one of us
| In theory the 308 might just clean up.
I would rather have a 308 or a 30/06 in particular if it's a 22" barrel.
The #1's are chambered in 300 Win Mag. Just buy one of these if you must have a mag. It's a much better cartridge than the .300 H&H. |
| |
one of us
| True, but I want a .300 H&H, for the same reason people drive a 60's Corvette when a brand new one would drive better... |
| Posts: 546 | Location: Oklahoma City, OK | Registered: 29 November 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I understand. I have a 300 H&H also.
John Lewis is a smith in the Carolina's that seems to have some good ideas on #1's. If I was going to convert one I would have the hammer spring changed, the hammmer lightened and most of all the trigger improved.
Make sure that the 308 does not have an 1-12 twist. |
| |
one of us
| One needs to check the chamber specs. The .308 is very large in the shoulder area and I know a 30-06 will not clean the chamber...I'm not sure about the 300 H&H but it does have a lot of slope...I personally would re-barrel it with a Lothar Walther 26" barrel...A 22" 300 H&H won't perform much better than a 30-06... |
| Posts: 42314 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Hmm. Alot to think about, especially when I've already got a nice Model 70 in .30-06. |
| Posts: 546 | Location: Oklahoma City, OK | Registered: 29 November 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Let me add that if I had a single shot rechambered to .300 H&H that I would have it throated just a little bit longer. The throat in my M 70 seems so short.
If the rifle shot well as a 30/06 or 308 then it should shoot well as a 300 H&H. No need to pay for a new barrel. |
| |