THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Browning 1885 Rechamber Question??
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I have a chance to get a Browning 1885 single shot low wall in .357 Mag. I have no use for this rifle in 357 but if it could be rechambered to 35 Remington or 356/358 Winchester or ?????? I may concider it. Any opinions? Thanks in advance for your input. This forum ALWAYS gets answers!!!
 
Posts: 258 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 10 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Scrollcutter
posted Hide Post
I don't think the low wall is enough action to handle the 35 Remington or the 358 Winchester and I wouldn't recommend it.
 
Posts: 1634 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 29 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jim White
posted Hide Post
The 1885 also comes chambered for the 45/65 and the 45/70. I don't see why it would'nt handle the 35 Remington or the 358 Win. The action should be more than adequate.
 
Posts: 730 | Location: Prescott, AZ | Registered: 07 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Scrollcutter
posted Hide Post
Jim:

The 45-70 is chambered in 1885 "Hiwall" not the lowall.

Big difference.
 
Posts: 1634 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 29 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Actually, i think you could get away with the 35 remington, but I wouldn't push it any higher then that. Weren't these (low walls) available in 38-55 at one time? - Dan
 
Posts: 5285 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 05 October 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Tim, the new Lo-walls will handle the high pressure rounds ok but the rate of twist in the barrel for the 357 will probably not work with the faster rounds. I am not sure what twist rate it has but would assume that it would be way too slow to work. The Browning Lo-walls were chambered in 243 Winchester andare a strong action, not like the original Winchester Lo-wall. Tom
 
Posts: 12 | Location: Santa Maria, Ca | Registered: 27 December 2002Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
quote:
I don't think the low wall is enough action to handle the 35 Remington or the 358 Winchester and I wouldn't recommend it.

Since these Browning low-walls have been factory-made in .243 Winchester and .260 Remington, there's NO REASON WHY they couldn't be chambered for the .358 Win., not to mention the .35 Rem., which operates at a lot lower pressures than either the .243 or .260!!

I personally don't understand why Browning never made these guns in .308 Win., one of the world's most popular calibers (like the .243 is!!)
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Have never had a Browning but own and have owned many an original 1885 Winchester. The lowall whether Winchester or Browning does not support the top of the breechblock and I suspect you are going to get case stretching in the .243 Browning. I would not go to a .358 or even a .35 Remington, and respectfully disagree with Eldeguello.
 
Posts: 1233 | Registered: 25 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vigillinus:
Have never had a Browning but own and have owned many an original 1885 Winchester. The lowall whether Winchester or Browning does not support the top of the breechblock and I suspect you are going to get case stretching in the .243 Browning. I would not go to a .358 or even a .35 Remington, and respectfully disagree with Eldeguello.

I bought 6 of these about 3 years ago. All in 260 Remington. Five very satisfied customers and mine puts 3 shoots into less than 3/4" with 120 grain barnes X bullets and 44 gr VV550.

Certainly safe enough for any .308 class case. Sure wish Browning/Winchester would reintroduce this rife as it is a beauty.
 
Posts: 472 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 08 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
How about 35-40 Maynard?
[Smile]
Brent
 
Posts: 2257 | Location: Where I've bought resident tags:MN, WI, IL, MI, KS, GA, AZ, IA | Registered: 30 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
357 max little more and very easy to do. Given the action, I would say it's safer than a revolver, and as tough as any contender, go 357 max and pump it up to rifle pressures.
 
Posts: 56 | Location: Howard City, Michigan | Registered: 04 November 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My 35-40 is chambered in a Stevens 44 1/2


quote:
Originally posted by Brent:
How about 35-40 Maynard?<br /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/smile.gif" /> <br />Brent
 
Posts: 62 | Registered: 07 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
As stated, the low wall Miroku is not in any way a low wall Winchester.
Now, if you have never disassembled one, be prepared for a treat; they have two coil mainsprings that are impossible to get back in. I hate the internal design.
 
Posts: 17291 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
As stated, the low wall Miroku is not in any way a low wall Winchester.
Now, if you have never disassembled one, be prepared for a treat; they have two coil mainsprings that are impossible to get back in. I hate the internal design.


They definitely are different inside. WILL cause gray hairs and cuss words. Maybe Pederson's ghost designed it.
 
Posts: 243 | Registered: 24 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
357 Max is the easy way to juice this up some. How about a 35 Rem Rimmed. The brass is made from 303 British. I just prefer a rim in a single shot.

Can use factory 35 Rem with an appropriate extractor.
 
Posts: 53 | Location: Central Pennsylvania | Registered: 01 December 2017Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Wow, 17 years and 3 days...
 
Posts: 1692 | Location: East Coast | Registered: 06 January 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia