Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One Of Us |
Looking for best-quality, 100% reliable options. Aside from true custom mounts ($800+), anyone with an opinion on Conetrol (about $240/set)? Here is a partial quote:
Picture the below in a stainless steel finish on a stainless steel rifle: | ||
|
one of us |
I have a stainless steel left handed model 70 with stainless david gentry featherweigh mounts. to my eye they look real good and clean. pm me with your email address and I will send you photos. Jeff | |||
|
One Of Us |
P.M. will be sent. | |||
|
One of Us |
While I like my Conetrol mounts, I like my S&K mounts even better. Check them out. | |||
|
one of us |
I love the sculpted mounts. I use them on all my better rifles. Larry "Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson | |||
|
One of Us |
CanadianLefty I have used Conetrols on a 30-06 and a 338 WM. They look good, hold tight, and are a PITA to install. Like DougH9, I have also used S&K bases and rings. I think the aesthetics are a little better than Conetrol, but that is always a very subjective call. They are both excellent quality mounts in every way. Regards, Waynee E. | |||
|
One of Us |
I am looking at getting some Conetrols aswell,for M70 Stainless action.I like stainless rifles but not silver scopes. My bases will be custumSS, but the rings will be MatteBlue to match the matteblack scope. I have a SaM70, so I will reverse the rear base that we see in CandianLefty's picture, to increase distance between rings, will make it about 130mm, same as a Leupold 2.5-8x tube length. So far,(last 30yrs)I have not heard of them failing. They are near he lowest you will get, 1.58mm between tube and base,about the only thing lower is Leupold Superlows about 1.27mm between tube and base,which I have at the moment. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia