THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SINGLE SHOT RIFLES FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Single Shot Rifles    Break open single shot rifle vs Ruger No.1

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Break open single shot rifle vs Ruger No.1
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Today’s hunting perspective?
Would you prefer the No.1 over the break open for more powerful cartridges? (375 and up)
What do you consider as a faster loading system?
Pros and cons between them upon your experience?
CZ
 
Posts: 208 | Location: Prague, Czech Republic | Registered: 28 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have always been a fan of the Ruger No1.

I have owned two a 243 and a 45/70. Both shoot good, I used the 45/70 with some upper loads.
I have shot 375 H&H and 458 Win Mag No1's as well.

However, after my experience with break open guns, especially a single shot Blaser K 95, I now prefer a break open rifle for a single shot.

One of the reasons is, I really like the fact that a break open "gun", rifle, combo gun, drilling, double rifle drilling, or double rifle, can be transported to the hunt, broken down, in a case half as long as a "normal" rifle case.

Also it is very easy to have more than one barrel fitted to a break open system...


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Well, Ruger # 1's tend to be heavy compared to the break open stalking rifles such as the Blaser K 95 or the Merkel K-1. My heart warms for a Merkel but I would not say no to a Blaser. A 270 would be oh so right for most all of my current hunting chores.
 
Posts: 1070 | Location: East Haddam, CT | Registered: 16 July 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am a big fan of the falling blocks such as the Ruger #1, but I also find some of the break actions extremely accurate and handy. I am listing a new in box Merkel K-3 in .308 with a Swarovski 3x9x42 Z-3, and I bet the whole package doesn't weight 7.5 lbs. For a mountain or stalking rifle, it's perfect. And these K-3's are the most accurate rifles Merkel have ever built.


JP Sauer Drilling 12x12x9.3x72
David Murray Scottish Hammer 12 Bore
Alex Henry 500/450 Double Rifle
Steyr Classic Mannlicher Fullstock 6.5x55
Steyr Classic Mannlicher Fullstock .30-06
Walther PPQ H2 9mm
Walther PPS M2
Cogswell & Harrison Hammer 12 Bore Damascus
And Too Many More
 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Chattanooga, TN | Registered: 10 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
They both have advantages and disadvantages. Break open single shot rifles tend to be lighter than falling block rifles. In sitting and prone positions falling block rifles are easier to unload and reload than break open rifles.




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of f224
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by N E 450 No2:
I have always been a fan of the Ruger No1.

I have owned two a 243 and a 45/70. Both shoot good, I used the 45/70 with some upper loads.
I have shot 375 H&H and 458 Win Mag No1's as well.

However, after my experience with break open guns, especially a single shot Blaser K 95, I now prefer a break open rifle for a single shot.

One of the reasons is, I really like the fact that a break open "gun", rifle, combo gun, drilling, double rifle drilling, or double rifle, can be transported to the hunt, broken down, in a case half as long as a "normal" rifle case.

Also it is very easy to have more than one barrel fitted to a break open system...


What Tony said, I have a Blaser K-95 and it shoots sub .5moa with every load I have tried in it.


Captain Dave Funk
Operator
www.BlaserPro.com
 
Posts: 842 | Location: Dallas, Iowa, USA | Registered: 05 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505ED
posted Hide Post
I like the break guns too. I had a K 95 in a 243 that was very accurate, and now have a Luxus M11 in a 6BR that is just as accurate.


DRSS Member
 
Posts: 2289 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a K95 and always wanted a #1.

The big issue with the #1 for me is the fact that loading and unloading is nigh on impossible to do silently. Add in the questionable reputation for accuracy (maybe not fair but it's there) and I haven't gone there.

The K95 is a dream
 
Posts: 2032 | Registered: 05 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
After handling both a No1 and a Merkel K1, I can only conclude that I must own one of both action type at some point. I think I'll be budgeting for a nice, handy break open first. Really love the way they shoulder and carry, not to mention how they look.
 
Posts: 1450 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FFemt5287:
After handling both a No1 and a Merkel K1, I can only conclude that I must own one of both action type at some point. I think I'll be budgeting for a nice, handy break open first. Really love the way they shoulder and carry, not to mention how they look.


I find that since its acquisition several months ago, I am constantly conjuring up reasons to employ my little Merkel K1 rather that other rifles in my collection.





In fact I've been in contact with Steyr/Merkel to see if I can acquire a barrel and fore-end in the stutzen configuration in a 9.3 x 74R chambering. The 7-08 and that would cover a number of bases.

Best

GWB
 
Posts: 23752 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
^^^^^You^^^^^, my friend, are to blame for my new found lust for a K1! I've my eyes peeled for a nice .270 once funds become available....
 
Posts: 1450 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
They both have advantages and disadvantages. Break open single shot rifles tend to be lighter than falling block rifles. In sitting and prone positions falling block rifles are easier to unload and reload than break open rifles.


x2
 
Posts: 818 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
2 problems and ONLY 2 problems with the breakopens IMO. First (and something I could probably live with, grin) is the difficulty of reloading while prone.

Second (and a LOT harder for me to overcome) is the cost of a good one. I don't need and wouldn't have the factory wood and while the factory barrels are accurate they are also expensive and limited in appearance/accouterments.

So at least for now I guess I'll hafta be content with the falling blocks (grin).
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My only experiences with break opens are with H&R and T/C guns, but I'd rather have a Number 1 or other falling block in a heavy caliber (especially one that runs at relatively high pressure). It just think a falling block is a stronger action.
 
Posts: 641 | Location: SW Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: 10 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
2 problems and ONLY 2 problems with the breakopens IMO. First (and something I could probably live with, grin) is the difficulty of reloading while prone.

Second (and a LOT harder for me to overcome) is the cost of a good one. I don't need and wouldn't have the factory wood and while the factory barrels are accurate they are also expensive and limited in appearance/accouterments.

So at least for now I guess I'll hafta be content with the falling blocks (grin).
Regards, Joe

yup me2
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I used a Ruger 1H 450/400ne last year, will use it again this year. I have an 1885 in 300H&H to blood this year, which at 10lbs 2oz, is a tad heavier than I'd like, but, will get by with it. I also picked up a Merkel K1 7 Remmag this spring. Took 3 yrs of watching on them, to see the price come down to where it was viable. Looking forward to trying it out.
They all shoot well. The #1 is comfy to carry all day for me, likely a pound or a bit more, lighter than the 1885 though. The Merkel is just sweet in the carry/handling dept, although it felt a bit like the 450/400 on the shoulder, w/o a recoil pad on it, that has been cured though.

Strengthwise as to the actions, I won't try to hot rod the Merkel, it is a good action, but, I don't need to test it , either. In fact, I will likely run 140's out of it @ 2950 or so, that will do what I need it to do,if asked to.

They are all just fun to play with.


Krieghoff Classic 30R Blaser
Stevens 044-1/2 218 Bee
Ruger #1A 7-08
Rem 700 7-08
Tikka t3x lite 6.5 creedmo
Tikka TAC A1 6.5 creedmo
Win 1885 300H&H. 223Rem
Merkel K1 7 Rem mag
CCFR
 
Posts: 284 | Location: southern AB | Registered: 17 May 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
As all have agreed above, both action types can be found serving as the bases for some very nice and very accurate rifles.

About the only type of single shot action I don't like is the side-lever falling blocks.

Even the finest, such as the older Dan'l Fraser "best-grade" .303s built in Edinburgh are sometimes danged near impossible to get reliable extraction from....especially if you want to be able to use whatever factory ammo comes along when you are on an extended hunt in foreign climes.

I agree that falling blocks likely have more innate strength, but I also think that break actions often feel handier in the field. It seems easier to stock a break-action so it shoulders and handles like an excquisite ahotgun than some falling blocks allow.

All JMO....I'll provide a good home to any of either which you wish to exile to my premises postage paid.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 209jones:
I used a Ruger 1H 450/400ne last year, will use it again this year. I have an 1885 in 300H&H to blood this year, which at 10lbs 2oz, is a tad heavier than I'd like, but, will get by with it. I also picked up a Merkel K1 7 Remmag this spring. Took 3 yrs of watching on them, to see the price come down to where it was viable. Looking forward to trying it out.
They all shoot well. The #1 is comfy to carry all day for me, likely a pound or a bit more, lighter than the 1885 though. The Merkel is just sweet in the carry/handling dept, although it felt a bit like the 450/400 on the shoulder, w/o a recoil pad on it, that has been cured though.

Strengthwise as to the actions, I won't try to hot rod the Merkel, it is a good action, but, I don't need to test it , either. In fact, I will likely run 140's out of it @ 2950 or so, that will do what I need it to do,if asked to.

They are all just fun to play with.



Winchester obviously didn't make very many .300 H&H's in the 1885. I've been looking for one that's up for sale, can't find one anywhere. If I eventually find one and the wood looks good, I'll grab it.

Let us know how yours shoots. It is quite heavy for caliber. Recoil should be nothing.


JP Sauer Drilling 12x12x9.3x72
David Murray Scottish Hammer 12 Bore
Alex Henry 500/450 Double Rifle
Steyr Classic Mannlicher Fullstock 6.5x55
Steyr Classic Mannlicher Fullstock .30-06
Walther PPQ H2 9mm
Walther PPS M2
Cogswell & Harrison Hammer 12 Bore Damascus
And Too Many More
 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Chattanooga, TN | Registered: 10 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It took a while for me to get the 1885, nearly 20 months. Up here we pay dearly for it also.there are a couple more up here, and a 375. The wood is not fancy on them, I have some walnut I will whittle away on this winter for it. I had to grit my teeth and turn down the 375 as I have a Krieghoff double coming. It is really nice to shoot. One of the reasons it is heavy is Leupold rings and a 4.5-14x44 Conquest on it. All I have shot in it so far is factory 180 Hornady Interbonds. It likes them well enough that I haven't bothered developing any loads for it yet.Bought 80 of them with it, have about 25-30 left to blast off to get the brass.
I will take it hunting over the next couple of weeks, Likely will use it on some cutblocks or pipelines where I can sit with it.


Krieghoff Classic 30R Blaser
Stevens 044-1/2 218 Bee
Ruger #1A 7-08
Rem 700 7-08
Tikka t3x lite 6.5 creedmo
Tikka TAC A1 6.5 creedmo
Win 1885 300H&H. 223Rem
Merkel K1 7 Rem mag
CCFR
 
Posts: 284 | Location: southern AB | Registered: 17 May 2011Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Single Shot Rifles    Break open single shot rifle vs Ruger No.1

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia