I had an opportunity to shoot a Ruger #1 in 30H&H this past weekend. I've long admired these single shot rifles but never owned one. Now I'm getting the itch to have one and have long wanted a rifle in 300H&H.

I've seen the Boddington series of these online but never in person. Can you #1 experts tell me what the main differences are between the Boddington version and your regular #1 are? Is it worth a couple/few extra hundred bucks?

Thanks for your replies.

Local fellow has quite a collection of No.1's as you mention and believe only difference would be cosmetic or upgraded wood, etc. Can't recall for sure, but the rear sight may be fixed/standing as opposed to the flip up std. version??
Would warn you that these rifles can become addictive for they are easy to like very quickly!! Have three now which I customized caliber/barrel wise, 45/70, 22-250, and soon to be finished 348Win. Ruger web site offers an excellent video on the take down, assembly, cleaning of these rifles. No question that the Boddington versions are an upgraded offering and very nice compared to std. versions and overall the pricing of all No.1's makes for a lot of value for the investment.

I have the Boddington #1 in 300H&H. Shot a Leopard this past June with it. Great rifle. As far as the differences go, I've seen the standard #1 in 300H&H since purchasing my rifle and there is not a lot of difference except the serial number. I think the wood is a bit nicer, with maybe a bit better checkering. Also, the rear sight is fixed with no flip ups and it comes with detachable scope rings. I think both models have the barrel band front sling swivel.

Thanks gents.

Boddington models have (very nice)fixed rear sights, circassian stocks, matte blue finish and come with a set of warne QD rings. I have one in .450NE and love it. Consider an immediate upgrade to the limbsaver pre fit No1 pad. Its well worth the $30!