I have a chance to get a Browning 1885 single shot low wall in .357 Mag. I have no use for this rifle in 357 but if it could be rechambered to 35 Remington or 356/358 Winchester or ?????? I may concider it. Any opinions? Thanks in advance for your input. This forum ALWAYS gets answers!!!
Posts: 258 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 10 March 2003
The 1885 also comes chambered for the 45/65 and the 45/70. I don't see why it would'nt handle the 35 Remington or the 358 Win. The action should be more than adequate.
Posts: 730 | Location: Prescott, AZ | Registered: 07 February 2001
Actually, i think you could get away with the 35 remington, but I wouldn't push it any higher then that. Weren't these (low walls) available in 38-55 at one time? - Dan
Posts: 5285 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 05 October 2001
Tim, the new Lo-walls will handle the high pressure rounds ok but the rate of twist in the barrel for the 357 will probably not work with the faster rounds. I am not sure what twist rate it has but would assume that it would be way too slow to work. The Browning Lo-walls were chambered in 243 Winchester andare a strong action, not like the original Winchester Lo-wall. Tom
Posts: 12 | Location: Santa Maria, Ca | Registered: 27 December 2002
quote:I don't think the low wall is enough action to handle the 35 Remington or the 358 Winchester and I wouldn't recommend it.
Since these Browning low-walls have been factory-made in .243 Winchester and .260 Remington, there's NO REASON WHY they couldn't be chambered for the .358 Win., not to mention the .35 Rem., which operates at a lot lower pressures than either the .243 or .260!!
I personally don't understand why Browning never made these guns in .308 Win., one of the world's most popular calibers (like the .243 is!!)
Have never had a Browning but own and have owned many an original 1885 Winchester. The lowall whether Winchester or Browning does not support the top of the breechblock and I suspect you are going to get case stretching in the .243 Browning. I would not go to a .358 or even a .35 Remington, and respectfully disagree with Eldeguello.
quote:Originally posted by vigillinus: Have never had a Browning but own and have owned many an original 1885 Winchester. The lowall whether Winchester or Browning does not support the top of the breechblock and I suspect you are going to get case stretching in the .243 Browning. I would not go to a .358 or even a .35 Remington, and respectfully disagree with Eldeguello.
I bought 6 of these about 3 years ago. All in 260 Remington. Five very satisfied customers and mine puts 3 shoots into less than 3/4" with 120 grain barnes X bullets and 44 gr VV550.
Certainly safe enough for any .308 class case. Sure wish Browning/Winchester would reintroduce this rife as it is a beauty.
Posts: 472 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 08 March 2002
357 max little more and very easy to do. Given the action, I would say it's safer than a revolver, and as tough as any contender, go 357 max and pump it up to rifle pressures.
Posts: 56 | Location: Howard City, Michigan | Registered: 04 November 2003
As stated, the low wall Miroku is not in any way a low wall Winchester. Now, if you have never disassembled one, be prepared for a treat; they have two coil mainsprings that are impossible to get back in. I hate the internal design.
Posts: 17386 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009
Originally posted by dpcd: As stated, the low wall Miroku is not in any way a low wall Winchester. Now, if you have never disassembled one, be prepared for a treat; they have two coil mainsprings that are impossible to get back in. I hate the internal design.
They definitely are different inside. WILL cause gray hairs and cuss words. Maybe Pederson's ghost designed it.