29 July 2004, 14:44
<JOHAN>O/U or SXS double??
Gentlemen
I often hear from fellow rifle loonies that O/U are soo much more stronger and easier to shoot etc, this topic often comes up when it's discussion about shotguns

Now, how come that almost no double rifles over 375 cal are made in this "superior" design?

Don't be shy

Cheers
/ JOHAN
Because if God intended you to shoot an over/under he would have placed your eyes that way.

29 July 2004, 18:50
vigillinusBravo jbmi, hadn't heard that one before.
29 July 2004, 18:59
CustomstoxJohan,
Still chuckling over the response from jbmi. I think it is more out of tradition, with most people thinking of a double rifle being a s/s. I do not feel that the O/U is any stronger although it may be the case, but in a shotgun is does eliminate the problem that is created in some people with two barrels in your view. The "single" sighting plane helps some eiminates that problem. The s/s double has a single sighting plane also but some people cross sight over the adjacent barrel.
29 July 2004, 19:08
vigillinusOn a double for dangerous game, sxs is preferable simply because you don't have to open it so far to reload.
29 July 2004, 19:20
Customstoxvigillinus, just like the duck blind argument for them.

Beretta makes both. Once, when the Beretta showroom was still in Alexandria, VA, I asked there why their SXS rifle was considerably more expensive than their O/U rifle in the same caliber(s). The answer I was given by the salesperson is that the SXS is more difficult and expensive to regulate. I don't know whether that answer is correct.
I like O/U shotguns, much more than SXS ones. But an O/U rifle seems "wrong" for some ineffable reason.