Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
On my M 51, the hole spacing is the same on the front and rear of the action. A one piece base does not fit, as the rear hole is between the two rear holes. If I use a two piece base, I can't find one with wide enough holes. Any ideas or am I forced to drill a new hole in the rear? Remember, forgivness is easier to get than permission. | ||
|
one of us |
Did you try Model 70 bases? I think this is correct. I will go look at mine later today and post what it uses! Don't limit your challenges . . . Challenge your limits | |||
|
one of us |
I have luepold 2 piece reverse front, bases for FN/ jc higgins mauser on mine. | |||
|
one of us |
The post-1955 actions have the same spacing front and rear, and the regular FN bases don't fit them. Did you try the Leupold #49989 one-piece base? "There are only three kinds of people; those who can count, and those who can't." | |||
|
one of us |
Terry, If you have the action with the hole spacing at .875 both front and rear, no bases are currently available... You have to go fish in parts boxes for an old set of early Leupolds? with an arrow marking the direction of the mount (the only marking on the bases). I came up with a set- Talley rings fit these bases well and as an added bonus mount the scope considerably lower than Talley bases... Or, have a custom set whipped up by one of the machining wizards on this site... | |||
|
one of us |
Conetrol might have bases, but their mounts are expensive as all get out. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia