THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SINGLE SHOT RIFLES FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ruger No 1 Pressure Problems??
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
I recently purchased a Ruger No 1 in 6mm Remington.

After I got it home I took it to the range with some FACTORY Winchester Super X loaded with 80 gr. bullets.

The accuracy was ok but had one problem.

A moderately flattened primer and pronounced offset ring all the way around the cartridge at its base. the ring is NOT perfectly uniform
either. The offset is more pronounced on one side of the cartridge.

There is no black smoke around the primer and the firing pin hole is not cratered or pierced.

Also this is my first No 1 Ruger so when a cartridge is chambered should you be able to see the top part of the rim on the case??

My GUT feeling is that this is an obvious sign that the rifle has been over loaded at some point in time damaging the chamber??



I contacted the person I purchased it from and he claims this is perfectly normal because this is a high pressure round and that his brass fired frome the rifle is in the same shape. To be fair to him he is claiming that the rifle was always like this as he purchased it from another individual. I The rifle dates back to 1972 so it could have had MANY owners over last 33 years.

I am going to take it too a gunsmith to have chamber measured and rifle checked out ASAP.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd take the time to ship it to Ruger and have them check it out. I've heard good things about how they stand behind their product.

However---How many rounds looked this way?
1 or all?

The shells slide all the way in the chamber on my Browning Falling Block--unless I've resized them wrong or seated the bullet into the lands. Your shooting factory shells and I would think they'd slide all the way in too----unless the chamber has some form of build up inside.

Not that I'm an expert but these signs of yours don't say overload to me, not that I can say what the problem is. This type of action is so strong and they lock the shell so postive in the chamber that if the rifle was damaged by an overload more than this would be obvious.

I think I'd super clean the chamber and barrel, oil it up lightly, try a few more rounds throught it, and if the problems persist, send it to Ruger.
 
Posts: 139 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Yes they all had flattened primer and offset pressure ring some were a little more pronounced than others.

I am going to try some Federal factory ammmo and contact Ruger rep in Canada to where I can send it in to get it checked over and tested...
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cory,
Please let us know how this turns out.
I have a Number 1 also, but haven't had any pressure problems. Something is dead wrong with your rifle.
Maybe the Ruger Rep can contact someone at Ruger to shorten up the time to get it fixed.
Good luck,
Don




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cory006:

The accuracy was ok but had one problem.

A moderately flattened primer and pronounced offset ring all the way around the cartridge at its base. the ring is NOT perfectly uniform
either. The offset is more pronounced on one side of the cartridge.

Not necessarily something wrong. Your 1972 Ruger had a barrel made by an outside contractor. Some were great, some good, and some totally terrible. The flattened primer is no big deal and the ring you speak of is probably a chamber of maximum dimensions. The offset is pefectly normal. Consider this. the chamber has to be larger than the cartridge in order for it to chamber. When you shoot the gun, the case expands to fill the chamber in ALL directions. After the pressure drops the case tries to go back to it's original dimensions, but cannot. Lying at the bottom of the chamber, the top of the case expamds more than the bottom, thus the ring you see will be greater on one side. I'm willing to bet that if you had a chamber cast made from your rifle, you'll find the you have a large chamber tht is still within SAAMI specs. Consider this, on the flattened primer; if your rifle has a chamber that is at the maximum for headspace, when the primer fires, it drives the case forward. Then, as the expanding gases push in all directions, the rear of the case is slammed back against the breech block flattening the primer. Again, perfectly normal.
There is no black smoke around the primer and the firing pin hole is not cratered or pierced.

Seems perfectly normal to me.

Also this is my first No 1 Ruger so when a cartridge is chambered should you be able to see the top part of the rim on the case??

I never noticed this myself, so I went and chambered rounds in several of the #1 rifles in my collection, and yes, they all show a slight bit of brass, so that's normal as well.

My GUT feeling is that this is an obvious sign that the rifle has been over loaded at some point in time damaging the chamber??

Gut feelings are not always correct. However, if it will make you feel better, take it to a gunsmith and have him do a chamber cast and check the headspacing. Then, if something is radically wrong, then I would contact Ruger with your findings and have them look at it.



I contacted the person I purchased it from and he claims this is perfectly normal because this is a high pressure round and that his brass fired frome the rifle is in the same shape. To be fair to him he is claiming that the rifle was always like this as he purchased it from another individual. I The rifle dates back to 1972 so it could have had MANY owners over last 33 years.

I agree with the comment that the 6MM Rem. is a high pressure round and that all is normal.
Relax and enjoy your Ruger #1. They're a lot of fun to shoot and hunt with. That must be true as I have 16 of the little buggers and am looking for #17. Seriously, I don't think you have any problems at all.
Paul B.

I am going to take it too a gunsmith to have chamber measured and rifle checked out ASAP.
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks to "Paul B" for a very good reply.
 
Posts: 139 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'd say something is wrong... Doesn't sound right to me. Perhaps the headspacing is excessive at the breech?

Send it back, the couple weeks it takes will be well worth the peace of mind.

PS: The 6mm Rem is a fine round.


.22 LR Ruger M77/22
30-06 Ruger M77/MkII
.375 H&H Ruger RSM
 
Posts: 863 | Location: Mtns of the Desert Southwest, USA | Registered: 26 February 2004Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Thanks Paul B, GREAT informative post.

This comfirms what some others have told me, and what the guy I got it from said too.


This is my first 6mm and my first Ruger #1 so I am a little in the dark and also first time I seen a flattened primer from factory ammunition.

The rifle is in VERY good condition with only a few marks on the wood and bluing is pretty much all intact. It dates back to 1972 with serial number search so I got lucky. A year later and it would have had a Wilson barrel.


It has 26 inch barrel(Douglass premium I am pretty sure) and has Boss CR installed and previous owner said he could get 1/2 groups at 200 yards with it.

If I get a chance I will post some pics of rifle and fired casings...

Also, I dropped an email to Ruger repair reps in Canada. If they think there is a problem I will send it in to them and have it checked over.

Thnx to all that replied.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I doubt there is anything worng with your rifle.
As the doctor wrote WBNM, well baby nervous mother.

The 6mm is a high pressure round and will produce this condition if the chamber is larger than the minimum size. I have found that once fired 6mm Rem (and 25/06) brass is the worst about having blown primers with factory ammo. You can check the rear diameter of the chamber with a small hole gage or gauge pins and compare it to the SAAMI spec. It it looks to be oversize you can send it back. If not you might find some brass with a larger head diameter. It only has to be .002 to .003 larger to make a significant.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Would one be better off to full length re-size or leave cases expanded and neck size only.

This rifle will be for target shooting and varmiting mainly.

May used it for odd deer hunt I usaually bow hunt for big game.

Fired brass chambers and extracts with ease. My concern is over working the brass in this area by full length re-sizing.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would partial size with a FL sizer, however I can't recommend Lyman for this since their dies do squeeze the body down more than most. Most standard sizers will not squeeze the case head back to factory size so you will not be sizing it as much as you think.
You could borrow a .243 FL sizer and try neck sizing with it. Just remember size the neck only. If you adjust the .243 die too close to the shell holder you will create excess headspace on you 6MM brass which is very bad and dangerous.
You might try Remington brass. It is sometimes a little thicker and doe not show such a sharp bulge.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
What about using 7x57 Norma Brass and forming it the same way one would form 6mm Remington Ackley Improved ...

The base of the 7x57 is only a few thousands larger than base of 6mm remington and the rim is exact same measurement. This may give me a perfect fit.

This would be a pain cause I would have to turn necks...which i have never done before??

I will take things slow do lots of research and hopefully not lose any digits in the process...
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Just mounted Simmons 6.5x20 44 Mag scope today.(premium optics)

Took it to the range. VERY cold and fairly windy so probably could have done better.

Winchester factory Super X 80gr.

3 groups under 1 inch at 100 Yards.(best one was .830)

2 groups at 200 yards were right around 2 inchs.

I know by benchrest standards this is not very good but it is a good start for me. This was never intended as a benchrest rifle but is going to be a varmint and occasional deer hunting rifle.

Handloads with premium bullets should shrink these groups which for a Ruger No. 1 will suit me just fine thanx.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
The base of the 7x57 is only a few thousands larger than base of 6mm remington and the rim is exact same measurement. This may give me a perfect fit.


Don't use the book data for case head diameters without measuring the actual brass. You might find that Remington brass is slightly larger and thicker producing less of a step. In addition you can also look at .257 Roberts brass.
I doubt that you would have to neck turn formed brass. To be sure measure, the neck diameter of you chamber with gage pins of make a chamber casting.
In the mean time if you can't stand that "sorry" shooting 6MM just ship it to me. I will give the poor thing a home. roflmao
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Cory. you don't need a premium bullet to get good groups. Just shoot Sierras. Cheaper and asa ccurate a standard bullet as you'll ever find.
Paul B.
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DMB:
Cory,
Please let us know how this turns out.
I have a Number 1 also, but haven't had any pressure problems. Something is dead wrong with your rifle.
Maybe the Ruger Rep can contact someone at Ruger to shorten up the time to get it fixed.
Good luck,
Don


BULL! If anything is wrong, it is more than likely a problem with the ammo, not the rifle! However, please note that flattened primers don't necessarily mean that pressures are too high! And yes, when the No. 1 action is locked shut, you CAN see the top edge of the cartridge rim......


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Here is pic of shell casings...

 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I bet it's a headspace problem. I had a ruger m-77 in 220 swift that did the same thing. Had a gunsmith set the barrel back a bit and problem went away. If that is the problem, ruger will fix it for free I bet.
deadeyejehlen
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Willow, AK | Registered: 26 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Corey. your pictures confirm what I thought was the problem. You have a chamber on the large side. That doesn't mean a headspacing problem, just that the chamber is slightly oversize at the rear.Just set you sizing die to partially size and you should not have any problems. One of my #1s in .300 Win. mag. does the same thing and the 100 rounds of Federal brass that I bought as factory ammo for it alost 30 years ago has been loaded about ten times and is still going strong, and take my word for it, I load them hot. A 200 gr. bullet at 2950 FPS.
Paul B.
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hi,
In my 7x57 the spent cases differed according to manufacturer.
PMC showed a bulge as in the pictures above, Highland; which are to manufactured European CIP standard, did not. I measured unfired cases and yes the Highland's were closer to CIP specs. Unfortunately the Highland rims are to CIP specs too which means it will not fit into a 30-06 size shell holder but the PMC ones will.
The shell holder differences are simular with 6.5x55 cases. Remington are fine in the 30-06 holder some European ones just won't fit. S&B come to mind.
Since the 6 mms' parent case is the 7x57 it does not surprise to read of this problem.
Ho Hum.
 
Posts: 1374 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paul B:
Corey. your pictures confirm what I thought was the problem. You have a chamber on the large side. That doesn't mean a headspacing problem, just that the chamber is slightly oversize at the rear.Just set you sizing die to partially size and you should not have any problems. One of my #1s in .300 Win. mag. does the same thing and the 100 rounds of Federal brass that I bought as factory ammo for it alost 30 years ago has been loaded about ten times and is still going strong, and take my word for it, I load them hot. A 200 gr. bullet at 2950 FPS.
Paul B.


This is also the impression I get from looking at your picture. I have a number of rifles that leave cases looking pretty much the same as yours, and there's nothing wrong with any of them.


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BigRx
posted Hide Post
cory006,

I concur with the consensus of the pictures that your chamber appears on the large size.

I would partial F.L. size as recommended if it were mine.

You didn't show a picture of the primers but the web (pressure ring) looks OK from what you can see in the picture. It doesn't appear to have an abrupt start to it that can signal higher pressures.

It is normal in a #1 to see some rim protrude from the chamber. (i.e. the breechblock doesn't close tight against the barrel tenon face.)

BigRx
 
Posts: 208 | Location: Idaho Rockies | Registered: 25 December 2004Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Do you know the dimensions of your chamber??

You mentioned that you have a custom barrel on your #1. It may be that even with factory ammo that the bullet you are shooting is already touching the lands.

I have a #1 in .243 and the standard Ruger chamber is a good deal shorter than the max COL for .243 ammo! I discovered that by getting some seriously overpressured brass from a few rounds of standard COL ammo.
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: 17 May 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Coltdriver:
Do you know the dimensions of your chamber??

You mentioned that you have a custom barrel on your #1. It may be that even with factory ammo that the bullet you are shooting is already touching the lands.

I have a #1 in .243 and the standard Ruger chamber is a good deal shorter than the max COL for .243 ammo! I discovered that by getting some seriously overpressured brass from a few rounds of standard COL ammo.


No dimensions yet but I have been in touch with a couple of smiths to arrange a cast.


It is Original factory barrel, but at that time Ruger outsourced their barrel production to DOUGLASS.


I checked the overall length and 80 gr bullets do not even come close to the lands..I could go WAY over max cartridge length if I like...

I think I will try some neck sizing in the interm...then get chamber cast done and decide what to do from there...

Either set barrel back and re-chamber or get new custom barrel.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cory006:
quote:
Originally posted by Coltdriver:
Do you know the dimensions of your chamber??

You mentioned that you have a custom barrel on your #1. It may be that even with factory ammo that the bullet you are shooting is already touching the lands.

I have a #1 in .243 and the standard Ruger chamber is a good deal shorter than the max COL for .243 ammo! I discovered that by getting some seriously overpressured brass from a few rounds of standard COL ammo.


No dimensions yet but I have been in touch with a couple of smiths to arrange a cast.


It is Original factory barrel, but at that time Ruger outsourced their barrel production to DOUGLASS.


I checked the overall length and 80 gr bullets do not even come close to the lands..I could go WAY over max cartridge length if I like...

I think I will try some neck sizing in the interm...then get chamber cast done and decide what to do from there...

Either set barrel back and re-chamber or get new custom barrel.


Do you mean the Douglas Barrel outfit in W.VA.?? They make excellent barrels! Here's five shots @ 100 yards from a Douglas Premium Grade in 6mm/284...



"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Pretty sure it is one and the same. I believe all Ruger No 1's up until 1973 had premium Douglas barrels.

from 1973 on they went to Wilson barrels and thats where they started having problems...
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Cory. They sure as hell weren't premium barrels, not at the $10 apiece Ruger paid for them. I was fortunate in only getting one really bad barrel on a #1A in 7x57 Mauser. Damn thing had a rwo inch lonf throat as determined by a chamber cast. I notified Ruger. They said to send it in, and after about a four month wait, I got it back with a whole new barrel.
I gues I'll just have to repeat myself, but I think your barrel is just fine.
Paul B.
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paul B:
Cory. They sure as hell weren't premium barrels, not at the $10 apiece Ruger paid for them. I was fortunate in only getting one really bad barrel on a #1A in 7x57 Mauser. Damn thing had a rwo inch lonf throat as determined by a chamber cast. I notified Ruger. They said to send it in, and after about a four month wait, I got it back with a whole new barrel.



I gues I'll just have to repeat myself, but I think your barrel is just fine.
Paul B.




Youch...I thought they were "GOOD" barrels??? I think some would disagree with you on that fact. Mine gets such good accuracy I will not touch it for the time being...guess I won't be looking for anymore from that era. LOL

This is my first Ruger No 1 and I still LOVE the rifle and the caliber. If I can get 3/4 inch groups at 100 yards with factory ammo it will make a FINE varmint and deer rifle...
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill Mc
posted Hide Post
I have a couple of #1s. Here's a case fro the 22/250 that has been fired about 5 times. It shows an expansion ring also. but since then I have reloaded it 4 more times.

I do sized oly the neck using a FL die. Accuracy is OK for a #1 (I'm spoiled by my CZ)



Back to the still.

Spelling, I don't need no stinkin spelling

The older I get, the better I was.
 
Posts: 1450 | Location: North Georgia | Registered: 16 December 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Did up some handloads:

Rem Brass
44 gr of RL-22
CCI-200
Nosler Ballistic Silver Tip(95gr)



2 groups had a couple spoilers in them, 3rd group is the best...

http://www.hunt101.com/img/293933.jpg


Cases also look alot better with Remington brass as well....
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cory006:
Did up some handloads:

Rem Brass
44 gr of RL-22
CCI-200
Nosler Ballistic Silver Tip(95gr)



2 groups had a couple spoilers in them, 3rd group is the best...

http://www.hunt101.com/img/293933.jpg


Cases also look alot better with Remington brass as well....


Cory! This is how your "problematic" No. 1 shoots?? Damn good rifle!!


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Cory. Murphy's Second Law: "IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT." That rifle ain't broke. thumb
Paul B.
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I hope as I increase the powder charge it shrinks the groups even more... Big Grin
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 01 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
I seriously doubt that there is anything wrong with your rifle or that your chamber is particularly "oversize".

Your chamber may be at maximum of SAAMI specs, but that is not a bad thing per se. Actually, it may be a good thing, as it also means your rifle will probably chamber & safely fire any factory 6 m/m Remington ammo from any maker on earth.

What I DO suspect is that the ammo you got is of minimum SAAMI spec....i.e., small enough dimensions to fit in any factory chamber of that name, from any large production gun maker in the world.

That's why SAAMI specs exist, to make sure all the factory ammo will work in all the factory chambers.

It does mean that whenever you shoot minimum size ammo in maximum size chambers, you can get some less than beautiful fire-formed hulls.


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia