THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Recoil reducers
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have a Sako in 375 that weighs about 4#, or at least feels like it when you light it off. What recoil reducers do you like? I'm referring to the type installed in a hole drilled in the stock.
 
Posts: 2827 | Location: Seattle, in the other Washington | Registered: 26 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've installed mercury filled and the Kicking Mule dead-weight type reducers before. To save a little money and end up with the same result, use lead shot mixed with epoxy. I'm not convinced that weight sloshing back and forth is more effective than weight that stays put.

I'm also not a fan of putting the weight only in the buttstock as it can unbalance the rifle. A trough routed in the barrel channel just ahead of the recoil lug is a good spot. It puts the weight more "between the hands". While the rifle will be heavier, it doesn't feel unbalanced when shouldered. You may need some in the butt and the barrel channel to balance things up and get the weight you want.

Good luck.


Mark Pursell
 
Posts: 545 | Location: Liberty, MO | Registered: 21 January 2003Reply With Quote
One Of Us
Picture of new_guy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by M Pursell:
I'm also not a fan of putting the weight only in the buttstock as it can unbalance the rifle. A trough routed in the barrel channel just ahead of the recoil lug is a good spot. It puts the weight more "between the hands". While the rifle will be heavier, it doesn't feel unbalanced when shouldered. You may need some in the butt and the barrel channel to balance things up and get the weight you want.

Good luck.


Excellent advice! I can only add that under the grip cap is another ideal "between the hands" place to add some weight.

Keeping weight off of the two extreme ends of the gun is paramount for good handling.


www.heymusa.com


HSC Booth # 306
SCI Booth # 3947
 
Posts: 4026 | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the lead in the stock is a nice idea.I replaced weight in my gun after removing a big scope and replacing with a very much lighter scope on my 375. I poured about 6oz of lead in a channel I dremeled out directly in front of the reciol lug recess and capped with epoxy, and drilled a 5/8" dia hole in the butt and poured about 4oz. I then added an F990 pad to the stock. To be honest with you, the weight replaced was not necessarily more than what it was before I replaced the scope, so technically the rifle is not heavier per se. But, the F990 pad makes the rifle feel so much more like a push than a punch. I can shoot it now at the bench all day long, and only start to feel it after almost 30 rounds. If you decide to go with the lead, spend that money on the pad, you will not regret it.
 
Posts: 986 | Location: Columbia, SC | Registered: 22 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm convinced that recoil reducers only work by adding weight to the gun, at least that's what my shoulder tells me.

Funny how so many want lightweight big bores...until it's time to start shooting. Wink
----------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This Sako actually belongs to a friend. My own 375 is based on a M70 LH action and weighs 10#. It's quite pleasant to shoot offhand.

Thanks to all for the comments.
 
Posts: 2827 | Location: Seattle, in the other Washington | Registered: 26 April 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia