I find that scout concept on the # 1 fascinating as I for one designed it + sent the shop drawings to Ruger's S+D dept several years ago along with my "poor man's patent" which I still have in the safe post-dated + unopened. Oh well, anyone that comes up with an idea has others that might think the same. My idea + shop drawings were sent to Ruger. It is a great concept + also applies to the 375,416, + 458.
Ive never seen any pluses to the scout concept! I would think a 2,3, or even the 1X Weaver in standard scope posture offers more pluses..All my #1 are standard in Ruger rings, and never a problem...and Im a fan of the receiver or peep sight as well in the bigger bores. Just a different poin of view. so what say you admirers of the Scout concept, tell me about it..
I like receiver sights and have them on quite a few rifles. My Ruger #1 tropicals have the Leupold scout scopes, 2.5x . The advantage for me is with the recoil I do not worry about the scope cutting me, and the magnification is low enough I can shoot it with both eyes open, very fast, faster than peep sights.
JJK
Posts: 299 | Location: E. Texas, NE Louisiana | Registered: 10 September 2006
I can imagine that the clear loading option on a DG rifle is of benifit in a tight situation, so that might be a plus?? I just have never used one and the idea never appealed to me, maybe I should give it a try before I bark!!
Originally posted by jkingrph: I like receiver sights and have them on quite a few rifles. My Ruger #1 tropicals have the Leupold scout scopes, 2.5x . The advantage for me is with the recoil I do not worry about the scope cutting me, and the magnification is low enough I can shoot it with both eyes open, very fast, faster than peep sights.
I am curious about this approach. When you do this set up, is the eye relief about right for a scout scope? I’d like to see a picture if you have one. If you’re unable to post it, please send it to me and I will do so. Thanks
Posts: 1033 | Location: Central California Coast | Registered: 05 May 2007