THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Talley mounts - torque or tight?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Ropes
posted
Is there an actual torgue value for the bolts on the talley mounts or do you just screw em down until the scope doesnt move?

Thanks, John
 
Posts: 549 | Location: Denial | Registered: 27 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ropes:
Is there an actual torgue value for the bolts on the talley mounts or do you just screw em down until the scope doesnt move?

Thanks, John


Since all manufacturers recommend different specs for tightening (and change them frequently) I would suggest you contact Talley and ask for their recommended specs for the particular mounts you have. There is a great article on Brownells website (webkinks) this month about torquing bolts and screws on weapons...very informative.
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Watch that you don't overtighten. I tightened my talleys with a T-shaped driver and overtightened to the point that I bound up the variable ring. The Leupold customer service folks told me that they'd had lots of problems with people overtightening the torx screws on rings and messing up scopes. Bob
 
Posts: 1287 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: 20 October 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ropes
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the answers I will write/call talley for the information..

John
 
Posts: 549 | Location: Denial | Registered: 27 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Talley told me 35 inch pounds on the bases and 25 inch pounds on the rings.
 
Posts: 1093 | Location: Florida | Registered: 14 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Does it depend at all on the recoil of the rifle, ie .458 lott etc. should be tighter than a .222 rem ??
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PC:
Does it depend at all on the recoil of the rifle, ie .458 lott etc. should be tighter than a .222 rem ??


PC,

Not really, in practical situations. I guess if a rifle was clamped down where the weapon could not move with the recoil the heavier calibers might need larger fasteners torqued to a higher degree that smaller calibers would.

Torquing a fastener is a process done to place a pre-load on the fastener that results in enough friction (tension) to overcome whatever force is going to be trying to separate whatever joint is being held together by the fastener.

Recoil does not try to “pull†screws out...it tries to “shear†them off.

The common sizes of base and ring screws are plenty strong enough to withstand the recoil (shearing) forces generated by just about any shoulder fired weapon...even with really large and heavy scopes attached. Assuming that some amount of pre-load is present after tightening them down.

Ask just about any manufacturer of scopes/bases/rings and they will tell you that the “amount†of torque is far less important than the consistency of the torque among the screws. The idea is to get all the screws that are acting in conjunction with each other to equal amounts of torque.

The other thing that allot of guys forget about is the stress applied to a torqued fastener. Screws and bolts actually stretch when torqued and over a period of time, depending on the number of times they have been taken out and then re-torqued, the material can fatigue to the point that it will fail.

When you hear someone talking about “shearing off†a base screw you will normally find that it was an old screw that had been removed and re-installed many times and that fastener had just reached its fatigue limit.
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Rick,

thanks for that..................I am an over tightner from hell !!
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PC:
Rick,

thanks for that..................I am an over tightner from hell !!


PC,

I used to be the same! Eeker It took me snapping off two or three head bolts on my first car to get the idea that tighter ain’t always better...at least with fasteners! Razzer
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia