One of Us
| I don't know if you're "supposed to", but I've always set mine up at the lower end. |
| |
one of us
| I set it from where it's closest and most likely to whack me. Anywhere else and if I change the power "in the heat of battle" I may not adjust and get bitten. |
| Posts: 1694 | Location: East Coast | Registered: 06 January 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| That was my reasoning Rob when I set it on high. I guess I'll test it out, it's not like it's welded in place. thanks guys.
Red |
| Posts: 4740 | Location: Fresno, CA | Registered: 21 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I suggest first setting on highest power where the image is smallest and you are likely to "crawl the stock" and get a scope cut. Get a proper image and ensure you are safely positioned. Then when you lower the power setting, the image will appear large and the field of view expansive. The turrett locations can require compromise on positioning so do the best you can within the parameters. |
| |
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by armorer: I suggest first setting on highest power where the image is smallest and you are likely to "crawl the stock" and get a scope cut. Get a proper image and ensure you are safely positioned. Then when you lower the power setting, the image will appear large and the field of view expansive. The turrett locations can require compromise on positioning so do the best you can within the parameters.
+1 |
| |
One of Us
| the highest power setting is going to be the most critical to eye relief. you almost have to use that to get it in the right place when you crank it up. |
| Posts: 415 | Location: no-central wisconsin | Registered: 21 October 2008 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Thanks guys, this is reassuring. Hopefully next weekend I'll get a chance to go out and shoot it.
Red |
| Posts: 4740 | Location: Fresno, CA | Registered: 21 March 2003 |
IP
|
|