The Accurate Reloading Forums
Identify a rifle please.
28 December 2006, 07:15
FjoldIdentify a rifle please.
Can anyone tell me who made this?
SEARS Mod 53. Sears Roebuck & co.
Mod no. 273.32070"
the action has
"U134XXX" printed on the side, not sure if you guys need the three numbers at the end.
Thanks for any info.
Frank
"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953
NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite
28 December 2006, 07:37
oupaWinchester Mod. 70.
An old man sleeps with his conscience, a young man sleeps with his dreams.
28 December 2006, 07:42
GSP7I think thats the sears winchester m70. sears Model 53
28 December 2006, 07:44
FjoldThanks, it's not mine and it didn't look anything like my Win 70 classic.
This rifle is unfired in the box and chambered in 243 Win. Since Winchester didn't chamber the 243 until 1955 can you tell approximately what vintage it is?
Is it worth anything exceptional?
Frank
"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953
NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite
28 December 2006, 07:50
craigsterEconomy version of 1972 type Model 70, without hinged floorplate or forend tip. MFG 1972-78.
28 December 2006, 07:51
FjoldThanks again.
Frank
"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953
NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite
28 December 2006, 07:54
craigsterquote:
Originally posted by Fjold:
Thanks, it's not mine and it didn't look anything like my Win 70 classic.
This rifle is unfired in the box and chambered in 243 Win. Since Winchester didn't chamber the 243 until 1955 can you tell approximately what vintage it is?
Is it worth anything exceptional?
Blue Book (22nd) shows $325 for a 100% gun.
28 December 2006, 09:27
HarrisAm I going blind or is the extractor missing from this rifle?
The price of knowledge is great but the price of ignorance is even greater.
28 December 2006, 12:06
James C Scott
Harris, I think it"s probably blued.
28 December 2006, 12:42
vapodogActually, that's a Winchester M-670 and they were pretty rough
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
28 December 2006, 17:30
jeffeosso$200 bucks, on gunbroker, for a fired one
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=6314710328 December 2006, 20:02
vanIt should say on the barrel,I think Ted williams model sold by sears and roebuck. Its modeled off the win model 70,and was a contract rifle at that time. van
28 December 2006, 20:11
StonecreekThe rifle is a Winchester Model 70 action (post 64), and may have been sold by either Winchester or Sears, depending on the markings. It appears in the second picture that there may be a magazine floorplate. If so, and if the stock is hardwood (as it appears) rather than walnut, then this is an odd duck as most of the "economy" hardwood-stocked models used a blind magazine.
As to vintage, it would likely have been made in the very late 60's or the 70's.
28 December 2006, 21:46
reelmanI have one of these very rifles as a beater and borrower rifle. It is made by Winchester and is basically just a cheaper M70. Mine has a hinged floor plate that looks like it is made out of some cheap-ass white metal that is then painted black.
There is no mauser style extractor because it is a post-64 M70.
Overall it's not a bad rifle and if it can be oicked up for $200 it is a heck of a bargain!