Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Is the "lip" (?) that is on the military b/m at the back of the magazine, that fits up into the action, also present on custom b/m? ...or is the top of the mag box flat, with no protrusion? Thanks, Bob | ||
|
<JBelk> |
B Stephenson-- That's a secondary recoil shoulder and is called the magazine "tang". It is present on most custom bottom metal but I've seen some without it. | ||
one of us |
Thanks Jack Bob | |||
|
one of us |
D'Arcy- So, in your valued opinion, is the tang needed? Do you incorporate them on a Mauser box? Thanks, Bob | |||
|
one of us |
IMO that tang is more for alignment than anything else. | |||
|
<JBelk> |
No doubt it's for alignment, primarily...... I was reffering to what you see on the (especially large caliber) commercial M-98s...... They bed the back flat of the mag box tight to the stock. The boss that encircles the recoil lug extension engages with the action to transfer a portion of the recoil of the action to the mag box and thence to the stock just ahead of the second cross bolt, if one is there. When looking at the Model A and B sporters it seems they were bedded as a unit, top and bottom, for recoil absorption instead of just the receiver. Of course modern triggers dictate we cut away a lot of wood in the trigger mortice that would normally remain in the original sporters. It's probably a moot point. I agree, the mag tang should not touch the receiver...in that direction lies flyers and ugly groups. | ||
<D`Arcy Echols> |
B, Before you get out the hacksaw I would assemble the action one more time and load the magazine from the top side. If you remove that "tang" what else, if anything, will be effected in how you charge the magazine box with that "tang" gone???? | ||
one of us |
Thanks all. Bob | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia