Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I have one purchased new in 1982. I have run over 2000 rounds through mine--- never had a jam or misfeed. The CRF advocates would tell you it is not a true DG rifle. Mine is for me! I would much rather have the tang safety which is very quick and push feed than the 3-position nightmare type safety on the Winchester or mauser rifles and controlled feeding. By the way -- I also have a Winchester Classic Custom African from the custom shop in .470 Capstick. For myself--------The Ruger is my 1st choice on DG. I would not let the fact that it is push feed deter its use. The key in my opinion is to shoot it frequently enough that you are positive that it functions every time, then one can feel confident in the rifle no matter what the engineering on the gun is. Also, in my case I have Ruger mark 1's in 30-06, 300 WM, and 338 WM -- so the rifle design is one that is second nature as I have been using the tang safety on my primary hunting rifle reguardless of gane from 1978. By the way--- I quit buying Ruger rifles when they became "wanna be 70's". I figured I might as well buy Winchester rifles and have the origional if I was stuck with that engineering. Sorry to rant-- but the controlled feeding boys really get my goat sometimes! | ||
|
Moderator |
buckeye, The discussion was whether the action was suitable for a DG caliber, not whether it made a good DGR. There is a difference. No one with African DG experience mentioned a requirement for CRF for African DG. If DG is not on the menu, the only thing a jam will cost you is the trophy. Your personal preferences aside, there is nothing wrong with a three-position safety. A person is just as likely to leave a two-position safety in the wrong position as they are a three-position safety. Familiarity with the rifle will prevent most occurrences of that faux pas . Now, how do you like your .470 Capstick? Have you used it on any game? George | |||
|
one of us |
MLG, The Mark 1's were push feed actions. For a DGR one wants a true CRF. If that action has a plunger in the bolt face for an ejector then I would pass on it unless you just want to shoot it for non DGR purposes or use cast bullets etc. If it has a Mauser type ejector, which I doubt, I would grind off the part of the bolt face and make it a CRF. Of course the wood and price affect me as well. Some of those old Ruger 458's had the finest wood. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia