I too believe I'd stick with the 1/12" This twist has proven quite accurate in the .308. I suppose the 1/14 would be fast enough for bullets not much over the length of that 168-grain. But if you ever wanted to use a 200-grain for longer ranges, you'd be out of luck.
I'm having my (shot out .22-250) Ruger MK II VT rebarreled in .308 Win. I want to build a precision rifle around the Sierra 168 MK. The gunsmith advises a 1-14" twist, while I think a 1-12" would be better. Your advise is welcome.
Posts: 2420 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 25 August 2001
Andre, don't worry about "over-stabilizing" bullets with a faster twist than you might absolutely need. You get an awful lot of flexibility in exchange. If this was a bench gun, and you were hell-bent on shooting aggregate match results in the .2's, perhaps (but only perhaps) then I would go for the slowest possible twist. But if you are building an informal accuracy rifle based on a Ruger, I doubt you'll see any difference from over-stabilization.
What barrel manufacture are you getting?? - mike
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002
S/S Lothar Walther of course, what else . Thanks for the info, friends. Knowing I really can't go wrong between 1-10" and 1-14" gives me some margin in terms of immediate availablity.
Posts: 2420 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 25 August 2001
Think also in terms of the maximum distance that you might want to shoot at. The Hunter Benchrest crowd, who shoot light bullets at short (100 - 200 yards/meters) go for the looser twists. Military snipers, who have to deliver their little HPBT tokens of affection much further out go for the tighter twists. As DKing alluded to above, the 175 SMK is a superior bullet. With a 24 - 26" barrel it (and the Laua 155) will get you all the way to 1000 still supersonic.
Posts: 7158 | Location: Snake River | Registered: 02 February 2004