hi: I used to have a .35 Whelan..but don't know the answer to your question...you left out a 1 in 12 twist. I think your best answer would be to call a long time barrel maker like Douglas...they would best answer you & would be a professional, expert opinion. Generally, longer heavier bullets, all else being equal require faster twists...you didn't say what bullet weight you were going to use? I have a rifle that has a 1 in 7 &1/2 twist,bet you can't guess what it is. An original military US Rifle. Tom
Verhoositz my 35 Whelen AI has a 1 in 12 twist and shoots moa with all 200, 225 and 250 gr bullets even the old Barnes 250 X which I don't think is cataloged anymore.
Bisonland, would that US military rifle be a 6MM Lee Navy?
Bob
Posts: 1 | Location: PA/USA | Registered: 04 January 2005
Even 1 in 16" as Remington woefully uses will stabilize 250's on paper. BUT, if hunting is your game, especially big, thick stuff; WE NEED to get away from this 19th century "only enough twist to stabilize for best accuracy"
The Germans had a better idea on twist....fast!No wonder the ol' 9.3 x 62 is still going strong!
I would recommend 1 in 12 " minimum for the Whelen and personally am considering building one with 1 in 10" especially for those 310 grain Woodleighs! A little 9.3 x 62 blood into the Whelen would certainly help!
A 1-10 wouldn't be as friendly with cast bullets. I'd go with 1-12 or 1-14. With 1-12, you'll have enough should you decide to try some 280 or 310 gr bullets.
Don't dismiss shooting cast through a whelen, there are few things funner then pushing cast pistol bullets at 1200-1700 fps over 10-15 gr of unique, having mild recoil and report, but suprisingly small groups. Nothing like cheap trigger time, especially when it leaves a big grin on your face.
__________________________________________________ The AR series of rounds, ridding the world of 7mm rem mags, one gun at a time.
Posts: 7213 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 27 February 2001
As I am contemplating building another .35 Whelen, I discussed it with two gunmakers here in Tucson. Both Randy Lawson and Sterling Davenport were unanimous in stating that a 1 in 12" twist was the way to go. With that said, I wonder why Remington and Ruger had their heads up their asses by going with the 1 in 16" twist? I believe both Whelen and James Howe felt that 1 in 12" was the way to go. I have the Remington Classic and Ruger 77 with the 1 in 16" twists and a custom Mauser with a 1 in 14" twist. The next one will be a 1 in 12", period! A bit OT, but when Winchester brought out the .358 Win., they used a 1 in 12" twist. Why in bloody hell did Ruger use a 1 in 16" twist for their .358 M77? Guess their engineers like their heads in warm dark places. Paul B.
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001
Originally posted by RIP: The best .35 Whelens that I have known had 1:12" twists, like my Pre-64 M70 with a Douglas Premium 24" long no.4 countour sporter with 12" twist.
I had a 1-12" #3 Douglas in a 358 Win that was the best 35 cal I have ever owned in 40+ years of toying with such things.
Remember, forgivness is easier to get than permission.
Posts: 4000 | Location: Hudsonville MI USA | Registered: 08 June 2000
I'm just glad no one is telling these Idaho Moose that my Remington is shooting those 250 grainers through them with only a 16" twist. Ignorance is bliss, in this case..... FWIW, Dutch.
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly dog.
Posts: 4564 | Location: Idaho Falls, ID, USA | Registered: 21 September 2000