THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Weatherby question
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of cooperjd
posted
I have a question as i'm researching some info for a friend of mine.

here's the deal. he has an old wby vanguard in .300WM, early to mid 60s i think. he loves the rifle, and has killed most of his game with it.

here's the issue. normally, the barrel is free floated (dollar bill test) and the gun shoots great. but where he lives in colorado and the way he likes to hunt, he prefers to have his harris bipod attached to the stock. when he attaches the bipod, his point of impact shifts about 8" at 100 yards. this happens whether or not the bipod is actually used, so legs up or down, it seems to be just the weight of attaching it does this.

he did the dollar bill test with the bipod on, and its a no go, there is a pinch point.

now to me, this is simple. remove the barreled action, take away a small bit of the stock in the channel, and keep checking fit with bipod.. once its free floating again, seal the wood to keep out moisture, and he should be good to go. right?

he has been told by a local smith there near durango, co, to never touch a weatherby, the stock, nothing, he'll ruin the accuracy of the gun.

is this a theme with wbys? to me, if the barrel is free floated, it shouldnt matter to the barrel if it has .001" clearance or .1" clearance (ignoring thermal expansion), since it doesn't touch the stock.
am i missing something there?

thank you, and please excuse the question if its too rookie, i'm learning Smiler
 
Posts: 786 | Location: Mt Pleasant, SC | Registered: 19 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
I don't have a definitive answer, but I'll give you some opinions.

First, I don't think that being able to slide a dollar bill between the barrel and the stock means one has a free-floated barrel. I suspect a lot of barrels vibrate (whip) more than that when fired.

Second, with my match rifles, I commonly floated them by at least 3/8 " clearance all the way around. That is true with both my "across the course" hi-power bolt rifles, and my benchrest bolt rifles. Seemed to work fine on either, and I certainly didn't worry much about warpage between one match and the next.

Some rifles shoot well with free-floated barrels, some rifles shoot great with "pressure point" bedded barrels. And years ago I had rifles which shot superbly with full length glass bedded barrels.

I think the important thing is that once a person has a rifle shooting well, he should do everything he can to make sure the bedding doesn't change.

I also believe that "make" hasn't got a damned thing to do with the application of physical science to the problem. Physical science does not change, no matter who is sticking the machine together. If the physical things are done correctly for that barreled action, the sucker will shoot, even if my mother-in-law did the work. Wink
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mike_Dettorre
posted Hide Post
He needs to find a new gunsmith. A dollar bill is .004-.005 in thickness. Barrel whip is often much more than that. .030 is about right for free floating...meaning 6-7 dollar bills worth


Mike

Legistine actu quod scripsi?

Never under estimate the internet community's ability to reply to your post with their personal rant about their tangentially related, single occurrence issue.




What I have learned on AR, since 2001:
1. The proper answer to: Where is the best place in town to get a steak dinner? is…You should go to Mel's Diner and get the fried chicken.
2. Big game animals can tell the difference between .015 of an inch in diameter, 15 grains of bullet weight, and 150 fps.
3. There is a difference in the performance of two identical projectiles launched at the same velocity if they came from different cartridges.
4. While a double rifle is the perfect DGR, every 375HH bolt gun needs to be modified to carry at least 5 down.
5. While a floor plate and detachable box magazine both use a mechanical latch, only the floor plate latch is reliable. Disregard the fact that every modern military rifle uses a detachable box magazine.
6. The Remington 700 is unreliable regardless of the fact it is the basis of the USMC M40 sniper rifle for 40+ years with no changes to the receiver or extractor and is the choice of more military and law enforcement sniper units than any other rifle.
7. PF actions are not suitable for a DGR and it is irrelevant that the M1, M14, M16, & AK47 which were designed for hunting men that can shoot back are all PF actions.
8. 95 deg F in Africa is different than 95 deg F in TX or CA and that is why you must worry about ammunition temperature in Africa (even though most safaris take place in winter) but not in TX or in CA.
9. The size of a ding in a gun's finish doesn't matter, what matters is whether it’s a safe ding or not.
10. 1 in a row is a trend, 2 in a row is statistically significant, and 3 in a row is an irrefutable fact.
11. Never buy a WSM or RCM cartridge for a safari rifle or your go to rifle in the USA because if they lose your ammo you can't find replacement ammo but don't worry 280 Rem, 338-06, 35 Whelen, and all Weatherby cartridges abound in Africa and back country stores.
12. A well hit animal can run 75 yds. in the open and suddenly drop with no initial blood trail, but the one I shot from 200 yds. away that ran 10 yds. and disappeared into a thicket and was not found was lost because the bullet penciled thru. I am 100% certain of this even though I have no physical evidence.
13. A 300 Win Mag is a 500 yard elk cartridge but a 308 Win is not a 300 yard elk cartridge even though the same bullet is travelling at the same velocity at those respective distances.
 
Posts: 10169 | Location: Loving retirement in Boise, ID | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike_Dettorre:
He needs to find a new gunsmith. A dollar bill is .004-.005 in thickness. Barrel whip is often much more than that. .030 is about right for free floating...meaning 6-7 dollar bills worth


Is that adjusted for inflation?




Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4867 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cooperjd:
he has been told by a local smith there near durango, co, to never touch a weatherby, the stock, nothing, he'll ruin the accuracy of the gun.



I'm thinking this gunsmith, the one near Durango Co, doesn't know much about rifles. Weatherby's in particular.


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kcstott
posted Hide Post
Your barrel is not free floated. Like others have stated the thickness of a dollar bill is hardly enough to be considered free floated.

The barrel channel needs to be scraped out for more clearance .030" is a good place to start


www.KLStottlemyer.com

Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK
 
Posts: 2534 | Location: National City CA | Registered: 15 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by z1r:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike_Dettorre:
He needs to find a new gunsmith. A dollar bill is .004-.005 in thickness. Barrel whip is often much more than that. .030 is about right for free floating...meaning 6-7 dollar bills worth


Is that adjusted for inflation?


Thats funny Mike! tu2



Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station

Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
 
Posts: 8351 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had this happen on a client's gun. When he attached the bi-pod, it was screwed down too tight and caused the wood to "bend" and touch the barrel.


Jim Kobe
10841 Oxborough Ave So
Bloomington MN 55437
952.884.6031
Professional member American Custom Gunmakers Guild

 
Posts: 5534 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 10 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It's a far out possibility, but it could be that an "almost" floated barrel which passes the dollar bill test is actually acting as a barrel vibration damper, and the change is due to the weight of the bipod increasing the float.

I am, in general, a fan of floated barrels, but when I am tuning a rifle, I generally follow the old Jack O'Conner method he espoused when I was a kid. Try some pressure first. Insert a cardboard shim at the tip. If that doesn'e work, try two thicknesses. Use something like thick target paper. If the pressure doesn't work, then try wood removal. It's hard to put it back, so be sure before you remove it.
 
Posts: 1238 | Location: Lexington, Kentucky, USA | Registered: 04 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
It's hard to put it back, so be sure before you remove it.

Reminds me of the old carpenter joke..."I've cut that board 3 times now, and it's STILL too short"! :-)
 
Posts: 20175 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Art S.:
It's a far out possibility, but it could be that an "almost" floated barrel which passes the dollar bill test is actually acting as a barrel vibration damper, and the change is due to the weight of the bipod increasing the float.

I am, in general, a fan of floated barrels, but when I am tuning a rifle, I generally follow the old Jack O'Conner method he espoused when I was a kid. Try some pressure first. Insert a cardboard shim at the tip. If that doesn'e work, try two thicknesses. Use something like thick target paper. If the pressure doesn't work, then try wood removal. It's hard to put it back, so be sure before you remove it.



Art, you're cheating! You are thinking the possibilities through. I don't think that is far-fetched at all. You could well be right.


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cooperjd
posted Hide Post
Art,
thats a good thought, but once the bipod is in place, my friend tells me that the dollar bill test fails, so it is adding a pressure point.

so for my own education, a free floated barrel starts at .030".

if it is less than that, say, just a dollar bill test, the the barrel is likely making contact on the shot due to oscillations in the barrel. now, as long as this contact is the same every time, it should shoot consistently, yes?

but if it will only pass the dollar bill test, not truly free floated, and wood is removed under a part of the barrel, enough so that the bipod will pass the dollar bill test, will this change the way the barrel acts at the shot when the bipod is removed?

i know its a lot of questions, but i'm trying to learn a few things.
thanks for your help
 
Posts: 786 | Location: Mt Pleasant, SC | Registered: 19 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kcstott
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cooperjd:
Art,
thats a good thought, but once the bipod is in place, my friend tells me that the dollar bill test fails, so it is adding a pressure point.

so for my own education, a free floated barrel starts at .030".


Yep and that's all the way around, 180 degrees.

quote:

if it is less than that, say, just a dollar bill test, the the barrel is likely making contact on the shot due to oscillations in the barrel. now, as long as this contact is the same every time, it should shoot consistently, yes?


Possibly but not likely. Shot to shot consistency is probably not that good.

quote:


but if it will only pass the dollar bill test, not truly free floated, and wood is removed under a part of the barrel, enough so that the bipod will pass the dollar bill test, will this change the way the barrel acts at the shot when the bipod is removed?
Most likely it will. Typically you plan on any change you make to create another problem until proven otherwise. Just try using QR mounts on a precision rifle. they do not go back in the same location. There is a tolerance to everything and it's controlling what you can that makes a rifle accurate

quote:

i know its a lot of questions, but i'm trying to learn a few things.
thanks for your help


That's how we learn... Me included


www.KLStottlemyer.com

Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK
 
Posts: 2534 | Location: National City CA | Registered: 15 December 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia