Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Does anyone have a source of reference or a link of how I could solve for the implications or impact of how the height of a front sight affects trajectory? Example: Win 94 30-30 has to have front sight replaced. Factory orginal size is 0.360". Available replacements are either 0.343" or 0.375" respectively. Difference on the +/-Y-axis is relatively identical but I have no reference material here to actually determine the impact. Any help would be very much appericated, and thanks in advance. [ 07-18-2002, 06:17: Message edited by: Alex Szabo ] | ||
|
one of us |
If I understand your question correctly, there is a fairly simple solution, using the concept of similar triangles, even though the trajectory of the bullet is not perfectly flat. The increase in the height of the point of impact is about the distance to the target times the increase in front sight height, divided by the sight radius. In my 29" Swede, .001" at the front sight works out to about 1/8" at 100 yards. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Hi Denton, Thanks for the rapid response. Yes, you are on target. Before this, I drew a few lines on a piece of paper, and determined that I could calculate [trigonometrically] the plus or minus theta angle(s) if I had two points of reference. Because the difference is only a linear measurement, I do not know how to convert the linear unit to the angle that it represents. If I understand your approach and methodology however, you are simply expressing this same problem with a horizontal Z-axis representing trajectory (or perhaps the bore axis) and then using your coefficient multiplier example over the sight radius. What do you mean by sight radius? Is is the metric radius of the round portion of the front sight or the radius of the target in its actual linear units? Thanks again! | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Thanks Don!!!! I like simpler anyway than the path I was attempting to go down. Where did you and Denton pick up this knowledge? I would like to read this information to internalize it myself. Thanks in advance... | |||
|
<Don G> |
Alex, I think I learned about similar triangles and ratios when I was twelve years old. Since I'm an engineer, the concept and it's uses have been driven home countless times since. Don | ||
one of us |
Don, The answer to my question comes in the similar angles solutions that both you & Denton asserted. Because you have simply scaled back the starting metric to the firearm itself, the right angle begins at the bore axis (representing side b) and then is raised or lowered based upon the sight (representing side a) one can now determine the theta on the tan or cot relationship. (pound my forehead...). Thanks again. | |||
|
one of us |
Sight radius is just the distance from the rear sight to the front sight. The formula comes from solving the proportion X4/X3=X1/X2, where X3 is the distance to the target X4 is the amount POI is raised or lowered X1 is the amount the front sight is raised or lowered X2 is the distance from the front sight to the rear sight. Solving for X4 gives the equation I posted. Anyway, the long sight radius of the Swede gives a decent basis for comparison.... shorter sight radius will give more shift at target per change in sight height... so between 1/8" per thousandth for a really long barrel, and maybe 3/16" per thou for a short rifle is in the ballpark. Good luck! | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks for elaborating Denton! The information you two have provided, enabled me to precisely articulate to my customer the buying decision criterion. I finally asserted to him that it is based upon his personal technique and style in order to make the correct decision for him. Naturally, because he was an ole ground pounding jarhead, he knew which decision to make immediately. Thanks again! | |||
|
one of us |
Alex, Order a Brownells catalog and the complete mathamatical formula for iron sights with any lenth barrel is there for your information, its in the iron sight section. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Thanks Ray! Yep, its right here on page 265, never bothered to look... [ 07-18-2002, 22:08: Message edited by: Alex Szabo ] | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia