Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I belive that the 17s were made from very good steel and Think the the reciver ring is bigger in dia. them most giving you round for the bigger rds. | |||
|
<ezell> |
It's all in the design plus nickle steel. | ||
one of us |
Don't confuse the ability of an action to hold a large cartridge such as a 505 Gibbs with it's being Strong( or able to handle very high pressures). Action Strength is a result of design, proper metalurgy and proper heat treating and tempering. A square used the 1917 Enfield actions for their Big Bores up to the 577 T-Rex because they were cheap, available and at least in the Winchester varient reasonably sturdy. There is alot of controversy about the strength of Nickle Steel and many stories circulated about some of these actions suddenly failing. Personally, I like the 1917 Enfield, and have never had a problem with one ( or seen a problem one either) but it's a real bear to work on. Gunsmithing costs for conversions are pretty high.-Rob [ 07-26-2002, 04:53: Message edited by: Robgunbuilder ] | |||
|
one of us |
Monyhunter, I had posted a related post on this forum some time ago and J Belk sent me some brilliant files by e-mail on precisely your type of question. If he hasn't sent them to you already, I could send them to you if you want them. Do let me know. Good shooting. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia