of problem with the Hagn.

The hammer is centrally positioned and hidden in the rear of the breech block. It rotates on a pin in the top middle of the lever. The link also rides on this pin. The hammer has a very short throw and strikes the firing pin which is in-line with the center of the bore. Note that the hammer is 90° above its pivot point when fired and that the mainspring housing is directly behind the firing pin. All is in-line at the moment of detonation. This feature also hold tremendous pressure on the firing pin in its hole so there is no possibility of the primer backing, or flowing into the pin hole.

Many early British single shots, such as the Farquharson, have angled firing pins. Other actions have a Z shaped pin that the hammer strikes above or below the bore line, such as the Dakota and the Sharps side hammer. Both types have a reputation for being fragile. Regardless of other considerations, I believe an in-line firing pin offers the most consistent and positive ignition for fine accuracy.

The tip of the Hagn's firing pin is small at .060" in diameter with about .040" protrusion. Although small, it is not fragile because of other factors that negate this concern.

The firing pin sits in a hardened bushing recessed into the face of the breech block which is retained by a cross pin. This bushing protrudes about .005" from the face of the block so the cartridge head seats on the bushing rather than the block. The firing pin has a coil spring over its front end for retraction.

The first movement lowering the lever lowers the link and starts retracting the hammer before the breech block starts to drop. This allows the spring loaded firing pin to disengage the primer before the breech block movement could shear it off. The pin is hardened and tempered to prevent mushrooming from hammer blows and to lessen the possibility of tip breakage. Because the firing pin is short, precisely fit and has such little movement, you can dry fire this action all day without worry of breakage.

The breech block is milled from a solid billet of steel and weighed nearly half a pound on my inaccurate and out of date postal scale. Underneath, a deep recess is milled in the rear for the hammer. The top front face is angled and slightly coved to facilitate final chambering of a cartridge. The block fits the mortise more precisely than any other single shot I've examined. It moves freely up and down with just a few thousandths of play.

The breech block is connected to the lever via the link and link pin. The link pin and hammer pins are concealed and captured in the breech block until the lever is removed. The lock-up of the block is simple, strong and unique. As the lever moves the breech block upward, an angular section on the top of the lever pushes the block up. Just as the breech block stops, the lever cams over to lock the block between its stop and the top of the lever contacting the link pin.

The camming affect and the mainspring tension holding the action shut combine to make an extraordinarily secure lock-up. The massive surface area of the rear breech block rails contacting the mortise gives this action the strength to handle magnum cartridges.

The trigger is quite simple as well. Its shoe is nicely shaped and large enough for a positive feel. A small coil spring holds the trigger tensioned to engage the sear. As mentioned, this engagement is located where the trigger projects through the mainspring housing. The long upper end of the trigger is captured by the safety when it is snapped on.

Measuring the trigger pull with a Lyman digital gauge, it averaged 3 lbs. 4 oz. for ten tests. Being an old hand at trigger jobs for guns, rifle and revolvers, I did notice a bit of creep. Measuring the trigger movement with calipers between the trigger and lever I came up with just .040". Minimal for sure and I consider this an excellent trigger for a hunting rifle.

The trigger has no adjustments, and in my opinion, doesn't need them. With an excellent pull-weight, little creep and virtually no over-travel, I'm very pleased with it just as it is.

The safety is entirely unique. A circular rotary-action wheel protrudes from the top tang, just where it ought to be. When the action is cocked, the thumb rotates it rearward less than a quarter turn to engage. This drops the safety hook over the trigger firmly locking it and blocking the hammer at the same time. Again, my archaic sensibilities would prefer a sliding safety, and that can be had as an option. In truth, if I were building a hunting rifle for myself, I would order the rotating safety because it is virtually impossible to accidentally disengage. It is very positive and very safe. A set trigger is also optionally available, but I haven't seen one. Knowing Martin Hagn, I'm sure it is superb.

Perhaps the most amazing aspect of the Hagn action is that so few parts do so much. All of the moving parts are precisely fit and well polished and the action operates with authority. When the lever snaps home into battery, it is all strength and rigidity as if the mechanism has confidence in itself.




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
Here are a few Hagn action rifles from the Martini website. Remember these actions are available in four different sizes!:



Here is a view of my rifle to show a British style safety and a modified, extended tang. Again, this isn't about my rifle. I am only showing this here because it is a good example of the safety option:




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DLS
posted Hide Post
Thank you, all. Grenadier, I especially want to thank you for that information, and photos.

I hate to say it, but you guys lost me for awhile when some of you started watering fire hydrants.
 
Posts: 3934 | Location: California | Registered: 01 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks, Grenadier, for the info, especially the description by SDH.

BTW the trap grip cap shown on the LaPour Ruger is a standard Talley item, and works perfectly with his splendid little QD peep.

There's no doubt in my mind that the Hagn action is much better than the Ruger in several ways, AAMOF it has long been my wish to own a Hagn but my pocketbook is simply too shallow.

I do own several custom original-action walls and have come to greatly prefer this action over almost all others. It has most of the desirable features that Steve praises in the Hagn and also has a mechanical FP retractor as well as (a) set trigger(s) if wanted.

I own no Rugers and no Dakotas. My single-shot customs are walls, Martini Cadets and Borchardts with an occasional foray into rollers and trapdoors.
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
Al Story makes a well regarded 1878 Sharps (Borchardt) that could easily handle cartridges of the class you're thinking about.

As mentioned above, Steve Earle makes some nice Wessons; I kind of like the funky looking Mid-Range model. I'm not sure about running them as hot as you want--probably no more than .30-40. Well, I think the Long Range could take a rimmed .257 Roberts.

If the .30-40 is enough for you, both Shiloh and C. Sharps make Sharps replicas that can take that class of cartridge. The same goes for the D.Z. Hepburn. I don't know if the breech opening is large enough, but some of these might be able to take a .400 Jeff. I know the CPA Stevens can't, but it will take the .30-40.

Ballard Arms was planning to make a Farq, but I don't think they've gotten either their 1885's or their Ballards back in production since the move from Wyoming. Ballards are truly spiffy, but they won't take even a .30-40.

Oh, there's many more. It just depends on what you want to spend and what style you like. I'm partial to the circa 1880 designs, as pointed to above.
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There are good discussions here about the technical merits of the various actions. A good point was made about the barreling, stocking and other embellishments being about the same in all cases, so I was wondering about the cost of the actions themselves, refined either at the factory or aftermarket. I know that a Ruger can be had any day of the week for less than $1000 as a whole gun. Then there is the refinement necessary to get it to a satisfactory level. I know of only one experience of that process, and it ran about $200 ten years ago. I have a friend who bought a Dakota Model 10 action alone some years ago and built a 9.3X74R on it, so I know that Dakota at least used to sell bare actions. Can someone who knows fill us in on the current costs to acquire the actions discussed here, including the Hagn, Dakota and other?


Quick, Cheap, or Good: Pick Two
 
Posts: 2176 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 18 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
end of this month i am getting custm made single shot from germany FIRMA ADAMY GEBRUDER,its 7x65R,I have few photos already but not sure how to post
 
Posts: 139 | Location: Canada | Registered: 08 May 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Vol717:
There are good discussions here about the technical merits of the various actions. A good point was made about the barreling, stocking and other embellishments being about the same in all cases, so I was wondering about the cost of the actions themselves, refined either at the factory or aftermarket. I know that a Ruger can be had any day of the week for less than $1000 as a whole gun. Then there is the refinement necessary to get it to a satisfactory level. I know of only one experience of that process, and it ran about $200 ten years ago. I have a friend who bought a Dakota Model 10 action alone some years ago and built a 9.3X74R on it, so I know that Dakota at least used to sell bare actions. Can someone who knows fill us in on the current costs to acquire the actions discussed here, including the Hagn, Dakota and other?
I also would be interested in this info.

It's VERY difficult for me to envision that the cost to bring a Ruger up to par would come ANYWHERE CLOSE to the cost of a Dakota or Hagn action alone, MUCH LESS when you add the cost of bringing the Hagn or Dakota up to par!

And please don't be so silly as to imply that the Hagns and Dakotas don't need refinement!

Actually we probably DO need to discuss refining these high-end actions, in order to clarify some issues.....

Hagn: non-adjustable trigger with built-in creep (per SDH's article), rolling safety, may need change in grip/wrist relationships and changes to receiver ring shape.

Dakota: ugly cheap-looking lever, unreliable firing pin, shallow upper tang line and possibly others, I've not disassembled one yet so...maybe safety or trigger issues as well.

Ruger: wavy sides, needs trigger/safety work, needs better-feeling lever retention, receiver ring logo, forearm hanger is awkward, noisy operation.

Steve Earle Wesson: maybe trigger work maybe not. Hard for some smiths to stock.

Ballard High Wall: MAY be available now but has history of broken firing pins, hard to stock and bad tang angle, ugly finger-punishing lever.

Browning or Winchester 1885 High Wall: SERIOUS dis/reassembly issues, needs trigger work, ugly finger-punishing lever.

Please understand that these are not attacks or flames on any of these actions, merely my own opinion of some of the changes that I personally would make to each. Actually there are 2 here that I personally would not choose to use at all but that's immaterial to our discussion.

How about some discussion and/or feedback?
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
quote:
Ballard High Wall: MAY be available now but has history of broken firing pins, hard to stock and bad tang angle, ugly finger-punishing lever.


I thought the Ballard Arms 1885's were near copies of the originals. Do all 1885s suffer these flaws? I've never owned one.

Perhaps all the old guns suffer from "bad tang angle" since they were set more for open and tang sights, but that's all I shoot so maybe I'm blissfully ignorant.

The "broken firing pins" surprises me. The drawings suggest it's pretty much straight line. Do they break on firing or when camming out?

Karl
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Karl, the Ballard High Walls are very faithful copies of the originals and so of course IMO all the originals share those faults. The modern clone High Walls' rep for broken FPs is IMO largely a function of the new FPs being heat-treated too hard, along with improper timing. There are several solutions for this if it's a problem with any particular individual rifle.

The straight-line design is indeed A Very Good Thing and my second=design wall FP repair is now more than 40 years old and still going strong. On the first one I followed Frank de Haas' procedure and then had to go back for the second try but that's another story.

IMO there is no such thing as a perfect rifle action of any type, I guess that's why I've been building customs since I was 14, I just wasn't satisfied knowing it could be just a little bit better.

My favorites include the Winchester Walls, the Martini Cadets and the 1878 Sharps Borchardts. Aside from the Cadet's obvious size limitations, all 3 are plenty strong and fully as reliable as any modern action (and MORE reliable than some!). In addition, the Cadets and Borchardts are fully as accurate as any modern action up to but maybe not including the Miller/deHaas and possibly the new Farrow.

I haven't addressed the new Soroka since I've never even held one, much less disassembled one.
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
Joe, with the Borchardt, how difficult is it to get the cocking pin to rest exactly at the top of the cocking ramp on the cocking plates? I've wondered if even with the cocking pin resting exactly on the ramp, if the firing pin retracts smartly enough to avoid putting some bending load on the pin as the breech falls. In other words: does a properly fitted Borchardt never break a firing pin?

I've also wondered if with the wonders of modern CNC and EDM one could make a Borchardt with no cocking plates, relying on modern machinery to mill the cocking ramps directly into the inside of the breech mortise. Borchardt's patent drawings imagined it would be possible to do so. It would clean up the outside of the action to remove all those screws for the cocking plates.

Also, you mentioned "possibly the new Farrow." Who's making that one? I haven't heard of it.

Karl
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Karl, I've owned 10 original Borchardts over the years and smithed more than half of them. Actually the smithing consisted largely of correcting previous smiths' mistakes and outright FUBARs (grin). The Borchardt has had more misinformation published about it than any other action of which I'm aware and apparently many of the old-time smiths believed some of the BS, go figure!

Yes, I was able to achieve instant retraction movement of the striker by first achieving full contact of the retractor pin against the side-plates' cam bottoms. Very slow and careful lathe work on the front of the striker with frequent stops to try the fit was the key here.

I also converted the striker nose to the same-type 'top-hat' configuration that I use in Win wall actions, as an added precaution against breakage. Must work OK since I did the first one almost 20 years ago...

I set pin nose protrusion at 0.030"-0.040" with a diameter of 1/16"-5/64" on the various Borchardts I smithed and have had no problems at all.

The new Farrow is supposedly a creation of Dakota and I'm unsure of the production status. Supposedly it's a stainless-steel modern version of the original Farrow with various accuracy improvements such as drawbolt, coil springs, etc but I've never seen one in person.

The original Farrow was an extreme gamesman's lightweight-action target rifle made specifically for offhand target shooting, and apparently the new Farrow is also somewhat of a gamesman's action, intended for the BPCRS and Long Range BP competitions.

I've owned only one of the originals, a 38-55 with Swiss butt and folding palm rest, and it was a joy to handle.
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
Joe, I'll let my ignorance show. Could you further describe the "top-hat" firing pin you mentioned? Karl
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here's an example of a 'top hat' on a Winchester wall firing pin repair. The top hat is the intermediate piece.

The 'brim' of the top hat isn't very apparent in the photo but it's a small ledge that projects beyond the bored-out firing pin body when the top hat is inserted, ready to receive the new firing pin shaft shown. The parts are held together with Loctite, Black Max, epoxy or other adhesive.

I sometimes have furnished spare pre-fitted top hats and firing pin inserts for folks who shoot in competition, so that in an emergency they could heat the problem parts with a cigarette lighter to release the adhesive so that they could do a field repair with the spare parts.

None has ever been needed yet though, at least none of mine. Apparently the slight cushioning action of the adhesive serves to dampen any destructive vibrations, or something.

Back in 1970 when I did my first wall FP repair, I used the de Haas method of drilling a hole in the old firing pin body and inserting a new FP nose shaft. All went well for the first few shots and then the too-hard shaft broke. Had to drill the FP body out from the rear in order to poke the broken shaft out the front, and then I had a honkin' big HOLE staring me in the face from the rear of the FP body!

I could have D&Ted the FP body to install a plug screw but decided to fab an intermediate piece instead, to obviate any remote possibility that a future pierced primer could blow the new FP shaft and plug screw out into my eye. The first one looked kinda like a top hat so.....

Having an intermediate top hat piece allows a broken FP nose to be easily withdrawn when removing the top hat, and a replacement top hat with replacement FP nose can be tucked into the shooter's ditty bag for mental reassurance. I'm using a trap-door grip cap to contain a spare entire FP on my latest project low wall but am fairly sure that it'll never be needed, just a little extra custom touch for a special rifle.
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Akshooter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TEUTONIC:
end of this month i am getting custm made single shot from germany FIRMA ADAMY GEBRUDER,its 7x65R,I have few photos already but not sure how to post


DRSS
NRA life
AK Master Guide 124
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 05 February 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
quote:
Here's an example of a 'top hat' on a Winchester wall firing pin repair.


Interesting fix, Joe; thanks for taking the time to describe it. Karl
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Grenadier's rifle is a true gem however I have doubts if the lever of the Hagn can be handled properly. To me the lever is not as grippy as Ruger or Farqarthson especially if you hurry to reload.

CZ
 
Posts: 208 | Location: Prague, Czech Republic | Registered: 28 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
take a look at www.steveeraleproducts.com before you committ to an action.

He is now building a Fraser, to go along with the Frank Wesson #1 Long Range action(that so closely resembles a Farqy).

Something different in a chambering? 280 DuBiel.
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
take a look at www.steveeraleproducts.com before you committ to an action.

He is now building a Fraser, to go along with the Frank Wesson #1 Long Range action(that so closely resembles a Farqy).

Something different in a chambering? 280 DuBiel.


Well it is http://www.steveearleproducts.com/ and why not to chamber it for 333 Flanged?
Cool

CZ
 
Posts: 208 | Location: Prague, Czech Republic | Registered: 28 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
quote:


He is now building a Fraser, to go along with the Frank Wesson #1 Long Range action(that so closely resembles a Farqy).


The Weeson is more like an Alex Henry than a Farq.
That Fraser would be the way to go IMO although that would account for a large portion of the budget.
Not just the cost of the action, but then final finishing and the stocking.
At least with a No.1, you could get an excellent stock from Luxus for much less than the stocking of the Fraser.
For that matter, the Luxus Model 11 may be a good option for you to look into.
 
Posts: 3368 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
As to caliber: what better all around hunting cartridge, even legal for African Big Five; than the 9,3x74R. I shoot a 38-90 in one of my SS rifles, the germans necked it down .016" to create the 9,3x74.

Single Shot rifles are an illogical response to wanting a hunting rifle. Bolts are better, faster, and chambered for some very high intensity rounds.

The SS is simply an object of beauty in a plain version, and begs for WoW! Walnut and engraved and inlaid decoration on the action.
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Single Shot Rifles    Seeking advice on building a great single shot

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia